Is this possible to implement without pathcing the source?
I mean, Instead of having to explicitly calling it with '$'
Whatever I do in mutt I would like my mailbox flags to be updated in
real time.
Thanx
--
Eric Smith
Hi Eric,
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/13/01 12:03]:
> Is this possible to implement without pathcing the source?
>
> I mean, Instead of having to explicitly calling it with '$'
You just have to define some macros. For instance :
macro index d "" "delete and sync"
macro pager d "" "delet
Suresh Ramasubramanian spake thus: (Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 07:51:11AM +0530)
> Nate Johnston [mutt-users] <10/08/01 14:51 -0500>:
> > I am running mutt, but I do not want to submit my mail to the running
> > Sendmail daemon for reliability reasons. I am looking for a utility
>
> Erm, how (un)rel
> My issue is not with sendmail, per se, but with a new set of policies
> that have been implemented locally. Redirecting all mail from the Unix
> host to a Windows NT machine to be virus and "content" screened is a
> decision I disagree with. And seeing as that screening server has
> already
Nate Johnston [mutt-users] <13/08/01 07:28 -0500>:
> This is a multi-user system and I do not have superuser priveliges. My
> impression is that compiling and installing a home-directory local copy
> of sendmail is an exercise best avoided if possible.
Then you are better off with Masqmail /
Hi Andrei!
On Thu, 09 Aug 2001, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
> I have a few save-hooks set up to save my mailing list stuff into
> different folders. However, I'd like to set up a default save-hook that
> would save anything that is not caught by the other save-hooks into
> another directory according
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> have you tried:
> save-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' =people/foo
> save-hook '~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]' =people/jester
Hi,
Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any emai
I added "set envelope_from" in your .muttrc and it works perfectly. Even
before messing with sendmail?! I don't even know where I added my smtp
server!? How can this be?
Looks like this is my last question regarding this topic, thanks for all
your help!
-Noesis
According to Cedric Duval on Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 01:03:48PM +0200:
| Hi Eric,
|
| * Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/13/01 12:03]:
| > Is this possible to implement without pathcing the source?
| >
| > I mean, Instead of having to explicitly calling it with '$'
|
| You just have to define som
Quoting Andrei Zmievski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
> suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any email address
> that's not already caught by other save-hooks.
Did you look at "save_name"? I think i
Noesis [mutt-users] <13/08/01 08:37 -0500>:
> I added "set envelope_from" in your .muttrc and it works perfectly. Even
> before messing with sendmail?! I don't even know where I added my smtp
> server!? How can this be?
Mutt uses your local sendmail.
> Looks like this is my last question r
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Sam Roberts wrote:
> > Of course I can do that for each individual email address, but it would
> > suck. I need to know if there's a way to do it for any email address
> > that's not already caught by other save-hooks.
>
> Did you look at "save_name"? I think it also interact
* Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/13/01 16:25]:
> | You just have to define some macros. For instance :
> |
> | macro index d "" "delete and sync"
> | macro pager d "" "delete and sync"
> |
>
> Of course !
>
> But slight problem, the sync-mailbox command does not work on my Mutt
> 1.2.5i in t
On 010813, at 09:47:00, Andrei Zmievski wrote
> [...] Right now if I have email from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
> and the default location is "=joeman". What I want it to be is
> "=people/joeman"..
Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:24:25AM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
: On 010813, at 09:47:00, Andrei Zmievski wrote
: >
: > [...] Right now if I have email from
: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
: > and the default location is "=joeman". What I want it to
Eugene --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
% On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:24:25AM -0700, David Ellement wrote:
% : On 010813, at 09:47:00, Andrei Zmievski wrote
% : >
% : > [...] Right now if I have email from
% : > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
% : > and
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, David Ellement wrote:
> > [...] Right now if I have email from
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and I hit 'save', it prompts me for where to save it to
> > and the default location is "=joeman". What I want it to be is
> > "=people/joeman"..
>
> Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'sav
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:41:48AM -0400, David T-G wrote:
: ...and then Eugene Lee said...
: %
: % Is '%u' documented in the Mutt 1.2.5 docs as a valid save-hook sequence?
