Re: List problems?

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:23:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote: > > > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And there is an error message at > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages tha

Re: List problems?

> > > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And there is an error message at > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says: > > > Warning! Your group has exceeded its message storage limits of 64 MB > > > by 0.0 MB. If

Re: List problems?

* D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30-09-2002 10:08]: > > > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday... > > > Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it > > on the list.. > > I also sent a reply to Sven's mail of last night about these problems. > H

Re: List problems?

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Ren?? Clerc wrote: > > > > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday... > > > Yes i sent a message to mutt.org last Friday and i never seen it > > > on the list.. > > I also sent a reply to Sven's mail of last night about these > > problems. He sent it t

Re: List problems?

Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org server? Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space, or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything? Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] since thats the only thing that works? [JPK] -- []+ Wisdom is vindicated by

Mutt-User List Servers

I'm wondering how the servers that manage the list are set up. Is there 1 server that receives all messages and many that send the messages to the subscribers? -- []+ Wisdom is vindicated by all her children. +[] []

Re: List problems?

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 07:26:40AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote: > Who is the kind person responsible for the mutt.org > server? > Is it possible they lost a disk, or ran out of space, > or their firewall went kabluey now blocking everything? > Is is it now ok to post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > since th

Two minor configuration questions

Two minor configuration questions that I haven't found answers for in the manual, list archives or google: 1. By default, when you delete a message in a mailbox index, mutt moves one message *down* by default. Can I change this to move one message *up*? 2. Once a message is deleted, but not a

Re: Two minor configuration questions

* Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 09:22]: > 1. By default, when you delete a message in a mailbox index, mutt > moves one message *down* by default. Can I change this to move one > message *up*? You can setup a macro: macro pager d "" Basically, delete - up - up. > 2. Once a m

Re: Tagging mail by date

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]: [...] > Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the > 'source' for archiving mail? I've been looking at archmbox but it > doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to > actually extract the messag

Colour problem on Solaris

As Sven just pointed out I have been using rather old versions of mutt I have upgraded all my mutts (four of them) to version 1.4i. All of the Linux ones were no problem, just ./configure with the required options, make and install and it worked like clockwork. However the Solaris 2.6 one is pro

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

* D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-29 23:24]: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote: > > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And there is an error message at > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mutt-users/messages that says: >

.procmailrc

A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users email. I'm currently using: :0 : * ^To:.*(mutt-.*) mutt-users :0 : * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*) mutt-users :0 : * ^From:.*(mutt-.*) mutt-users An better recipe out

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:42:54AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * D. J. Bolderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-29 23:24]: > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002, John Iverson wrote: > > > I am recently only seeing list messages that are (mis)addressed to > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. And there is an error message

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 the mental interface of savanna told: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my .muttrc ;-) ). >

reply-to alternatives

Hello, are there alternative headers to Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs? -Hanspeter

signatures - name+address is *minimum* (was: fast conversion of html mail to text)

* Laurabelle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 18:03]: > Just my 2p - I use procmail recipes (and a couple of scripts) to strip > HTML formatting from all legitimate email. The same scripts add a note > to the effect that HTML has been removed; if I want to exchange email > with that person again,

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt

* Robert Lillack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:11 +0200]: > since I have a lot of mailboxes i wanted to see only those > containing new mail while in the browser view. Because I use > MH folders all needed is just a really simple shell script: > > for i in `flist -all -recurse -noshowz

From: header wrong w/ multiple IMAP accounts

I'm setting up mutt for the first time and have been able to answer most of my questions through the docs and list archives. However, I've hit a wall on one issue. I have two accounts on the same IMAP server. I can successfully navigate between accounts using account-hooks. However, in both ac

Re: Tagging mail by date

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]: [...] > Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the > 'source' for archiving mail? I've been looking at archmbox but it > doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to > actually extract the messag

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-27 03:15 +1000]: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my .muttrc ;-) ). > >

