* John P Verel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-06 19:31]:
> This worked just as promised! Cleaning out the Message-IDs was no big
> deal. Thanks a million Darren! Forgive my delay in responding, but I
> just found time to do this today.
Nice. I banged it out pretty quickly.
> I piped the output
Hi,
* Michael Elkins [02-10-05 23:15:05 +0200] wrote:
> Rocco Rutte wrote:
[...]
> > score '~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]?' ...
> If you specify all lowercase letters, Mutt will
> automatically use a case-insensitive search. If you use
> at least one uppercase letter, Mutt assumes case-sensitive
I have the following macro defined to report spam to Razor:
macro index S"| ~/spamassassin/usr/bin/spamassassin -rd"
This works great on a message-by-message basis. However, given the amount
of spam that I receive, it would be nice to be able to mass-report several
emails at once.
>From my
Hi,
Using $sort, $sort_aux, $sort_browsing (that's what Ive tried) I would
like to sort my mails by threads so that when a new mail which belongs
to a previous thread, arrives, mutt moves the freshly updated thread
at the top of the index.
Currently, the mail is just put in a thread, and I have t
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Fred told:
> Hi,
>
> Using $sort, $sort_aux, $sort_browsing (that's what Ive tried) I
> would like to sort my mails by threads so that when a new mail
> which belongs to a previous thread, arrives, mutt moves the
> freshly updated thread at the top of
On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:50:32AM +0200, Fred wrote:
> Using $sort, $sort_aux, $sort_browsing (that's what Ive tried) I would
> like to sort my mails by threads so that when a new mail which belongs
> to a previous thread, arrives, mutt moves the freshly updated thread
> at the top of the index.
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Kurt Lieber told:
> I have the following macro defined to report spam to Razor:
>
> macro index S"| ~/spamassassin/usr/bin/spamassassin -rd"
>
> This works great on a message-by-message basis. However, given the amount
> of spam that I receive,
* Rocco Rutte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-07 13:14]:
>score '(~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
> ...which works as intended while:
>
>score '(~s \[?mutt\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
>
> ...is applied to all messages and doesn't work.
"~w"? using some patches, i presume? nntp
Rocco Rutte wrote:
> Hmm, I thought so, too, and tried it before I asked the list
> for help because I doesn't work. I use:
>
>score '(~s \[?[Mm][Uu][Tt][Tt]\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
>
> ...which works as intended while:
>
>score '(~s \[?mutt\]? ) ~w $newsgroup' +100
>
> ...is applied
Hello.
I have noticed that the pre-packaged mutt in RHL 8.0
(and also in prior versions) is compiled with the
options --disable-flock and --enable-fcntl and that
building the package does not produce any external
dotlock program (mutt_dotlock). When I customize the
package to add support for comp
On 10/07/02 08:40 -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> Change the last line (the "print" line) to read:
>
> print map "alias $_\n", sort keys %addrs;
>
> Which will give you a list like:
>
> alias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> alias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Many thanks!
John
11 matches
Mail list logo
