On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 12:10:14PM -0500, Dean Henrichsmeyer wrote:
> set folder=imap://host.foo.com/folder_root
>
> Substitute the host and the folder_root with your information and you'll
> browse your imap server by default.
>
> Dean
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 04:21:45PM +0200, Michal 'hram
Hi!
Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific
email to be send? I want:
pgp_create_traditionl=no
...
send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA
therefor set pgp_creat_traditional=yes
send it
...
now p_c_t=no again.
send-hook does not work because it does not rese
This is where I set from:
account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl
account-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
account-hook dec59 set imap_force_ssl=no imap_user=suchanek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get From: michal.suchanek@.
Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific
> email to be send? I want:
>
> pgp_create_traditionl=no
> ...
> send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA
> therefor set pgp_creat_traditional=yes
> send it
> ...
> now p_c
Hi!
I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd.
Why is that? How to fix?
Regards,
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www.almqvist.net/johan/qmail/
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd.
>
> Why is that? How to fix?
This is a good question. I have been wondering this myself. It has
only
Hi,
* Michael Tatge [04/11/02 11:10:25 CEST] wrote:
> Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific
> > email to be send? I want:
> >
> > pgp_create_traditionl=no
> > ...
> > send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-11-02 05:04]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd.
> >
> > Why is that? How to fix?
>
> This is
Michael Tatge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> Norbert Preining ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> > Is it possible to set a config variable only for one specific
> > email to be send? I want:
> >
> > pgp_create_traditionl=no
> > ...
> > send email to this and that person who uses stupid MUA
> > ther
Hello,
Please reply direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to get HTML mails to display with links.
I have this:
[ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap
text/html; /usr/bin/links %s
and these in .muttrc
set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
auto_view text/html
But I get this:
mailcap entry for type text/html n
Hello,
Please reply direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to get HTML mails to display with links.
I have this:
[ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap
text/html; /usr/bin/links %s
and these in .muttrc
set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
auto_view text/html
But I get this:
mailcap entry for type text/html n
11-Apr-02 at 12:01, Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Hello,
>
> Please reply direct to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists. Participation is expected, not
just one way communication.
> I am trying to get HTML mails to display with links.
>
> I have this:
>
>
Hello,
Thanks for the reply.
> Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists.
> Participation is expected, not
> just one way communication.
Actually, the custom is to reply to the person and CC to the list :-)
> I don't use auto_view or any settings in my muttrc and the mailcap works
> fine
I
* Ian Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-11-02 07:11]:
> Hello,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>
> > Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists.
> > Participation is expected, not
> > just one way communication.
>
> Actually, the custom is to reply to the person and CC to the list :-)
Actually, the
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:57:12AM +0200, Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek wrote:
> This is where I set from:
>
> account-hook . unset imap_user imap_force_ssl
> account-hook . set [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> account-hook artax set imap_force_ssl=yes imap_user=msuc8339 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> account-hook dec59 se
Hi all,
I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a
structure like that:
Mail/list/mutt-users
Mail/list/debian-users
Mail/mail/inbox
Mail/mail/private
...
(another idea I had was Mail/list/mutt-users/2002-04 but now I archive
my mails
Dominik --
...and then Dominik Mierzejewski said...
%
% On Wednesday, 10 April 2002, David T-G wrote:
% > % I would like to define a keystroke that fetches gpg keys for me from
% > % signed messages, like
% > %
% > % "gpg --keyserver www.keyserver.net --recv-keys 0x$KEY"
% > %
% > % But how ca
Michael --
...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said...
%
...
% Thank you for your responses. If I understand what you are writing, you
% all advise me to swich from browsing local folders by defalt to browsing
% remote folders by default.
At least when you want to look at remote folders, an
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 02:32:11PM +0200, Kai Weber wrote:
> But Mutt seems to have problems recognizing new mails in these folders
> if I specify mailboxes like that:
>
> mailboxes `find Mail -type f`
>
> What's wrong with that and how should i tune my settings?
could it be that you're s
Kai --
...and then Kai Weber said...
%
% Hi all,
Hello!
%
% I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a
% structure like that:
%
% Mail/list/mutt-users
% Mail/list/debian-users
% Mail/mail/inbox
% Mail/mail/private
% ...
Not bad.
%
% (a
Hi,
* Kai Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-11 14:32]:
>I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a
>structure like that:
>
> Mail/list/mutt-users
> Mail/list/debian-users
> Mail/mail/inbox
> Mail/mail/private
I have something similar:
Mail/in
M
At Thu, Apr 11 2002 [12:01 +0100], Ian Chilton aroused my curiosity with:
> text/html; /usr/bin/links %s
Try something like:
text/html; /usr/bin/links %s; copiousoutput
and read section 5.3 "MIME Viewer configuration with mailcap"
in the manual.
