SOLVED : Re: Problems with hooks

2002-09-04 Thread Preben Randhol
Preben Randhol <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/09/2002 (11:38) : > Is there a way so I can set up a default hook which will be used for > all folders that do not have a special folder-hook? If not I have to > set up folder hooks for all the folders which is a bit cumbersome. Please ignore my ques

Re: overriding headers - is version info a security hole?

2002-09-04 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
* Peter T. Abplanalp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 17:12 (12:38:00)] > i fail to see how knowing the version of mutt you are running will > give any attacker enough information to hack your box. Hints... take a carefull peek at the mail headers... than you get noy only the MUA, but the first M

mutt colors

2002-09-04 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
Hi all, one of my colorsets is color hdrdefault blackcyan The text, but _only_ the text of my headers is black on cyan. Is it possible to get the whole lines backgrounded in cyan? Tested in xterm, aterm and ttyx. Thx in advance Ciao Elimar -- The way to source is always uphill!

Re: mutt colors

2002-09-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > Hi all, > > one of my colorsets is > > color hdrdefault blackcyan > > The text, but _only_ the text of my headers is black on cyan. Is it > possible to get the whole lines backgrounded in cyan? Tested in > xterm, ater

Re: mutt colors

2002-09-04 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas Dickey told: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > one of my colorsets is > > > > color hdrdefault blackcyan > > > > The text, but _only_ the text of my headers is black on cyan. Is i

Re: mutt colors

2002-09-04 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 02:08:45PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Thomas Dickey told: > > > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 01:49:26PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > one of my colorsets is > > > > > > color hdrdefault black

location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Bo Peng
Hi, Everyone, Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the email. Can I let it be put before the quoted text? Thanks. -- Bo Peng Department of Statistics Rice University http://www.stat.rice.edu/~bpeng Office: DH2076, (713) 348-2863

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> / 2002-09-04 10:24:57 + (-0500): > Hi, Everyone, > > Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the email. Can I let > it be put before the quoted text? yes. use Outlook. -- FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE 5:32PM up 14 days, 23:25, 8 users, load averages: 0.02

QP/base64 issues

2002-09-04 Thread Jonathan Perkin
Hello, This has been bugging me all afternoon, so it's time I let people who know what they're doing tell me what I'm doing wrong :) Basically, I want mail sent with foreign chars such as £ å é etc to *not* be sent as QP or base64. Now, with % /usr/sbin/sendmail -t From: me To: you Subject: bl

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Heiko Heil
* Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09/04/2002 18:01]: > Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the email. Can I let > it be put before the quoted text? This discussion (Message-ID 8gcg1a$qte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]) may be helpful for you. -- Best regards Heiko

imap+proxy+mutt

2002-09-04 Thread thunder hill
Hi I am using mutt to read the mails from imap server. by mutt -f{imap server}. but when i try to send the mails outside the lan its not working(bouncing back). whereas inside mails are reaching inside the lan. I am behind the proxy. mail server and proxy are running on same machines.there are s

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Bo Peng
I am sorry but I could not find this message. Could you tell me its subject or date? Is it in mutt-user group? Thanks. Bo On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 08:16:12PM +0200, Heiko Heil wrote: > * Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09/04/2002 18:01]: > > Mutt automatically put the signature at the end of the ema

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread -dsr-
Bo Peng wrote: > I am sorry but I could not find this message. Could you tell me its > subject or date? Is it in mutt-user group? > > > This discussion (Message-ID 8gcg1a$qte$[EMAIL PROTECTED]) may > > be helpful for you. It's a message ID. Go search Google Groups for it; you'll get a 12 messag

mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Gregory Seidman
I looked around for information on how to do this, but didn't find any. I would like to be able to deal with my email using mutt, as I have for a year or two. Unfortunately, the job I now have uses MS Exchange for email and I can't seem to get mutt talking to it. When I run mutt -f imap://server/

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Elimar Riesebieter
On Wed, 04 Sep 2002 the mental interface of Gregory Seidman told: > I looked around for information on how to do this, but didn't find any. I > would like to be able to deal with my email using mutt, as I have for a > year or two. Unfortunately, the job I now have uses MS Exchange for email > and

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Omen Wild
Quoting Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, Sep 04 15:21: > > Unfortunately, the job I now have uses MS Exchange for email and I > can't seem to get mutt talking to it. At my previous job it took me a while to get fetchmail working with Exchange. It has been a while, but I seem to rememb

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Leone
Elimar Riesebieter said: > No! The admin has to enable imap. Does he knows how to? I believe that IMAP is enabled by default on Exchange (it was on mine, I believe). So if it's not running, the admin must have turned it off. -- PGP Fingerprint: 0AA8 DC47 CB63 AE3F C739 6BF9 9AB4 1EF6 5AA5 BCD

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Leone
Gregory Seidman said: > > When I run mutt -f imap://server/ it asks for my username and password, > then tells me that the login failed. The username and password are > right, since I use them successfully with Outlook. Much the same thing > happens with Mozilla mail, incidentally. Is there any w

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Gregory Seidman
Michael Leone sez: } } Elimar Riesebieter said: } } > No! The admin has to enable imap. Does he knows how to? } } I believe that IMAP is enabled by default on Exchange (it was on mine, I } believe). So if it's not running, the admin must have turned it off. I have determined that IMAP is enabl

