Re: Bug handling long lines ?

2002-06-26 Thread Pedro Alves
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > It's encoded with quoted-printable, AFAIK quoted-printable requires > the sender to a maximal line length of (I think) 100 bytes, after > which you have to add at least a soft line break. This "problem" has > been discussed on

Re: Bug handling long lines ?

2002-06-26 Thread Pedro Alves
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: > > About your problem... Are really your sure this is Mutt's fault? Absolutly! > > With default settings (try ':unauto_view *' first) won't display your > html message, it will just say something like: > >

Switching between mailboxes with new mails

2002-06-26 Thread dak
Hi, Recently i had a system crash and i've lost all my datas. After having re-installed a new system, i reinstalled mutt. I built a .muttrc (the same i had before). But the problem is when i run mutt, before when i had new mails in my ~/Mail/ directory (mails filtered with procmail), mutt tells i

Re: Switching between mailboxes with new mails

2002-06-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* dak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 10:00]: > Recently i had a system crash and i've lost all my data. After > having re-installed a new system, i reinstalled mutt. I built a > .muttrc (the same i had before). But the problem is when i run > mutt, before when i had new mails in my ~/Mail/ dir

Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread Pedro Alves
Hello. Is it possible to configure mutt to automatically lunch the external viewer defined in mailcap inside the mutt window? For instance, lunch w3m or lynx when the type is text/html without having to see [-- text/html is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --])] ? Thanks in advance --

Re: mailboxes with new mails in status_format -> %b

2002-06-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* dak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 10:00]: > Recently i had a system crash and i've lost all my data. After > having re-installed a new system, i reinstalled mutt. I built a > .muttrc (the same i had before). But the problem is when i run > mutt, before when i had new mails in my ~/Mail/ dir

Re: Bug handling long lines ?

2002-06-26 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
* Pedro Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 09:44 +0100]: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 01:58:45AM +0200, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote: > > It's encoded with quoted-printable, AFAIK quoted-printable requires > > the sender to a maximal line length of (I think) 100 bytes, after > > which you have to add a

Re: Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread Cedric Duval
Pedro Alves wrote: > Hello. Is it possible to configure mutt to automatically lunch the external > viewer defined in mailcap inside the mutt window? For instance, lunch w3m > or lynx when the type is text/html without having to see > [-- text/html is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --])]

Re: Extracting a PGP signature? -> command extract-keys

2002-06-26 Thread Sven Guckes
* Phil Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-25 18:01]: > People have sent me some PGP signed emails in PGP/MIME format > (with signature as a separate attachment). I would like to turn > these into standalone files with just the contents and the > signatures. Does anyone here know how I'd go abo

Re: Extracting a PGP signature?

2002-06-26 Thread David T-G
Phil -- I've held off on a response since I don't have a sure answer, but since you haven't gotten what you need yet at all, ... ...and then Phil Gregory said... % % People have sent me some PGP signed emails in PGP/MIME format (with % signature as a separate attachment). I would like to turn

Re: Extracting a PGP signature?

2002-06-26 Thread Peter T. Abplanalp
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 01:59:41PM -0400, Phil Gregory wrote: > People have sent me some PGP signed emails in PGP/MIME format (with > signature as a separate attachment). I would like to turn these into > standalone files with just the contents and the signatures. Does > anyone here know how I'd

Re: Mason 1.10. Doesn't report the error line number ?

2002-06-26 Thread Pedro Alves
I'm sorry!!! Wrong mailing list! On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:12:16PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Hi. > > > With mason 1.10 I still get this kind of errors: > > error in file: > /opt/apache_1.3.23/mason/obj/sebol/inner/stocks/production/index.html > line 45: > Global symbol "$delivery"

Re: Extracting a PGP signature?

