On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 09:05:26PM -0600, Rob Park wrote:
> That's awfully restrictive. What if you were in another mbox and you
> wanted to mail mutt-users?
>
> I just use an alias, and send mail normally.
Good for you!
--
Alex Polite
http://plusseven.com/gpg/
Hi!
Maybe this question should go to the development list, however it's more
a user question so I post it here. The OS is RH 7.3.
Here is the commands and the output from them:
~$ smime_keys init
Died at /usr/local/bin/smime_keys line 236.
~$
~$ perl --version
This is perl, v5.6.1 built for i38
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 03:18:23PM +0200, René Clerc wrote:
> What about installing a simple SMTP daemon on your machine, which will
> relay your emails to your office's mailserver, once you're back online?
As it turns out exim was already configured to do this. I just hadn't
given it a chance t
* Timo T. Rajala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the commands and the output from them:
> ~$ smime_keys init
> Died at /usr/local/bin/smime_keys line 236.
Should have included relevant rows from 'smime_keys', here they are:
231 # directory setup routines
232 #
233
234
235 sub mkdir_recurs
On Wed 18-Sep-2002 at 12:45:21AM -0400, PeterKorman wrote:
> >
> > > I guess I need a kind of virtual folder that joins my outgoing
> > > and incoming without duplicating any data.
> >
> > That isn't possible with mutt
>
> I guess since I'm running on linux, with Maildir, I could brute
> force
* John Haviland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 06:53]:
> I'm trying to build mutt 1.4 on solaris 7 but the "make install" fails -
> yes, I know it's really me that's failing here!
>
> My configure command is ./configure --without-iconv --enable-pop
> The tail of make is: (simliar for make install
Timo T. Rajala wrote:
> * Timo T. Rajala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Here is the commands and the output from them:
> > ~$ smime_keys init
> > Died at /usr/local/bin/smime_keys line 236.
>
> Should have included relevant rows from 'smime_keys', here they are:
I've gotten this too. Try copyi
Lance Hoffmeyer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Any ideas? Mutt hangs when I try to compose an email using any editor.
> ps -u `whoami` shows that no editor process is being started. I can
> compose messages as SU.
Does it happen if you set signature=""?
Michael
--
I've run DOOM more in the l
Hi,
I'm currently playing around with mutt 1.5.1i and s/mime (OpenSSL 0.9.6d
9 May 2002).
When sending signed and encrypted mails, OpenSSl (using the example
commandline from smime (1)) sets the Content-Type to:
Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime; name="smime.p7m"
GNUS does the same.
mutt
Hi List,
Hence I am a newbie and use mutt for just a few days, I can not assure
that this question is quite intelligent:
I want to select some messages with 't' and then move all these message
e.g. to another folder or delete them. I can select messages, but what
then? Perhaps a hint or an example
jochen issing wrote:
> Hence I am a newbie and use mutt for just a few days, I can not assure
> that this question is quite intelligent:
> I want to select some messages with 't' and then move all these message
> e.g. to another folder or delete them. I can select messages, but what
> then? Perha
* jochen issing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [18-09-2002 12:11]:
> Hi List,
> Hence I am a newbie and use mutt for just a few days, I can not assure
> that this question is quite intelligent:
> I want to select some messages with 't' and then move all these message
> e.g. to another folder or delete them.
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've gotten this too. Try copying a ca-bundle (ca-bundle.crt) to
> ~/.smime/.
>
> Also make the directories:
> ~/.smime/keys/
> ~/.smime/certificates
> (all with permissions of 0700).
I did so, then I tried 'smime_keys init' again: No problems :-)
Th
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [18-09-2002 11:52]:
> Timo T. Rajala wrote:
> > * Timo T. Rajala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > Here is the commands and the output from them:
> > > ~$ smime_keys init
> > > Died at /usr/local/bin/smime_keys line 236.
> >
> > Should have included relevant
Lotus Notes does archives too. As long as you dont mind
spending 90 seconds to start your mail client
and having it occupy 96 megs of RAM. Itz a very heavy
client.
