On 2002-09-10 10:40:46 -0300, Bruno Lustosa wrote:
>I received a message from someone using outlook containing an
>email attached (*.eml). Unfortunately, outlook sends the
>attachment as "application/octet-stream", so mutt can't really
>recognize it automatically. Then I open the message in mu
Greetings, fellow Mutterers.
The problem is to:
a) Archive outgoing mail to a local mail folder named in a header.
b) Archive the same outgoing mail on a server, in similar fashion.
The attempted solution so far is:
a)
my_hdr Fcc: default_project_name
b)
my_hdr X-Topic: default_pro
* "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 01:58]:
> Can I see a filtering example from your .procmailrc?
> Say, to filter this mailing list?
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 05:46]:
> No, because the address subscribed to this list is johan-mutt and I have
>
> #cat .qmail
* Erik Christiansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 09:37]:
> The problem is to:
> a) Archive outgoing mail to a local mail folder named in a header.
fcc-hook
> b) Archive the same outgoing mail on a server, in similar fashion.
Bcc
> The attempted solution so far is:
> a) my_hdr Fcc: default_p
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 13:32]:
> * "Michael P. Soulier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 01:58]:
> > Can I see a filtering example from your .procmailrc?
> > Say, to filter this mailing list?
> * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 05:46]:
> > No, because the address subsc
* Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 06:32]:
> Since I've added source lines for a couple scripts, when
> I start up mutt, the screen flashes several times.
> source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/"|
> source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/people/"|
> That sort of
* Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 14:37]:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:08:44PM +0200, Michael Tatge wrote:
> > Pedro Alves ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > > I want to make a compose macro that verifies the from-address and changes
> > > the fcc according to that value...
> > >
> >
Thomas Roessler [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On 2002-09-10 10:40:46 -0300, Bruno Lustosa wrote:
>
> >I received a message from someone using outlook containing an
> >email attached (*.eml). Unfortunately, outlook sends the
> >attachment as "application/octet-stream", so mutt can't really
> >re
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 10:11:22AM +1000, Iain Truskett wrote:
> :0:
> * ^Sender: owner-mutt-(dev|users)@mutt.org
> apps-mutt/
the first line can actually be written as follows:
:0
the second colon tells procmail to lock an mbox file which
isn't necessary for maildir.
--
Peter Abplanalp
PGP:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 05:46]:
> > No, because the address subscribed to this list is johan-mutt and I have
> >
> > #cat .qmail-mutt
> > ~/Maildir/.mutt/
> >
> > That's a lot better that filtering based on som
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:33:23PM +1000, Erik Christiansen wrote:
>Alternatively, I don't suppose it's possible to use send-hook to put
>the outgoing mail through awk, to generate X-Topic from Fcc, before
>it is scrubbed? Now that would allow me to go to town!
i would suggest you cr
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 13:45]:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > * Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 05:46]:
> > > No, because the address subscribed to this list is johan-mutt and I have
> > >
> > > #cat .qmail-mutt
> > >
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:44:44AM -0600 or thereabouts, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
qmail has totally eliminated the need for procmail on my mailserver by
using .qmail files. Still use it after poping mail to my box, where
Mutt reads
Folks,
is there a new release of mutt (1.5.1i) available?
wbr,
--lpr
Lukas Ruf Bellariastr. 11 CH-8002 Zuerich +41 1 2813545
http://www.lpr.chhttp://www.maremma.ch
http://www.{{topsy,nodeos}.net,{promethos,netbeast,rawip}.org}
Greetings.
With no limit set, I would expect %L in $status_format to expand to
either 0K (that's "zero-K", not "okay") or the full size of the mailbox
(I do not know which of these behaviors is intended). Apparently it
expands to both (finish reading before you remark please). When
intially in
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> is there a new release of mutt (1.5.1i) available?
this is the cvs version. it hasn't been "released" afaik.