Tschoe,
Steff
Hello,
> Try something like:
> text/html; /usr/bin/links %s; copiousoutput
OK, thanks
Ian
* Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 14:52:24 +0200]:
> So far so good. Currently it is impossible to remove that pattern
> again. uncolor only works in the index.
> Devellopers, any chance to change that?
Once again I'd like to add my voice this feature. I see how you
people are...
* darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:19:58 -0400]:
> If you like pain, try stracing a mutt session:
> strace -o /tmp/mutt.out mutt
Actually, vim has very passable syntax highlighting for strace output
files...saved me a lot of headaches. Just name the file *.strace and
ope
Hi, all --
I recall some discussions of this but I don't think I've ever seen it
work. I'd like to limit to entire threads for any in which I've taken
part. I would think that for a given message one would either look for
that M-ID: (if it started a thread) or the references (if it were a reply
* Kai Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020411 14:32]:
> I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a
> structure like that:
> Mail/list/mutt-users
> Mail/list/debian-users
> Mail/mail/inbox
> Mail/mail/private
> ...
Have you tried
mailboxes `echo ~/Mai
> Michael --
>
> ...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said...
> %
> ...
> % Thank you for your responses. If I understand what you are writing, you
> % all advise me to swich from browsing local folders by defalt to browsing
> % remote folders by default.
>
> At least when you want to look a
* John Buttery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 09:27]:
> * darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 15:19:58 -0400]:
> > If you like pain, try stracing a mutt session:
> > strace -o /tmp/mutt.out mutt
>
> Actually, vim has very passable syntax highlighting for strace output
> files.
Michael --
...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said...
%
...
% > I would recommend a couple of macros which reset $folder so that you can
% > quickly change from local to remote and back.
%
% This is what I set up:
%
%
% set spoolfile="$HOME/Mail"
% set mbox_type=Maildir
% set
* Johan Almqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 09:44]:
> * Kai Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020411 14:32]:
> > I am just reorganzing my mail sorting and filtering. I now use a
> > structure like that:
> > Mail/list/mutt-users
> > Mail/list/debian-users
> > Mail/mail/inbox
> > Mail/
+ Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >What's wrong with that and how should i tune my settings?
> I use
> mailboxes `find ~/Mail -type f -print | grep -Ev '(admin|postponed|archiv)' |
>xargs`
Thank you all for your tips. Seems I forgot to set the mailboxes
relativly to $HOME. Now it seem
- Forwarded message from Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:25:59 +0200
From: Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mutt Users' list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: browsing Maildir folders - how?
Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users' list <[EMAIL
11-Apr-02 at 12:55, Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists.
> > Participation is expected, not
> > just one way communication.
>
> Actually, the custom is to reply to the person and CC to the list :-)
Not on this list, if I take precedents I have s
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 09:02:06AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Michael --
>
> ...and then Michal 'hramrach' Suchanek said...
> %
> ...
> %
> % set spoolfile="$HOME/Mail"
> % set mbox_type=Maildir
> % set record=$HOME/Mail/Sent
>
> This is interesting. The spoolfile setting looks lik
I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within
Outlook to do this. They give the following choices for converted format:
-Comma seperated values (DOS)
-Comma seperated values (Windows)
-dBase
I have a Maildir ~/Mail. I created an experimental directory
~~/Mail/artax to test forder name matching. If I browse folders and get
into this folder, selecting .. opens =artax/.. . Change folder
puts me into the same dir (~/Mail/artax) again, and again.
I set record=~/Mail/Sent. Now if I'm in the
11-Apr-02 at 10:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within
> Outlook to do this. They give the following choices for converted format:
>
> -Comma seperated values (DOS)
>
begin Patrick quotation:
>
> Actually, the custon is and SHOULD-BE: reply to list and ONLY CC to
> person if asked. We certainly do not want to receive posts twich
> without requesting such action.
IMHO, it should be "reply to list, and let the guy who refuses to join
the list use the archive
Hi,
I have set the following:
# don't reply to myself
set metoo=no
but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy.
Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply.
What is the wrong here?
Thanks.
Jun
Jun --
...and then Jun Sun said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I have set the following:
%
% # don't reply to myself
% set metoo=no
%
% but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy.
% Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply.
%
% What
John --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
%
% I've figured out how to convert Outlook mailboxes. There are filters within
No, you haven't :-)
...
%
% As tomorrow is my last day with access to Outlook and these files, there is a
% bit of urgency to this.
If you don't like any of the met
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:35:46AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> % but it seems when I use 'g' to reply to an email, I still get another copy.