Syncing problems

2002-09-04 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
Hi folks! I'm using a compresed folder for this list as a local archive... it has about 1.200 selected mails (hint about list content quality), and some weeks ago I started having a problem that annoys me a lot. My procmail moves the list new mails into mail/m.lists/inet-tech/mutt-users and I mo

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread David Rock
On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:27:19PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: > Michael Leone sez: > > Well, I guessed a couple of workgroups, which didn't work, but I don't know > what workgroup I am in. Is there any way to tell from Windows XP > Professional (which is where I have Outlook working)? I don't

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Bo Peng
OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules. I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my reply) before non-important part (quote) and keep my signature closer to the main bo

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Rob Reid
At 7:17 PM EDT on September 4 Bo Peng sent off: > I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has > nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my > reply) before non-important part (quote) I understand your line of reasoning, but I think most peop

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Patrick
* Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-04-02 18:22]: > > OK. I found the messages and I am not glad about those so-called rules. > I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has > nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my > reply) before non-importan

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Charles Cazabon
* Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [09-04-02 18:22]: > > It is natural (to me) to put important part (my reply) before non-important > part (quote) If the quote isn't important, leave it out altogether. Notice how I didn't quote all of the text of the original message? Notice how much easier to rea

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Corren Vorwerk
Hi Gregory! i also had the prob with my mutt. without putting my password into my muttrc - i think its much saver on most computers but mine at home - i found something strange out. when i "backspaced" on the password-question and tham typed my password it worked. so there was some prob with th

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Bo Peng
The discussion has gone closely to personal attack. I might have triggered some anti-M$ feelings. :-( > > I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this has > > nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important part (my > > reply) before non-important part (quote)

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Iain Truskett
* Bo Peng ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 Sep 2002 11:40]: [...] > I do not see anything wrong with quoting the whole message. It is a > good reference if the reader need to read it or it can be ignored > easily. But I already have the previous messages. I can press P and read them. A much better refere

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Will Yardley
Bo Peng wrote: >>> I THINK it is better to put the reply BEFORE quoted text and this >>> has nothing to do with M$. It is natural (to me) to put important >>> part (my reply) before non-important part (quote) >> I understand your line of reasoning, but I think most people (if they >> haven't b

Re: location of signature.

2002-09-04 Thread Bo Peng
'set sig_on_top' is all I need. Just as Mutt user's manual says: 'It is strongly recommended that you do not set this variable unless you really know what you are doing, and are prepared to take some heat from netiquette guardians.', I was taught some lessons by the guardians. :-) Thank you. Bo

A couple of questions

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Herman
I have a couple of questions about a couple of things. 1. I have a custom attribution string for responding to e-mails that I send to people at work. The attribution use ~t to show to whom the previous, quoted e-mail was addressed. However, if the e-mail is addressed to more then o

Re: mutt and exchange

2002-09-04 Thread Mike Leone
* David Rock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 04, 02 at 18:05: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 04:27:19PM -0400, Gregory Seidman wrote: > > Michael Leone sez: Just to be clear .. I did *not* say the following. > > > > Well, I guessed a couple of workgroups, which didn't work, but I don't know >

Re: A couple of questions

2002-09-04 Thread Andre Berger
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline * Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-04 23:06 -0400: > 5. Is there a way to force Mutt to reload the .muttrc without quiting > and launching? :source ~/.muttrc -Andre --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Con

Re: QP/base64 issues

2002-09-04 Thread David Ellement
On 020904, at 17:57:25, Jonathan Perkin wrote > Basically, I want mail sent with foreign chars such as £ å é etc > to *not* be sent as QP or base64. > > Unfortunately, no matter how I configure mutt, I cannot seem to > get it to behave: > > unset allow_8bit, unset use_8bitmime: > Content-T

Re: A couple of questions

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Elkins
Michael Herman wrote: > 1. I have a custom attribution string for responding to e-mails that > I send to people at work. The attribution use ~t to show to whom > the previous, quoted e-mail was addressed. However, if the e-mail > is addressed to more then one person, only the first

Re: QP/base64 issues

2002-09-04 Thread David Ellement
I noticed this in the headers to your message as received on my end: X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by inet34.rd.bbc.co.uk X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hpsdlfsa.sdd.hp.com So it seems your machine won't allow 8bit out, while

Re: A couple of questions

2002-09-04 Thread David Ellement
On 020904, at 23:51:01, Andre Berger wrote > * Michael Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-09-04 23:06 -0400: > > 5. Is there a way to force Mutt to reload the .muttrc without quiting > > and launching? > > :source ~/.muttrc I find it helpful to include the lines: reset all unhook *

Re: QP/base64 issues

2002-09-04 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 21:05 -0700 04 Sep 2002, David Ellement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I noticed this in the headers to your message as received on my end: > > X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable > by inet34.rd.bbc.co.uk > So it seems your machine won't allow 8bit out, It's more like

Re: A couple of questions

2002-09-04 Thread Michael Tatge
Michael Elkins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > The development branch now has a reply-hook. Neat. :) Michael -- "...Unix, MS-DOS, and Windows NT (also known as the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly)." (By Matt Welsh) PGP-Key: http://www-stud.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/~tatgeml/public.key