Re: my_hdr not working with multiple IMAP accounts

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 01:46:28PM -0400, Kurt Lieber wrote: >I'm setting up mutt for the first time. I have two separate accounts, >both on the same IMAP server -- I want to set default From: addresses for >each of those accounts. My first question is; do I use account-hook or >folder-hook? I

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:42:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote: > You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the > folder-hook works. Now, is there any way to work around this problem ? I > tried removing the send-hook . lines, but to no avail. I would really > like to have this

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

[My first reply apparently didn't reach the list, so I'm going to try again. My apologies if this reaches the list twice.] On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:42:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote: > You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the > folder-hook works. Now, is there any way

Re: .procmailrc

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 15:51]: > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail > filtering, just wondering what people are using to catch all of the > mutt-users email. I'm currently using: [-- snip --] > An better recipe out there? I've been using: # Mutt

Re: .procmailrc

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +1000, savanna wrote: > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users > email. I'm currently using: > > :0 : > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users > > :0 : > * ^Cc:.*(mu

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

* On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-] > > so - 69 messages since 26th September... I only see about 9 messages *after* Sep 26 and they're all addressed to gbnet. Do the online archives look okay to you? I got the mes

Re: List problems? - gbnet.net problem?

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > > yeah i not getting any messages from the list since saterday... > Mutt 1.4i: =IN/MUTT (threads) [69/47071] [NEW=40058] [~d 26/9/2002-] > so - 69 messages since 26th September... > perhaps the problem is only with addresses > who subscribed to the

Re: .procmailrc

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002 the mental interface of savanna told: > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users > email. I'm currently using: > > :0 : > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users > > :0 : > * ^Cc:.*

Re: .procmailrc

* at 30. Sep. 2002 wrote savanna: > An better recipe out there? (procmail recipes aren't my strength). Yes, i use :0 H * Sender:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED] | rcvstore +Foren/Mutt-Users Bye Michael -- Bash ist zwar nur trocken Brot und Wasser, aber Tcl ist Nutella mit Maggi ;) -- Christian Perle in

Re: Colour problem on Solaris

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:55AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > As Sven just pointed out I have been using rather old versions of mutt > I have upgraded all my mutts (four of them) to version 1.4i. All of > the Linux ones were no problem, just ./configure with the required > options, make and inst

Re: Tagging mail by date

* Chris Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 08:38]: [...] > Or even better does anyone have any sample scripts using mutt as the > 'source' for archiving mail? I've been looking at archmbox but it > doesn't quite fit my requirements and I suspect that using mutt to > actually extract the messag

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 19:08]: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/mutt/pgpewrap.c?cvsroot=Mutt "Include C version of pgpewrap, by Wessel Dankers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>." maybe that's a hint? http://fruit.eu.org/.?word=wessel interesting

Re: The browser

* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 16:44]: > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox > when you're in the browsers mailbox view and place > the indicator on some mailbox and press enter? no. tell us about it! fat finger syndrome, maybe? ;-) Sven ["re-pro-du-ci-ble ex-

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt -> unmailboxes does not exist

* Robert Lillack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 15:46]: > since I have a lot of mailboxes i wanted to see only > those containing new mail while in the browser view. > Because I use MH folders all needed is > just a really simple shell script: [..] > But I have trouble using it. If > I chang

Re: .procmailrc

savanna wrote: > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users > email. I'm currently using: > > :0 : > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users > > :0 : > * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users > > :0 : > * ^From:.

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

Hello Savanna, On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 the mental interface of savanna told: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my

Re: The browser

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Johan Svedberg wrote: > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the > browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press > enter? Sometimes... like when new mail comes in the mailbox I was just in, I sometim

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

savanna [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my .muttrc ;-) ). > > I've searched debian.