> % Since I am already using "Fcc", so I ended up with two copies of my reply.
> %
> % What is the wrong here?
>
> mutt has to know who you are before it can
Hi,
* darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-04-11 16:03]:
>If the problem is the newlines, as someone suggested, give this a try:
>
> mailboxes `echo \`find ~/Mail -type f -print\``
>
>which gives me a full list with no newlines.
This can also be done with xargs(1), see my other mail in thi
Hi all.
I'm STILL trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i, but the process failed with the
following error:
--- 8< ---
pgp.c: In function `disable_coredumps':
pgp.c:70: variable `rl' has initializer but incomplete type
pgp.c:70: warning: excess elem
* Gary Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-10 10:22]:
[-- snip --]
> That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
> I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
> highlight the section headings like this:
>
> display-hook '~s "blips"' 'push "/\^[A-
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 12:52:45PM -0300, Eduardo Gargiulo wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm STILL trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i, but the process failed with the
> following error:
What's your environment? Operating system+version, compiler+version?
It appears that you're missing the resource limit decl
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> > That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
> > I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
> > highlight the section headings like this:
> >
> > display-hook '~s "blips"' 'push
If don't provide us with some basic information, I won't expect an
answer.
Eduardo Gargiulo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> I'm STILL trying to compile mutt-1.3.28i, but the process failed with the
> following error:
>
> --- 8< ---
> pgp.c:
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> Where does display-hook come from? I just built 1.3.28 and use
> 1.3.22.1 regularly and neither has it. I'm assuming it comes from a
> patch, but which one?
It was a patch for the 1.2 series. I'm using patch-1.2.bj.display-
Quoting David T-G (Wed Apr 10 14:10:19 CEST 2002)
> Are you using the stock mutt that you've had all along, or did you
> just breed a new mutt? In the latter case, whether you chose to use
> mutt_dotlock or have mutt do the locking itself, does the proper binary
> have the permissions to do so?
Quoting Rafael C. Gawenda, Wed Apr 10 10:25:37 +0200 2002 (CEST)
> Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if
> it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost.
FYI:
It was (of course) my fault, and it was a simple config mistake...
Many thanks to all who have
At 8:33 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off:
> No problem. This used to work for me before I started playing with
> folder-hooks, and it still works even though it doesn't put the key into
> the target ring as I'd like (I have lots of keyrings).
I'm just curious...what advantage is there to s
Well, in my best low tech manner, I think I've come up with something of promise.
What I did was:
1) Select all the messages in the inbox or outbox.
2) Perform File|Save As and save the entire contents as a text file.
These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have to f
begin [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotation:
>
> These big text files open fine with vim. When I get home, I may have to fiddle with
>the From header to get things right. But, this may work.
That'll be easy. One line of Perl or shell, most likely.
--
Shawn McMahon| Information m
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 12:24]:
> Well, in my best low tech manner, I think I've come up with something
> of promise. What I did was:
>
> 1) Select all the messages in the inbox or outbox. 2) Perform
> File|Save As and save the entire contents as a text file.
>
>
Rafael --
...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said...
%
% Quoting David T-G (Wed Apr 10 14:10:19 CEST 2002)
%
% > Are you using the stock mutt that you've had all along, or did you
% > just breed a new mutt? In the latter case, whether you chose to use
% > mutt_dotlock or have mutt do the locking it
At 9:29 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off:
> I recall some discussions of this but I don't think I've ever seen it
> work. I'd like to limit to entire threads for any in which I've taken
> part.
For many people that would be tricky but fortunately for you it's just "l."
;->
For lurkers it
Rafael --
...and then Rafael C. Gawenda said...
%
% Quoting Rafael C. Gawenda, Wed Apr 10 10:25:37 +0200 2002 (CEST)
%
% > Of course, I've the src package and patches handy, it's not lazyness, but if
% > it is the config, then is where I'm a little lost.
%
% FYI:
% It was (of course) my fault,
Rob, et al --
...and then Rob Reid said...
%
% At 8:33 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off:
% > No problem. This used to work for me before I started playing with
% > folder-hooks, and it still works even though it doesn't put the key into
% > the target ring as I'd like (I have lots of keyr
Rob --
...and then Rob Reid said...
%
% At 9:29 AM EDT on April 11 David T-G sent off:
% > I recall some discussions of this but I don't think I've ever seen it
% > work. I'd like to limit to entire threads for any in which I've taken
% > part.
%
% For many people that would be tricky but for
* Am Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:39:47AM -0500 , schrieb David T-G:
> % Is anybody interested in reading it ? (154 lines)
>
> Sure.
