When I'm answering to a mail sent to a work mailing list I want to
change my From to the mailing list address and also CC to the mailing
list address so that replier doesn't have to honor reply-to and he
will never reply to me directly but always to the list. And also
other people at work reading
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 08:32:29AM -0400,
Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 48 lines which said:
> But you're breaking it for the 90% or whatever of messages that have proper
> formatting.
Right but it is easier than education people :-{
> You can also try explaining to your c
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> to write these to a file so he can monitor them.
> a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat?
>
> Sven
of-course not but an added functionality.
--
Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > Oh, I have a feeling it's more difficult than I want it
> > to be, but I would like the change (I hit just
> > about every time I go to edit a string in mutt).
>
> welcome to the club! ;-)
Ooh, can I join too? Not for mutt, but when I have to use so
Saku Ytti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Problem is, mutt doesn't allow writing Cc to same address as From,
> maybe a sanity check, I don't know.
Hm, I can't reproduce that here. Mutt 1.4i
> This is what I'm looking for:
> folder-hook list 'my_hdr From: My Name
> folder-hook list 'my_hdr Cc: L
Saku Ytti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> This is what I'm looking for:
> folder-hook list 'my_hdr From: My Name
> folder-hook list 'my_hdr Cc: List
^ ^
Btw. the missing "'" is a copy/paste error I presume.
Michael
--
We come to bury DOS, not to
* On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> to write these to a file so he can monitor them.
> a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat?
* Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-16 12:34]:
> of-course not but an added functionality.
the distinction between bloat and
On 020816, at 18:23:02, Sven Guckes wrote
> * On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:50:20PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > to write these to a file so he can monitor them.
> > a menu would be nicer, of course, but... bloat?
>
> * Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-16 12:34]:
> > of-course not but an a
Hi Sven,
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16. Aug. 2002]:
> * Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-16 12:34]:
> Vikram - can you answer these questions for me?
I can -- i was the original poster.
> > of-course not but an added functionality.
[...]
> i suppose there you would use it to l
I recently installed Spamassassin and have been successfully using it
with Mutt and Procmail. So far it's doing a great job of catching spam,
but the ocassional one does get through.
When one does get through, I've been submitting it by hitting S in the
index, which pipes it to spamassassin -d
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-07-29 19:08 -0400:
> Alas! Andre Berger spake thus:
> > By the way, what would an exmaple
> > procmail rule to add a sender to the spamassassin blacklist look
> > like?
>
> Probably something along the lines of this (but I'm a little rusty;
> the flag
* Andre Berger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2002-07-29 19:08 -0400:
> > Alas! Andre Berger spake thus:
> > > By the way, what would an exmaple
> > > procmail rule to add a sender to the spamassassin blacklist look
> > > like?
Read `perldoc Mail::SpamAssasU
* Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-16 19:02]:
> I recently installed Spamassassin and have been successfully
> using it with Mutt and Procmail. So far it's doing a great
> job of catching spam, but the ocassional one does get through.
>
> When one does get through, I've been submitting i
13 matches
Mail list logo
