On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Doug Kearns wrote:
> You could replace the awk invocation with +'/^$/+1'
Thanks for the information. May I ask you another question regarding awk,
please? My wife is a linguist and she would for some of her research
retrograde sort (i.e., sorting by words taken from the othe
Hi,
Could you tell me how to make the "To: " address set to the mailing
list addres when I try to make a reply to a mailing list?
I always see the writer's address in the "To: " when I make a reply.
Thanks,
--
YOON, Joo-Yung / ArBaGo Int'l
KOREA 420-111 BooChun WonMi-1-Dong 1-28 (GunYong Bldg.
YOON, Joo-Yung wrote:
>
> Could you tell me how to make the "To: " address set to the mailing
> list addres when I try to make a reply to a mailing list?
>
> I always see the writer's address in the "To: " when I make a reply.
subscribe to the list (man muttrc) in your .muttrc and then use 'L'
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 01:07:12PM +0900, YOON, Joo-Yung (dis)graced my inbox with:
> Could you tell me how to make the "To: " address set to the mailing
> list addres when I try to make a reply to a mailing list?
Go into your .muttrc and configure your mailing lists with the subscribe
command. R
Hello, list. I've a problem sending emails like this one:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Juan Alonso Hernández" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Bcc:
Subject: Test
Reply-To:
Test msg
hehehe,
thanks
aloha,
dave
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:38:15PM +1100, Doug Kearns wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 07:42:30PM -0500, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Doug Kearns wrote:
> >
> > > You could replace the awk invocation with +'/^$/+1'
> >
> > Thanks for the information. M
Hi,
I would like to apply different "From: " address for every mailing lists.
For example,
Message to A mailing list has "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Message to B mailing list has "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can I do that by
send-hook A "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
send-hook B "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
set
Hello.
I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
best Regards
--
Kr00lik
Is it the fact that the U.S. government doesn't respect human rights that
makes you so upset? If so, I'm all behind you.
Jesper
* On Tue Oct 30, Dave Price wrote:
> I find your X-echelon header to be in INCREDIBLY poor taste!!! Change
> you settings or post somewhere else.
>
> aloha,
> dave
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
> How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
you can't.
w
--
GPG Public Key:
http://infinitejazz.net/will/pgp/
Hi,
I would like to apply different "From: " address for every mailing lists.
For example,
Message to A mailing list has "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Message to B mailing list has "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Can I do that by
send-hook A "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
send-hook B "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
se
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:41:29AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello.
> I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
> How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
>
I think you have to ask the manager of the external MTA to
allow your host to get relayed.
> best Regar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Can I do that by
> send-hook A "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> send-hook B "set [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Use "myhdr" instead, $from does not work unfortunately.
send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:'
send-hook . 'my_hdr From: Doughnut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
send-hook '~L mut
Will Yardley [31/10/01 04:43 -0800]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I have a problem with sending mails through external MTA.
> > How can i set up mutt to send through another host?
>
> you can't.
The best way is to either
[1] Set up your local MTA to smarthost through another host (see
htt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [31/10/01 21:43 +0900]:
> I would like to apply different "From: " address for every mailing lists.
> For example,
> Message to A mailing list has "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Message to B mailing list has "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Can I do that by
> send-hook A "set [EMAIL P
Jesper Holmberg [31/10/01 13:44 +0100]:
> Is it the fact that the U.S. government doesn't respect human rights that
> makes you so upset? If so, I'm all behind you.
It is the fact that this X-Echelon header game has become rather childish
that makes the guy so upset, I guess.
> * On Tue Oct 30,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 08:31:02PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Jesper Holmberg [31/10/01 13:44 +0100]:
> > Is it the fact that the U.S. government doesn't respect human rights that
> > makes you so upset? If so, I'm all behind you.
>
> It is the fact that this X-Echelon header game ha
Cliff Sarginson [31/10/01 16:41 +0100]:
> Am I missing out on something here ?
> What is the X-Echelon header when it is at home ?
Echelon is supposedly the CIA's s00p3r s3kr17 new gadget to snoop on people's
email. So, lots of 31337 d00dz here like to put in X-Echelon headers with
echelon bait
Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 10/30/2001:
> Now, what I'm trying to do is:
>
> I have a IN.perso folder where all my private e-mails arrive
> (thru procmail). This folder has a mbox defined in muttrc:
>
> mbox-hook IN.perso ~/Mail/perso
>
> I can eas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:41:50PM +0100,
Cliff Sarginson formed electrons and emmitted this:
[*]Am I missing out on something here ?