[JPK]
On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 04:46:05PM -0400, Gil Hauer wrote:
> Outlook does indeed allow the user to archive old email based o
* Anders Helmersson [2002-09-12 20:45]:
> > well - "reply" to your own mail and add the missing info.
> > you could use the resend-mail command, of course,
> > but that might start a new thread.
>
> What concerns me with this method is that in-reply-to will include my own
> mail id, even if it is
I think I have narrowed down the issue I am experiencing to being mutt
specific.
When I am composing / editing a messge in mutt, it seems that my .vimrc
is not being fully read, if at all. Also, vim-specific features like
tab expansion do not work (that's one I use a lot).
Is there a way to twe
* Rob Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-17 22:49]:
> Alas! darren chamberlain spake thus:
> > * Alex Polite <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-17 08:22]:
> > > How do I start composing a new message to a mailing list? What I
> > > usually do now is push "L" for list-reply the remove the body and
> > >
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-17 22:25]:
> Presumably if you use the patch which has RFC 2369 support, there might
> be a 'list-post' option, which would be nice In fact, mutt could
> probably add a 'list-post' option (which would post a new message to
> list(s) existing in the c
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 08:23]:
> Is there a way to tweak the way mutt lauches vi to get these features
> to run in a 'vimmish' way?
To what is $editor set? If it is set to 'vi', then you might be getting
either vim in compatible mode, or not vim (i.e., the default vi on yo
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 12:24]:
> I think I have narrowed down the issue I am
> experiencing to being mutt specific.
>
> When I am composing / editing a messge in mutt, it
> seems that my .vimrc is not being fully read, if at
> all. Also, vim-specific features like tab expans
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
:ve is standard.
(:version is also recognized by all of the vi's that I recall -
including elvis).
> with cp set will still respond to :version, while elvis will not (well,
> it
* René Clerc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [18-09-2002 11:52]:
> > Also make the directories:
> > ~/.smime/keys/
> > ~/.smime/certificates
> > (all with permissions of 0700).
>
> But isn't this what smime_keys init is supposed to do?
Yes. But it also creates em
* Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-15 21:16]:
> jz wrote:
> > In my experience it is not so slow. Deleting a message from a
> > 3-message maildir takes 3 to 5 seconds at most on my 4 yrs old
> > celeron.
>
> It's not the processor speed, but the filesystem that's the main issue
> her
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 09:04]:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
>
> > vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
>
> :ve is standard.
> (:version is also recognized by all of the vi's that I recall -
> including elvis).
OK, I
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 09:04]:
> > On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, darren chamberlain wrote:
> >
> > > vim has a :version command, which other vi clones don't seem to; vim
> >
> > :ve is standard.
> > (:version is also recognized b
I just did some trivial tests.
I'm working on something with 34924 files in a single directory
on linux ext3. I timed a simple file remove it took 0.044 seconds.
Most people I know dont call this a low end system. Based on this
data I think that this particular machine can tolerate any overhea
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 02:46:16PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> and you don't want to share you #editor value with us? hint hint
> besides, you might want to upgrade to vim 6.1 ...
>
vi launched from a shell says:
:ve
VIM - Vi IMproved 5.
I am not sure what mutt was defaulting to, but by looking at the sample
.muttrc files on the mutt.org web site, I saw examples of the "set
editor=" option.
By explicitely adding "set editor="/usr/bin/vi"", I get the correct
results!
now :ve in the mutt composer gives me the same version info th
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:33]:
> > > one of the annoying things about vim-users is that most
> > > of them don't know much about vi, and tend to ascribe
> > > lots of things to vim that are standard in vi.
