Moin, even though I missed the heat of this thread, there are some
technical aspects I must address for the future, especially to those
against Derek's view, but Derek, too.
This has gone very off-limits for different reasons.
I understand on the receiving end now that I did bad in the past
myself
Hello Brian,
On Friday, May 18, 2007 at 9:40:28 +1000, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I fear I have been wasting your time. This mail was in a list digest
No problem, I understand now. Yes, digests tend to be broken in such
and other ways (see sig ;). Note there is a third possibility besides
n
Here is my folder-hooks file,
:-)
Thanx
Danny
> > > > The `mutt -D` output is more useful, though, since that shows the
> > > > result of *all* the config files (and we don't have to worry about
> > > > whether we missed something).
> >
> > mutt -D does nothing. My version of mutt is 1.5.9i. I