Re: Coloring full line in header

On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 06:34:33PM -0700, John Iverson wrote: > * On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 03:34:58PM -0700, John Iverson wrote: > > > * On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, D. J. Bolderman wrote: > > > > > > > I want to color my headers, but something goes wrong h

Updating screen when new mail arrives on samba share

I run mutt (Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28)) on machine A but my mailbox is on machine B. I share the mail directory on machine B via samba to machine A. (I know, using samba to talk between two linux boxes seems odd, but, samba is necessary for the windows boxes so I use it for everyone.) Sitting at

[OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:29:52AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: > > In particular, it is my understanding that there is some > way to use the global (and personal?) address book(s) on the server. Maybe > it's LDAP? If so than you may be in luck. > Perhaps it has something to do with the query

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-26 19:13 -0400: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail wit

Re: .procmailrc

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote: > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users > email. I'm currently using: > > :0 : > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users > > :0 : > * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users

Re: Two minor configuration questions

darren chamberlain wrote: > * Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 09:22]: > > 1. By default, when you delete a message in a mailbox index, mutt > > moves one message *down* by default. Can I change this to move one > > message *up*? > > You can setup a macro: > > macro pager d "" >

Re: Problem with folder-hook - solved

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Gary Johnson wrote: > > You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the > > folder-hook works. Now, is there any way to work around this problem > > ? I tried removing the send-hook . lines, but to no avail. I would > > really like to have this feature. I'm dow

Where config mutt to use lynx and *not* Galeon?

Default Red Hat 7.3 uses Galeon to read html email in mutt. Where do I change this to lynx??? Chris -- ___ Dr. Christian Seberino SPAWAR Systems Center San Diego Code 2363 49590 Lassing Rd. Rm. A339 San Diego, CA 92152-6147 U.S.A. Phone: (619) 553-7940 Fax:

What Country is Mutt developed

Hi Mutts: I'm writing an article that makes mention of Mutt and Vim. I believe Bram Moolenar is from Holland... correct me if I am wrong. And where is the author of Mutt from? Trivia, I know, but wanted to include it in the article. Thanks -- Tim Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote: > how about using hooks on different folder sets > and using unmy_hdr to throw away already set ones? > folder-hook ! +empty "unmy_hdr *; my_hdr From: me " > folder-hook+empty "unmy_hdr *; my_hdr From: me " > this should work. no time for test

Creating Aliases from sent messages?

I've searched the manual high and low on this and come up blank. I want to create a file of aliases based upon messages I've sent, rather than receive. They are all in one folder for ease of access. While creating an alias from a received message is a snap, it appears that, short of typing in l

Re: Colour problem on Solaris

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 11:28:55AM +0100, Chris Green wrote: > As Sven just pointed out I have been using rather old versions of mutt > I have upgraded all my mutts (four of them) to version 1.4i. All of > the Linux ones were no problem, just ./configure with the required > options, make and inst

send-hook and copy

Hey people, Whenever I send an email with a particular subject line, I'd like to not only save a copy to =outbox like always, but I'd like to save an additional copy to another folder. How would I specify the send-hook for that? Thanks, Mike -- Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: .procmailrc

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote: > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users > email. I'm currently using: > > :0 : > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users > > :0 : > * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users

Re: fast conversion of html mail to text

* Sven Guckes said: > well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter > then you were asking for it - so it's your problem. * Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:27]: > It's *not* a problem, for me, anyway. so you are ignoring the extra but superfluous data - fine. > I know about

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

- On Thu, 26.Sep.2002, 13:15EDT, savanna uttered: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my .muttrc ;-) ). One plac

Mutt question: sending attachments from command line

I am attempting to send an html page as an attachment with following Mutt command: mutt -n -F /dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /test/test.html The message is sent, however the page attachment is within the messaage body and only appearing as plain text. I ~~think~ this is because the message is

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt

Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > I think new mailboxes are added to the list, but old ones > are never removed. Exactly. > You need the unmaliboxes command. There is a patch for it > on my homepage and the latest cvs version should include > this command. Thanks. I will try it tonight. Rob. --

Re: The browser

Hi, * Johan Svedberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the > browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press > enter? i have seen such behavior, when the last box i was in was not synced. Then mutt goes back to t