[*]What is the X-Echelon header when it is at home ?
[*]Will my teenage son think his dad is a cool dude
[
Hi,
I want to run two Mutts in parallel.
1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes or just the one I name in the
command line? Is there another way to do it?
tia,
Thorsten
--
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety
Thus spake Peter L. Berghold ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So, what I am saying is the whole idea of an X-Echelon header is a
> game that was funny the first 99 times it was done and like many over
> told jokes has gotten pretty lame. Don't waste time on it.
For that matter, don't waste time on _anyone
On 2001-10-31 Thorsten Haude wrote:
> I want to run two Mutts in parallel.
> 1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
No, I often do that.
> 2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes or just the one I name in the
> command line? Is there another way to do it?
>
Only the named ones.
But
On Wed 31-Oct-2001 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
>
> Putting an X-Echelon header in your email with provocative words in it
> supposedly causes the NSA computers to waste cycles processing them.
If you just want to waste cycles on other peoples computers, try this:
:m
* Bruno Postle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-10-2001 17:50]:
| On Wed 31-Oct-2001 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
| >
| > Putting an X-Echelon header in your email with provocative words in it
| > supposedly causes the NSA computers to waste cycles processing them.
|
| If you just want
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 09:18:41AM -, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > You could replace the awk invocation with +'/^$/+1'
> Thanks for the information. May I ask you another question regarding awk,
> please?
And so I did -- but unfortunately to the list. Sorry for that.
Matej
--
Matej Cepl, [EMAIL P
Moin,
so trifft man sich wieder.
* Christoph Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-10-31 17:43]:
>On 2001-10-31 Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> 1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
>No, I often do that.
Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
>> 2. Does '-R' read-only all mailboxes o
Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
--
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 31 11:18:42 2001
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (htt
* Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-10-2001 18:13]:
| Here's another. All the other PGP-signed emails in the thead parsed
| fine. Just this one was like this, every time.
This one was not pgp/mime signed, but traditional. Did you press
P when this happened?
| >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed O
Thorsten Haude wrote:
>
> >> 1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
> >No, I often do that.
> Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
I'm not Christoph, but I often use several mutt's at the same time, too.
I even modify mails in both of the mut's, and I never got problems.
Folks,
could you please stop this entirely off-topic, silly, and
unnecessary discussion?
If someone finds an X-Echelon header cool, that's his business.
If someone else finds that particular one tasteless, he's of course
free to complain about it IN PRIVATE MAIL, or in alt.flame.
But, please
* Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hey guys, I've been having this terrible problem with email spam and I
> was wondering if you guys have similar problems, and if so, what you do
> about them.
I vote for taking the spammer out and having him/her/them drawn and
quartered.
> Anyway,
Hi,
* Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-10-31 18:18]:
>Thorsten Haude wrote:
>> >> 1. Is there any problem except writing mailboxes?
>> Do you have any special provisions in this respect?
>I'm not Christoph, but I often use several mutt's at the same time, too.
>I even modify mails in both of
Thorsten Haude wrote:
> I can see me appending mail, eg. when I send one; but I usually don't
> modify the mails in my mboxes. What do I miss here?
Argh... ok, this was confusing. What I really meant was, you can get
into trouble, when you append two mails to one mailbox *at the same
time*. But
please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
what must i do for mutt ot work here also
TIA JJK
_
/| John J Kearney |\
| Wireless(B
* John J Kearney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) babbled:
> please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
here's what i use.
## =
## Color definitions
## =
color attachment white magenta
color body cyan default "ftp://[^ ]*"
color body brightgree
Hi,
* Volker Moell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-10-31 18:50]:
>Argh... ok, this was confusing. What I really meant was, you can get
>into trouble, when you append two mails to one mailbox *at the same
>time*. But this is very implausible. Normal operations like delete
>and add mails are harmless (i
When I was first messing around with Mutt I had similar
troubles when trying to use a regular old xterm. It
seems like I found that setting the environment variable
TERM to color_xterm instead of just xterm made it work.
Calling xterm with the -tn color_xterm flag has a similar
effect, I think.
