»Sven Guckes« sagte am 2002-03-21 um 00:45:34 +0100 :
> who said that the "compressed folders patch"
> will work when using Maildir format? ;-)
Nobody, that's why I'd like to force mbox_type=mbox when saving to a
.bz2 file.
> append-hook? is this a new one?
Yes. Introduced by CFP.
Alexander
Flavien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> As the subject says, I recently switched from Netscape to mutt,
> a couple of weeks ago. I wanted to do it for a long time, for
> several reasons, but you know how lazy one can be when it comes
> to changing ones habits... :o)
Same for me. I have used Netscape
* Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 19:10:40 -0500]:
> At 5:18 PM EST on March 21 Mike Schiraldi sent off:
> > I don't know. It would be nice to press the key bound to and type,
> > like,
> > perl -pe 's/<.*?>//g'
> > to remove all HTML tags from a message.
>
> It's practically a necess
* Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
> Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
>
> source "shell-cmd |"
>
> Wouldn't:
>
> macro foo :source "shell-cmd|"
>
> be general enough to go most algorithmic things without bloating
> mutt? The she
* Flavien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 01:10:52 +0100]:
> *) I filter my fetchmailed-mails through procmail and send the
> mails to the appropriate folders (especially mailing lists). Mutt
> does not show "N" in front of the dirs. I read on this list
> that's because mutt compares the last-acce
Pankaj Jangid ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered:
> set from = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
>
> is not working
It should (since you are using 1.3.27). I guess you forgot to set
$envelope_from?
# Configure From:
set realname="Michael Tatge"
set from="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
set use_from#
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% > %
% > % define ''
...
% > (pager, index, compose, ...) to set the scope of the command, how are the
% > two at all diff
Cameron, et al --
...and then Cameron Simpson said...
%
% On 11:44 21 Mar 2002, Steve Talley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
% | David T-G wrote:
% | > ...and then Steve Talley said...
...
% | > > orignal, why shouldn't it be able to do the same with an arbitrary
% | > > shell script?
% | >
% | > It
Quoting Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 22, 2002 06:20]:
> * Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
> > Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
> >
> > source "shell-cmd |"
> >
> > Wouldn't:
> >
> > macro foo :source "shell-cmd|"
> >
>
Quoting Mike Schiraldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 21, 2002 17:17]:
> #! /usr/bin/perl -W
> while(<>) { print; s/\r//g; chomp; last unless $_; }
> while(<>) { y/A-Za-z/N-ZA-Mn-za-m/; print; }
while (<>) {
(1 .. /^$/) ? s/\r\n//g : y/A-Za-z/N-ZA-Mn-za-m/;
print;
}
:)
(darren)
--
A
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 16:49]:
>
> > [SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
>
> [SNIP Sven swears in public]
>
> Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:10:52AM +0100, Flavien wrote:
> *) Aliases : Do I really have to press ^T and then select each
> recipient one at a time when I send an email ? I would like
> to select multiple persons.
By default, ^T initiate an external address query while alias searching
is initiat
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
>
> > * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 16:49]:
> >
> > > [SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
> >
> > [SNIP Sven swears in public]
> >
> > Sven [slang, anyone?]
>
> I seem
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > programmable via slang.
>
> possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could
> be developed rather than an accomplished fact.
speaking of which (sin
Flavien --
...and then Flavien said...
%
% Hi,
Hello and welcome!
%
...
% *) I filter my fetchmailed-mails through procmail and send the
% mails to the appropriate folders (especially mailing lists). Mutt
% does not show "N" in front of the dirs. I read on this list
% that's because mutt com
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > programmable via slang.
>
> possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could be
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 01:08:04PM +0200, Mike Jackson scratched:
> Flavien ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Other than that, I'm _so happy_ that I can read my mail archives
> > from work/home, that I can even use email without X, and that
> > it starts faster than my previous mailer ... Thanks to m
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> >
> > > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > > programmable via slang.
> >
> > possibly - but I'v
* On 2002.03.21, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
* "Jerry Van Brimmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, I am using sendmail, but I have no clue as to where sendmail's log file is.
> Do you know?
Sendmail doesn't keep an independent log file. All its logs are routed
through the syslog service, so t
At 8:42 PM EST on March 21 Gary Johnson sent off:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:58:16PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
> > I've tried w3m and stripmime does just as well. In fact, I don't want any
> > fancy interpretation of HTML mail by default - it slows things down and can
> > be dangerous if the HTML
At 6:10 AM EST on March 22 Nicolas Rachinsky sent off:
> * Rob Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 19:10:40 -0500]:
> > macro index "H" "|/home/reid/bin/stripmime.pl >> /var/spool/mail/reid"
>
> What happens if some mail is delivered to your inbox while you are
> executing this macro? I think y
What's the equivalent of send-hook when using the NNTP patch? Is there a
followup-hook?
I'd like to add a header for only news postings.
--
Drew
Drew --
...and then Drew Raines said...
%
% What's the equivalent of send-hook when using the NNTP patch? Is there a
% followup-hook?
I don't think that there is any such beast.
%
% I'd like to add a header for only news postings.
This came up just recently. I think Sven Guckes, at least,
+ David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> An approach that I recall as successful was to set up a send-hook that
> only triggered when there is no to: field and set the header in there,
> turning it off (or changing it) otherwise if to: can match anything.
I believe the suggestion was something to the
Rob --
...and then Rob Reid said...
%
% At 6:10 AM EST on March 22 Nicolas Rachinsky sent off:
% >
% > What happens if some mail is delivered to your inbox while you are
% > executing this macro? I think your mailbox will get corrupt.
%
% I'm not completely sure what happens, but my mail come
Drew --
...and then Drew Raines said...
%
% + David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
% >
% > An approach that I recall as successful was to set up a send-hook that
% > only triggered when there is no to: field and set the header in there,
% > turning it off (or changing it) otherwise if to: can match an
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 12:40:40PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
> At 8:42 PM EST on March 21 Gary Johnson sent off:
> > > And then if the message had a good reason to use HTML, I'd have to dig up
> > > how to *not* auto_view it, in order to send it to a real browser. That's
> > > why I stopped using
At 16:00 + 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a pretty clear memory of someone producing and maintain a patch
> which enabled slang as a scripting language for mutt. I know it was
> mentioned a good few times, either here or on the developers' mailing list.
>
> Am
* Steve Talley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 18:45]:
> Suppose my default $editor is something ridiculously long, like:
> vi -o2 -e -b '+/^subject' '+s/^subject/SuBJeCt/i' '+/^$/'
then you certainly have a problem with your editor's setup. ;-)
you can put all these commands into a file and
* Andre Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-18 15:51]:
> > Can't you BCC all messages to one address, and filter with procmail?
> that's what I'm doing :) The problem is, when I
> post news (nntp-patch), I don't want a Bcc header.
well, does this BCC header get posted, too?
if not then I don't a
30 matches
Mail list logo