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

Hello Savanna, On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 the mental interface of savanna told: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 the mental interface of savanna told: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my .muttrc ;-) ). >

replying to unwrapped messages with vi

Hello, I use mutt for reading messages and vi for composing/replying. I guess this is more related to vi, but since somebody here most likely has encountered the same problem here goes. If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the message is completely unwrapped, how do I "

Re: The browser

* On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Johan Svedberg wrote: > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're > in the browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some > mailbox and press enter? This happens when you get new mail in the last mailbox you visited after going to the browser. M

Mail-Followup-To/Reply-To alternatives

Hello, Are there headers used by other MUAs that have similar function like Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To? (Probably some users configure their mailers to ignore such headers.) -Hanspeter

Re: charset input trouble

Hello Robert, On Friday, September 20, 2002 at 11:03:48 PM +0200, Robert Lillack wrote: > LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-1 What gives: | $ locale -a | grep ^de_DE | de_DE ...and the output of the little locales checking program at http://www.uni-ulm.de/~s_smasch/Locale/checklocale.c> > set sen

Re: reply-to alternatives

* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 20:12]: > are there alternative headers to Reply-To: > and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs? "we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you." of course there are more headers - and all of them are probably only supported by this one maile

Re: .procmailrc

* On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote: > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users > email. I'm currently using: > > :0 : > * ^To:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-users > > :0 : > * ^Cc:.*(mutt-.*) > mutt-user

Re: redefining mailboxes while running mutt -> unmailboxes does not exist

Sven Guckes wrote: > workaround: quit and restart. in which case you do not > really need to update anything, right? ;-) ...or using Nicolas' patch. It works like a charm. Rob. -- Nöö, vpu jne wn nhpu Mviv. :-)

Re: The browser

* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [26-09-2002 18:46]: > Anyone experinced mutt going to the wrong mailbox when you're in the > browsers mailbox view and place the indicator on some mailbox and press > enter? Err... no? Try refreshing the screen (^L) before pressing enter. See if that solves

Re: mutt and exchange

* Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 13:17]: > Gregory Seidman said: > > Happily, I have mutt playing nice with the Exchange server at work over > > IMAP. This pleases me. Now I am looking for further interaction with the > > Exchange server. In particular, it is my understanding that t

Help on forward

Hi I have many folders managed by Procmail and Mutt, I've a particular one in which i received mails with always the same subject: Eepdate: "FQDN machine name" When i forward this mail i want to always forward it to the same recipient and if possible always have the same body in the forwarded m

Re: .procmailrc

Bernard Massot wrote: > I'm using this one : > :0: > * ^TO.*mutt-users@(mutt.org|.*gbnet.net) > ML/mutt-users I believe that TO.* is redundant, since there's already a ".*" built in to ^TO and ^TO_ -- Will Yardley input: william < @ hq . newdream . net . >

Re: Colour problem on Solaris

On Sep 27 at 11:28, Chris Green spoke: > Error in /home/chris/.mutt/muttrc, line 28: default: no such color Mutt (ncurses?) on NetBsd doesn't like this either. If you have a light background you might choose `brightwhite' instead. Then you might get bright gray. -Hanspeter

Re: Updating screen when new mail arrives on samba share

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 07:50:23PM -0400 or thereabouts, Joel Hammer wrote: > I suppose this is some awkward interaction between mutt and samba. I am not > sure where to start. Is there some simple command in mutt to reread the > mailbox? Have you tried synchronizing the mailbox? ($ is the defau

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

* savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 15:07]: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? Get the source from , or just grab a binary from

Re: .procmailrc

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 11:53:10PM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote: > An erlier mail by Sven Guckes shows this alternatives: > > > * From: Sven Guckes > * Subject: Re: procmail filerting for mutt lists > * Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 13:22:39 -0700 > > [...] > > :0: > * ^TO_mutt-(annou

Re: .procmailrc

* Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-30-02 18:56]: > On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, savanna wrote: > > > A slightly offtopic question - I'm using procmail for my mail filtering, > > just wondering what people are using to catch all of the mutt-users > > email. I'm currently using: > > > > :0 : > > * ^To

Bad Encoding?