--
Peter Abplanalp
PGP: pgp.mit.edu
msg30874/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > is there a new release of mutt (1.5.1i) available?
>
> this is the cvs version. it hasn't been "released" afaik.
>
Do you consider it stable?
--lpr
--
Lukas Ruf Bellariastr
* Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 14:36]:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Peter T. Abplanalp wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 04:20:41PM +0200, Lukas Ruf wrote:
> > > is there a new release of mutt (1.5.1i) available?
> > this is the cvs version. it hasn't been "released" afaik.
> Do you consi
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> bottom line: use cvs - or wait for 1.6 to be released.
>
Ok, got the point, mutt follows a numbering scheme similar to Linux'?
Thanks,
--lpr
On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:56:39PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 06:32]:
> > Since I've added source lines for a couple scripts, when
> > I start up mutt, the screen flashes several times.
> > source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/"|
> >
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [11-09-2002 16:57]:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 01:56:39PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > * Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 06:32]:
> > > Since I've added source lines for a couple scripts, when
> > > I start up mutt, the screen flashes several t
* Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 06:32]:
> source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/"|
> source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/people/"|
* Sven Guckes wrote:
> source filename
> source filename|
> "filename foo" is *not* a filename, i suppose.
* [EMAIL PROTECTE
* On 2002.09.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Lukas Ruf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
>
> > bottom line: use cvs - or wait for 1.6 to be released.
> >
>
> Ok, got the point, mutt follows a numbering scheme similar to Linux'?
Yes.
I'm not sure why a
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 17:23]:
> * Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-10 06:32]:
> > source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/lists/"|
> > source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.sh ~/.Mail/people/"|
> * Sven Guckes wrote:
> > source filename
> > source filename|
> > "f
* On 2002.09.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Sven Dogbert Guckes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "filename" stands for the name of a file. no more - no less.
Wrong, Sven.
> > Sometimes even reading the manual is not sufficient.
>
> yep - understanding it is required, too. *ehem*
Indee
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 15:52]:
> :source 'echo "alias foobar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"'|
> the screen will "flash". But the alias
> (that wasn't defined before) will work, too!
aha - so the pipe symbol at the end forces an evaluation.. hmm..
$ cat /tmp/test
echo 'set s
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 16:09]:
> The pipe symbol needs to be inside the quotation
> marks, but it's not allowed to take arguments.
> source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.lists.sh |"
> source "~/.mutt/hooks/folder.recip.people.sh |"
why use quotation marks at all then?
Morning,
I'm trying to get mutt to call an external command from a send-hook
like in the following muttrc line:
send-hook . '!sched.log Testing send hook\n'
but it always just says "!sched.log command not found" after setting
to and subject from a message. Is it possible to use ! in a send
hoo
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 18:08]:
> Ryan:
> The pipe symbol needs to be inside the quotation marks, but it's not
> allowed to take arguments.
What no arguments? Worked fine for me - see previous mail.
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 01:54:38PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > BTW, why did this post show up in my inbox rather than in my
> > mutt folder? My procmailrc searches for "^TO.*mutt-users"..
>
> please explain why you use ".*" here.
Because whoever's procmailrc I copied when I was first learning
I tried to upgrade from mutt 1.2.5 to 1.4 this morning, but when I
started mutt after the upgrade, I could see the subjects all the emails
in my inbox in the viewer, but when I try to view one of the emails, all
I got was a blank page. Using 'e' to edit the email pulled the entire
email correctly
Paul Brannan wrote:
> I tried to upgrade from mutt 1.2.5 to 1.4 this morning, but when I
> started mutt after the upgrade, I could see the subjects all the emails
> in my inbox in the viewer, but when I try to view one of the emails, all
> I got was a blank page. Using 'e' to edit the email pulle
* On 2002.09.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Johan Almqvist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020911 18:08]:
> > Ryan:
> > The pipe symbol needs to be inside the quotation marks, but it's not
> > allowed to take arguments.