:
: Now that you know what it is and searching is trivial, you should look
: it up for yourself and see.
:
: It is. Well,
On 010813, at 10:50:53, Andrei Zmievski wrote
> > Perhaps 'save-hook . =people/%u' or 'save-hook !~l =people/%u' will
> > do what you want.
>
> It works but it disables all other save-hooks I have. For example:
>
> save-hook . =people/%u
> save-hook ~Lphp-dev +OpenSource/PHP
Since m
On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, David Ellement wrote:
> Since mutt uses the first matching save-hook, a default save-hook
> needs to be appear last.
Woohoo, it works! Thank you.
-Andrei
"The galaxy is, in other words, an immensely, intrinsically,
and inexhaustibly interesting place." -- Iain M. Banks
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 06:42:18PM -0400, Kyle Knack wrote:
> Has anyone gotten muttzilla and/or altmail to work with the latest
> releases of Mozilla (ie: 0.92) ? It seems as though the prefs.js (I
> can't remember the exact name) is generated dynamically or by some
> similar action. I could al
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 13:12:26 -0400, Michael Sanders wrote:
> I have version 0.40 (the most recent listed at
> http://www3.telus.net/brian_winters/mutt/ )
> working without problems. What is v 0.92?
But does this work with Mozilla (the current version is now 0.9.3)?
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[EMAI
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 08:02:25PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
>
> But does this work with Mozilla (the current version is now 0.9.3)?
>
Mea culpa!
I just tried with Mozilla 0.9.3 (Navigator only). The prefs.js file is
fine, but muttzilla does not open for me either.
Has anyone tried netsca
* Nate Johnston ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010813 05:34]:
> Suresh Ramasubramanian spake thus: (Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 07:51:11AM +0530)
>
> > Nate Johnston [mutt-users] <10/08/01 14:51 -0500>:
> > > I am running mutt, but I do not want to submit my mail to the running
> > > Sendmail daemon for reliabil
I use fcc-save-hooks like:
fcc-save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] =".Clients.CompanyX.People.joe bob"
I'd like to limit matches to the To: and From: fields, skipping the Cc:
and Bcc: fields. I figure the following would probably work, but is there
a more elegant (i.e. less redundant) method?
fcc-save-
On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 07:29:00PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Horacio [mutt-users] <12/08/01 06:08 +0200>:
> > Sorry, my mistake. This is what happens when you go back to using
> > sendmail after time using qmail and forget to change the line in
> > .fetchmailrc:
> > mda /usr/loc
On 010813, at 16:00:36, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote
> I'd like to limit matches to the To: and From: fields, skipping the Cc:
> and Bcc: fields. I figure the following would probably work, but is there
> a more elegant (i.e. less redundant) method?
>
> fcc-save-hook ~t [EMAIL PROTECTED] | ~f [E
Hi all..
ich have a small problem (I think) with mutt and gpg.
I'v got mutt-1.3.19 with gnupg-1.0.6 and all went fine, but when I want to
encrypt a mail, I got this:
usage: gpg [options] --encrypt [filename]
I seems something wrong, but i do not find this error.
In my .muttrc I have this vor g
Hi all..
ich have a small problem (I think) with mutt and gpg.
I'v got mutt-1.3.19 with gnupg-1.0.6 and all went fine, but when I want to
encrypt a mail, I got this:
usage: gpg [options] --encrypt [filename]
I seems something wrong, but i do not find this error.
In my .muttrc I have this vor g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mutt-users] <13/08/01 23:14 +0200>:
> BTW, my rc.conf for the sendmail daemon reads (this is a BSD
> system):
> sendmail_flags="-bd -q30m"
> I recall reading somewhere that passing the -bd flag to sendmail and
This runs sendmail in daemon mode
> then passing the -d flag to fo
On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 11:43:53PM +0200, Jan-Hendrik Palic wrote:
>
> In my .muttrc I have this vor gpg- encryptions:
>
> set pgp_encrypt_only_command="gpg -v --batch --output - --encrypt --textmode
> --armor --always-trust -- -r %r -- %f"
>
> set pgp_encrypt_sign_command="gpg --passphrase-fd
31 matches
Mail list logo