> >
> > Hey, Sven, calm down, will ya? ;)
>
> He's tamer than h
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:56]:
> vi launched from a shell says:
> :ve
> VIM - Vi IMproved 5.6 (2000 Jan 16, compiled May 1 2000 16:14:28)
> Included patches: 1-62, 64-70
>
> from inside mutt:
> :ve
> version 1.79 (10/23/96) The CSRG, University of California, Berkeley.
now,
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 16:06]:
> By explicitely adding "set editor="/usr/bin/vi"",
> I get the correct results!
and whow is this different from "set editor=vi"?
now, that's a surprise.
set editor="vi -u none"
set editor="/usr/bin/vi -u none"
any difference there?
Sven
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:33]:
> > > > one of the annoying things about vim-users is that most
> > > > of them don't know much about vi, and tend to ascribe
> > > > lots of things to vim that are standard in vi.
> > >
> > > Hey
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 16:37]:
> On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 15:33]:
> > > (we don't often quarrel anymore - I
> > > seem to recall this was once an issue)
> >
> > now what did we quarrel about? who won
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > From: "Thomas E. Dickey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: vi startup (not vim?)
> > Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 12:36:55 -0400 (EDT)
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > cc: <[E
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 18:27]:
> * Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 16:06]:
> > By explicitely adding "set editor="/usr/bin/vi"",
> > I get the correct results!
>
> and whow is this different from "set editor=vi"?
> now, that's a surprise.
>
> set editor="vi -u
Hi,
i'd like to delete all threads that consist of messages which are older
than 2 months. i thought of something like this
D~r >2m
T~r !~D
;^U
but ^U does not work with tag-prefix. any ideas?
thx in advance
bd
ps: pls cc me since im not on the list, thank you.
--
PGP/GPG Key at htt
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002 at 4:50:14 PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_T. _da_Costa?="
>> It's broken: there is a space in the encoded word, and there is no
>> email address.
> Oh, there was a real address, I just didn't paste it in. ;)
Et merde! :-(
> I
darren chamberlain wrote:
> * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-17 22:25]:
> > Presumably if you use the patch which has RFC 2369 support, there might
> > be a 'list-post' option, which would be nice In fact, mutt could
> > probably add a 'list-post' option (which would post a new mes
jz wrote:
> * Will Yardley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-15 21:16]:
> > jz wrote:
> > > In my experience it is not so slow. Deleting a message from a
> > > 3-message maildir takes 3 to 5 seconds at most on my 4 yrs old
> > > celeron.
> > It's not the processor speed, but the filesystem that's
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-18 22:11 +0200]:
> i'd like to delete all threads that consist of messages which are older
> than 2 months. i thought of something like this
>
> D~r >2m
> T~r !~D
> ;^U
>
> but ^U does not work with tag-prefix. any ideas?
Perhaps does the following patch what you wa
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 06:27:43PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 16:06]:
> > By explicitely adding "set editor="/usr/bin/vi"",
> > I get the correct results!
>
> and whow is this different from "set editor=vi"?
> now, that's a surprise.
>
> set editor
I upgraded my mutt from 1.2.5 to 1.4i and now when I do imap-fetch-mail
it says "Fetching message..." but doesn't retrieve messages. This worked
before I upgraded. I'm on a Redhat 7.2 system and used this SRPM:
$ rpm -qi mutt
Name: mutt Relocations: (not relocate
Zile runs fine by itself.
Lance
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 10:08 pm, Rob Park wrote:
> Alas! Lance Hoffmeyer spake thus:
> > $EDITOR is set to zile. It used to work fine. Something just recently
> > has happened but I can't think of anything that I have done except run
> > programs.
>
> Wha
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 16:06]:
> By explicitely adding "set editor="/usr/bin/vi"",
> I get the correct results!
* Sven Guckes wrote:
> set editor="vi -u none"
> set editor="/usr/bin/vi -u none"
>
> any difference there?
* Johan Svedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-18 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue 2002-09-17 at 01:32:22 -0700, Jeremy Lin wrote:
>> So how do people right now search for multiple occurences of a pattern
>> anyway?
>
> By pressing 'n', like in 'less'. :-)
Ah, indeed -- I was
46 matches
Mail list logo