H
* John J Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-10-2001 19:01]:
| please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
|
| i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
|
| what must i do for mutt ot work here also
Configure them in your .muttrc ;)
See the 'color' section in `man muttrc`.
--
Re
Moin,
* John J Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-10-31 19:02]:
>please can sombody tell me how to enable colors in mutt
>
>i have a color xterm and vim has colors in it
>
>what must i do for mutt ot work here also
Do you have color statements in your ~/.muttrc?
Go to www.mutt.org and look for exam
Thorsten Haude wrote:
>
> You do that without excessive 's?
Of course *with*. I often forget that somewhere else on another screen
another mutt is open... ;-)
> OK then, I'm game.
Good luck! :-)
-volker
--
http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/
Fachbeg
The problem is fixed in the CVS, and in 1.3.23.1.
(The latter one is an intermediate development version with new
threading code. Use with care.)
On 2001-10-31 12:11:15 -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:11:15 -0500
>From: Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: mutt <[EMAIL P
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:43:33AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote:
> Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said something to this effect on 10/31/2001:
> > Thanks for answering me !
>
> Oh, sure. I've got nothing better to do (but don't tell my
> boss I said that.) ;)
>
> > On Wed, Oct 31, 2
Hi,
I have set up Unicode support on my console (RedHat 7.0) with the
following in /etc/sysconfig/i18n:
LANG="cs_CZ"
SYSFONT="lat2-16"
SYSFONTACM="iso02+euro"
UNIMAP="iso02"
Everything seems to work well, except for mutt (and mc, but
that's another question). When I set charset to utf-8, it doe
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Daniel Farnsworth Teichert wrote:
> When I was first messing around with Mutt I had similar
> troubles when trying to use a regular old xterm. It
> seems like I found that setting the environment variable
> TERM to color_xterm instead of just xterm made it work.
> Calling xte
Ben,
I had the same problem ... prepending classic to the links seems to get
you what you want (somewhere in the archives, since that's where i
learned about it). this works for openers:
http://bb.classic.themes.org/php/docs.phtml?docid=25&secid=6.2&do=Up
hth (and aloha),
dave
On Wed, Oct 31
Thorsten --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
% Hi,
Hello! I know that this has been answered back and forth a bit, but it
looks to me like things might still be a bit unclear...
%
% I want to run two Mutts in parallel.
Not a problem. I, too, do it frequently; one common reason I do is
to
Dave --
...and then Dave Price said...
%
...
% http://bb.classic.themes.org/php/docs.phtml?docid=25&secid=6.2&do=Up
Did you really mean to send this to us? :-)
%
% hth (and aloha),
% dave
:-D
--
David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles
(play) [EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 06:36:45PM +0100, Eric Van Buggenhaut (dis)graced my inbox
with:
> The fact that you can have a mbox-hook linked to a macro isn't documented here. I
>only have:
>
>mbox-hook [!]pattern mailbox
> When mutt changes to a mail folder which matches patte
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-Oct-01 03:44 -0800]:
[...]
>> > pine
>> > mutt
>> > netscape
>> > kmail
>> >
>> > should be sorted in this set:
>> >
>> > pine
>> > netscape
>> > kmail
>> > mutt
[...]
>> rev filename | sort | rev
[...]
am i missing something
Denis --
...and then Denis Perelyubskiy said...
% * Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-Oct-01 03:44 -0800]:
% [...]
% >> >
% >> > should be sorted in this set:
% >> >
% >> > pine
% >> > netscape
% >> > kmail
% >> > mutt
% [...]
% >> rev filename | sort | rev
% [...]
%
%
- Forwarded message from davep -
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 19:17:06 -0700
To: Denis Perelyubskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT: not able to set textwidth to 65
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed,
Oct 31, 2001 at 06:02:23PM -0800
Ac
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 09:16:46PM -0500, David T-G
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But that would put mutt before kmail, which isn't what he wanted :-)
And it would also put irrelevant before mutt, which is why maybe it's
time to take this off-list for anyone who still cares.
-Daniel
--
Daniel
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 11:01:00AM -0500, Peter L. Berghold wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:41:50PM +0100,
> Cliff Sarginson formed electrons and emmitted this:
> [*]Am I missing out on something here ?
> [*]What is the X-Echelon hea
54 matches
Mail list logo