>
> What no arguments? Worked fine
Hi, all --
...and then David Champion said...
%
...
% of the word "release". There's a 1.5.1 tarball at
% ftp://ftp.mutt.org/mutt/devel/mutt-1.5.1i.tar.gz, just like the devel
YAY! YIPPEE! WONDERFUL!
Good deal.
HAND
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's p
* David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 15:22]:
> (This was when I changed my muttrc to call m4 as a preprocessor on my
> real muttrc, as some might recall.)
I recall this, and also recall a promise to post said m4 config to the
list, so we could see what it looked like...
(darren)
--
* Burton Samograd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 16:55]:
> I'm trying to get mutt to call an external command
> from a send-hook like in the following muttrc line:
> send-hook . '!sched.log Testing send hook\n'
>
> but it always just says "!sched.log command not found" after setting
> to and su
> have you tried by calling the script with its
> full path, ie with "!/path/script foo bar"?
> this *ought* to work!
i've tried a number of variations with path and other commands (like
"!echo Testing > ~/mutt.log" ) and i keep getting the unknown command
error :-/ i know this *should* work but
Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Burton Samograd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 16:55]:
> > I'm trying to get mutt to call an external command
> > from a send-hook like in the following muttrc line:
> > send-hook . '!sched.log Testing send hook\n'
> >
> > but it always just says "!sched.log command not f
David --
...and then darren chamberlain said...
%
% * David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-11 15:22]:
% > (This was when I changed my muttrc to call m4 as a preprocessor on my
% > real muttrc, as some might recall.)
%
% I recall this, and also recall a promise to post said m4 config to t
>
> No, it won't. send-hook only allows you to execute configuration
> commands, like you would put in a muttrc. What he's trying to do is
> execute one of Mutt's interactive functions. There is no "exec"
> configuration command which allows you to run an external program.
Ah, i thought that
* On 2002.09.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Michael Elkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, it won't. send-hook only allows you to execute configuration
> commands, like you would put in a muttrc. What he's trying to do is
> execute one of Mutt's interactive functions. There is no "ex
Hi,
I have several email aliases that I use frequently, when I reply to an
email, i'd like to send as whoever the email was addressed to, automatically.
How can I do this?
Also, when I send to certain email addresses (specifically mailing lists,
etc) I'd like to use a specific email alias a
Burton Samograd wrote:
> Ah, i thought that might be the problem. Would there be any way of
> actually doing what i'm trying to do? Maybe setting up a macro and
> then calling that from send-hook?
You could try to use the push command to simulate keystrokes, but that
won't be executed until the
Nick Jennings wrote:
> I have several email aliases that I use frequently, when I reply to an
> email, i'd like to send as whoever the email was addressed to, automatically.
> How can I do this?
see $reverse_name in the mutt manual.
Alas! Burton Samograd spake thus:
> >
> > No, it won't. send-hook only allows you to execute configuration
> > commands, like you would put in a muttrc. What he's trying to do is
> > execute one of Mutt's interactive functions. There is no "exec"
> > configuration command which allows you to r
Hi again,
Now that my first problem is soved (calling my command from a
send-hook) now I'm running into the second part of what i'm trying to
do. Is there any way to access the To: and Subject: from the message
that is begin set? I've already set them before the hook is called,
so i'm thinking
I get the following error during 'make install' and I don't understand.
make[1]: *** No rule to make target mime.h', needed by ttach.o'. Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory /mnt/scratch/KeeP/mutt-1.5.1'
make: *** [install-recursive] Error 1
Any help will be appreciated.
--
Patrick Shanahan
Re
The attached patch copies the functionality of the display-address function
to display the message subject, by default bound to S. This is useful if
your term isn't infinitely wide and/or you have a crowded $index_format.
I've been using a version of this since 1.3.2x without any problems; it's
48 matches
Mail list logo