2002-06-26 Thread Phil Gregory
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 08:20 -0500]: > AFAIK you're out of luck. It's my understanding that mutt feeds to gpg > the entire body, including MIME headers, for signing and then attaches > the signature after that -- which means that just saving the body off is > insufficient. A

Re: Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:17:53PM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote: > Pedro Alves wrote: > > Hello. Is it possible to configure mutt to automatically lunch the external > > viewer defined in mailcap inside the mutt window? For instance, lunch w3m > > or lynx when the type is text/html without having to

Re: Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread David T-G
Gary, et al -- ...and then Gary Johnson said... % % On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:17:53PM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote: % > Pedro Alves wrote: % > > Hello. Is it possible to configure mutt to automatically lunch the external % > > viewer defined in mailcap inside the mutt window? For instance, lunch w

Re: Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread Pedro Alves
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:21:59AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:17:53PM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote: > > Pedro Alves wrote: > > > Hello. Is it possible to configure mutt to automatically lunch the external > > > viewer defined in mailcap inside the mutt window? For instanc

Re: Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:27:03AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Gary, et al -- > > ...and then Gary Johnson said... > % > % On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 02:17:53PM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote: > % > Pedro Alves wrote: > % > > Hello. Is it possible to configure mutt to automatically lunch the external > %

Re: Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread Pedro Alves
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:12:45AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > > % menu. I don't think mutt currently supports that. > > > > In that case, what about something like > > > > msg-hook .'set pager=builtin' > > msg-hook 'set pager=lynx' > > > > or so? If you want lynx as a pager, ju

folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-26 Thread Vikram Goyal
Hello Dear Mutters, I am using version 1.3.28i. I have defined a folder-hook as: folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash" But the error coming is 'push too many arguments' How can I resolve this. Please point me where I am wrong. Thanks in advance. vikram... --

Re: Embebbing external interpreter in mutt

2002-06-26 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 06:37:32PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:12:45AM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote: > > > % menu. I don't think mutt currently supports that. > > > > > > In that case, what about something like > > > > > > msg-hook . 'set pager=builtin' > > > ms

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-26 Thread Nicolas Rachinsky
Please do NOT reply to random messages, create a new thread instead. * Vikram Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 23:29 +0530]: > I have defined a folder-hook as: > folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash" > > But the error coming is 'push too many arguments' try folder-hook !Trash "pus

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-26 Thread Gary Johnson
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:29:23PM +0530, Vikram Goyal wrote: > I have defined a folder-hook as: > folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash" > > But the error coming is 'push too many arguments' > > How can I resolve this. Please point me where I am wrong. That's because the folder hook se

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-26 Thread Cedric Duval
Vikram Goyal wrote: > I have defined a folder-hook as: > folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash" > But the error coming is 'push too many arguments' > How can I resolve this. Please point me where I am wrong. Try this: folder-hook !Trash 'push "unset maildir_trash"' PS: when coming wi

Re: Adressbook?

2002-06-26 Thread Jussi Ekholm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexander Skwar wrote.. >> Which adressbook tools do you use with mutt? > > I started using abook yesterday, so I can't really give a solid > evaluation yet. But so far so good. It's very easy to query

Re: Adressbook?

2002-06-26 Thread David T-G
Jussi -- ...and then Jussi Ekholm said... % % -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- % Hash: SHA1 % ... % One thing that annoys me a great deal is, that AFAIK you can't, for % example, forward/bounce emails with abook. At least I can't find % anything somehow related to it, but this: % % m

Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Robert Ian Smit
Hi, Don't know where to go to first with this problem, so y'all please be my victim ;) I run mutt in a gnome-terminal. I use LC_CTYPE=en_US, so defined in .bashrc. So far so good. I also have a shortcut aka launcher with a nice mutt icon that starts a gnome-terminal with a larger than default g

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread David T-G
Bob -- ...and then Robert Ian Smit said... % % Hi, Hello! % % Don't know where to go to first with this problem, so y'all please be my % victim ;) *griN* % ... % I also have a shortcut aka launcher with a nice mutt icon that % starts a gnome-terminal with a larger than default geometry a

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread David T-G
Bob -- ...and then David T-G said... % ... % Try putting mutt in a wrapper that sets your vars and is called by % your --command shortcut and see what it gets you. Note that I don't necessarily propose this as a permanent solution but instead a way to debug. What you need in the long run, esp

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Peter T. Abplanalp
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:18:54PM +0200, Robert Ian Smit wrote: > Hi, hello. > I don't know if the --command option for gnome-terminal causes a > different environment to be set. And if so if it's a feature or a > bug. After searching faqs, checking manuals and browsing bugzillas, > I give up.