My mutt viewer shows: N^X¬µìm\212Ç^Z­¹^u¼¦ºÛÿ²ø\236ÁêÿZ^\ÿÿÿ_^Aô^M;^D@u^LPúì^N¶^WÝE for the attached distribution. I think there was a thread for a problem like this not so long ago. The distribution was encoded by a Mozilla 4.76 mailer. There are 2 attachments. The second 1 was an html

Re: Where config mutt to use lynx and *not* Galeon?

On Sat, Sep 28, 2002 at 09:13:27AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Default Red Hat 7.3 uses Galeon to read html email in mutt. > > Where do I change this to lynx??? in your $HOME/.mailcap, a line like this for instance: text/html; lynx-cs -force_html -stdin (there are several ways to do it)

Re: Problem with folder-hook - command must be *one* parameter

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 05:42:27AM +0200, D. J. Bolderman wrote: > You are right, I also tested it with the subject, and then the > folder-hook works. Now, is there any way to work around this problem ? I > tried removing the send-hook . lines, but to no avail. I would really > like to have this

advfas

asdfasd -- wassalam, dhadhank

a folder-hook question

Hi, mutters. It seems that folder-hook is executed whenever a folder is entered, but is there a 'leave-folder-hook'? I need to reset something back to normal upon leaving a folder, after setting it to folder-specific value in a folder-hook. I cant seem to find such a hook, did I missed anything?

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 savanna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to > using it

Re: download pgpwrap from where?

savanna wrote: > Where do I download pgpewrap from? It's referred to in the sample > muttrc files, for encrypting mail with gpg, however I can't find it > anywhere on the web (though I've found hundreds of references to using > it in my .muttrc ;-) ). It should be included with the Mutt package f

Re: fast conversion of html mail to text

* Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 20:56: > * Sven Guckes said: > > well, if you subscribe to a HTML-only newsletter > > then you were asking for it - so it's your problem. > > * Michael Leone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-26 17:27]: > > It's *not* a problem, for me, any

Re: [OT] LDAP lookups (Was: Re: mutt and exchange)

* David Britton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 30, 02 at 19:46: > On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 08:29:52AM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: > > > > In particular, it is my understanding that there is some > > way to use the global (and personal?) address book(s) on the server. Maybe > > it's LDAP?

Mutt can't find new gpg location

Last night, I installed the just released gnupg-1.2.0. The default location for the new gpg version is /usr/bin opposed to the old /usr/local/bin. After deleting the old, mutt could no longer find gpg. Both dirs are in my PATH. I've put a link from the old to the new, and now mutt works with

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002 at 09:55:08PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote: > Hello, > I use mutt for reading messages and vi for composing/replying. I guess > this is more related to vi, but since somebody here most likely has > encountered the same problem here goes. > > If I receive a message from an outl

Re: charset input trouble

[I don't know why, but this mail reached me just about 5 days too late.] Alain Bench wrote: > > I am *unable* to enter non ASCII characters like the > > german umlauts or the euro sign into Mutt's *internal* > > editor. > > What means «unable» here: You get a bell, no char, and > c

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

Mike Jackson wrote: > If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, > and the message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" > that part which I quote? I would like to be able to do > this automatically. I don't use vi but nearly every editor allows you to call external p

Re: replying to unwrapped messages with vi

On Thu, Sep 26, 2002, Mike Jackson wrote: > If I receive a message from an outlook luser, or similar, and the > message is completely unwrapped, how do I "fix" that part which I quote? > I would like to be able to do this automatically. Not sure about vi, but vim has a wonderful method of wrappi

Re: Mutt question: sending attachments from command line

On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 08:53:24AM -0700, Paul Seniuk wrote: > I am attempting to send an html page as an attachment > with following Mutt command: > > mutt -n -F /dev/null [EMAIL PROTECTED] > < /test/test.html > > The message is sent, however the page attachment is within > the messaage body