>
>
So here it comes: (my procmailrc)
LOGFILE=/home/chris/.procmail.log
LOGABSTRACT="all"
VERBOSE="yes"
#Backup
:0 c
Mail/backup
:0 ic
| cd backup && rm -
I recently upgrade from 1.2.5i to 1.3.28i (thanks mutt-users).
Now, when i try to sign a message, i get the following error
gpg: can't mmap pool of 16384 bytes: Invalid argument - using malloc
i see the same message in the verified and not verified signatures. I
was using gnupg 1.0.6 with previo
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% I recently upgrade from 1.2.5i to 1.3.28i (thanks mutt-users).
% Now, when i try to sign a message, i get the following error
%
% gpg: can't mmap pool of 16384 bytes: Invalid argument - using malloc
Hmmm...
%
% i see the same message in th
On Thu 11-Apr-2002 at 11:51:36AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
>
> The specific case is my mutt-users folder. When I reply to a message
> I keep the original, and then of course get my reply. Once the thread
> dies I still have the original and my reply, but by now it's two pages
> back in the index.
* On 2002.04.11, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Simon White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 11-Apr-02 at 12:55, Ian Chilton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > > Sorry, no. Mailing lists are mailing lists.
> > > Participation is expected, not
> > > just one way communication.
> >
> > Actually, the cu
* Dan Boger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 12:02]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 11:54:49AM -0400, darren chamberlain wrote:
> > > That being said, I would really like such an uncolor feature myself.
> > > I receive internal newsletters that I find easier to read if I
> > > highlight the section head
Bruno --
...and then Bruno Postle said...
%
% On Thu 11-Apr-2002 at 11:51:36AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% >
% > I keep the original, and then of course get my reply. Once the thread
...
% > nothing else of value in the thread, then I want to delete it -- but
% > to do that I have to be able to
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get automatically Fcc'd.
> >
> > Why is that? How to fix?
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "resend" a message
> > > to someone (with edited contents) it doesn't get a
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 14:12:05 -0400]:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > > > I have a problem that I don't like. When I use Esc-e to "re
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 14:12:05 -0400]:
> > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Nicolas Rachinsky wrote:
> > > * Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-11 05:59:50 -0400]:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 11, 2002, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > > > > I
On Apr 11, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IIRC mutt just sets the Fcc as for any "normal" mail.
>
> So what was fixed in 1.3.28?
Resend-message now honors $record and fcc-hooks.
Holger
+ Dan Sully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > mailboxes `find Mail -type f`
>
> If you are using procmail - this script might be useful.
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl -w
> [...]
Nice idea and sure helps a lot. But in my .procmailrc nearly no folder
name is used. Most of the stuff is done by $MATCH.
But a sc
Hi,
post has finally reached version 2.0. Don't let the .0 scare you, it hasn't
been rewritten from scratch or anything like that.
If you haven't used it before, it is an emacs mode that has a lot of features,
both useful and fanciful, for composing email and news messages with external
user ag
> > I have this:
> >
> > [ian@buzz:~]$ cat .mailcap
> > text/html; /usr/bin/links %s
> >
> > and these in .muttrc
> > set mailcap_path="~/.mailcap"
> > auto_view text/html
>
> For lynx I have:-
>
> text/html; lynx -force_html %s; needsterminal;
>
> I don't use auto_view or any settings in m
On Apr 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> ...and then Bruno Postle said...
> % Go to the first message and press ttt etc.. until you've
> % tagged all the threads. Then limit to show all tagged messages:
>
> Aha! I didn't realize that tagging would go beyond limits. It's manual,
> but
Jeremy, et al --
...and then Jeremy Blosser said...
%
% On Apr 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
% >
% > Aha! I didn't realize that tagging would go beyond limits. It's manual,
% > but it will work.
%
% Tagging won't necessarily go beyond limits, it's <*-thread> commands that
A..
Kai --
...and then Kai Weber said...
%
% + Dan Sully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
%
% > > mailboxes `find Mail -type f`
% >
% > If you are using procmail - this script might be useful.
% >
% > #!/usr/bin/perl -w
% > [...]
%
% Nice idea and sure helps a lot. But in my .procmailrc nearly no folder
%
Chad --
First, I should note that the proper address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rather than @gbnet. While mutt.org is hosted at gbnet and the address
sometimes slips out, many here will only properly notice the message if
it goes to the real address.
...and then skidley said...
%
...
% With lynx -fo
> Try formail; I think it can add missing From lines.
>
> (darren)
>
The Outlook file is formatted with the first line as, for example:
From: John Q. Hacker
If I execute formail -ds >new_mailbox, as per man formail,
the new_mailbox has a first line of:
>From John
but stops there, not proc
81 matches
Mail list logo