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Gerhard Häring
* Robert Ian Smit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-26 21:18 +0200]: > Hi, > > Don't know where to go to first with this problem, so y'all please be my > victim ;) > > I run mutt in a gnome-terminal. I use LC_CTYPE=en_US, so defined in > .bashrc. So far so good. I'm pretty sure it has to do with log

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Vineet Kumar
* Peter T. Abplanalp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020626 12:29]: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:18:54PM +0200, Robert Ian Smit wrote: > > Hi, > > hello. > > > I don't know if the --command option for gnome-terminal causes a > > different environment to be set. And if so if it's a feature or a > > bug. Aft

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Robert Ian Smit
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:31:45PM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote: > I'm pretty sure it has to do with login-shell vs. interactive shell. I > wish I really understood that, but you could try setting LC_CTYPE in > ~/.bash_profile instead. I thought of that. I already changed .bash_profile to source

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Peter T. Abplanalp
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:18:54PM +0200, Robert Ian Smit wrote: > Hi, > > Don't know where to go to first with this problem, so y'all please be my > victim ;) > > I run mutt in a gnome-terminal. I use LC_CTYPE=en_US, so defined in > .bashrc. So far so good. > > I also have a shortcut aka launc

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Robert Ian Smit
First of all thanks to all the people for replying. I will respond to this message. > % I also have a shortcut aka launcher with a nice mutt icon that > % starts a gnome-terminal with a larger than default geometry and > % --command mutt. > > When you start that command how does your mutt get a

status_format

2002-06-26 Thread Sadiq Al-Lawatia
Hello Everyone, Is there a way of getting %f to just display the mailbox name rather than the full pathname of it? I have mailboxes nested in sub-directories and the name run off off the screen, so having just the mailbox name would really make it helpful. Thanx. -Sadiq

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Michael Mauch
Robert Ian Smit wrote: > I have also tried to put some different things behind --command, > like echo foo>foo.txt. This never works and even sometimes causes a > startup error. This cannot work. The redirection (">") is a shell feature, but --command does not start a shell, it only spawns the e

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 12:35 26 Jun 2002, Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | * Peter T. Abplanalp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020626 12:29]: | > > I don't know if the --command option for gnome-terminal causes a | > > different environment to be set. And if so if it's a feature or a | > > bug. After searching faqs, c

browsing folders

2002-06-26 Thread SB
My procmail puts incoming mail to different files(folders). Is there an easy way to view and browse these folders within mutt? Does mutt highlight the folders with new malis? --st.

browsing folders

2002-06-26 Thread SB
My procmailrc moves mails to different files(folders). Mutt opens spool mail when I start it. Is there an easy way to browse and view folders, the folders highlighted when there is new mail. (like pine, Outlook Express). --st.

Re: folder-hook push not responding as expected.

2002-06-26 Thread Michael Elkins
Vikram Goyal wrote: > folder-hook !Trash "push unset maildir_trash" Try this instead: folder-hook !Trash "push 'unset maildir_trash'"

Re: Mutt in Gnome Terminal

2002-06-26 Thread Jason Burnett
on Thu Jun 27 Cameron Simpson spoke forth with the blessed manuscript > On 12:35 26 Jun 2002, Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | * Peter T. Abplanalp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020626 12:29]: > | > > I don't know if the --command option for gnome-terminal causes a > | > > different environment