Hi Cedric,
* Cedric Duval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010727 01:09]:
> * Thomas Huemmler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/27/01 00:23]:
> > I´ve got a problem with "my_hdr From:" and "fcc-hook". If "my_hdr From:"
> > is set, Mutt doesn´t produce a Fcc-Line. Is this a bug?
>
> Looks like no fcc-hook is matching
I don't know how to make mutt distinguish between pdf and word (doc)
documents. They both show up as octet stream. So, I am trying to put a test
command into my mailcap file to test which type of file is attached, doc or
pdf. I am not having much luck, so I think I need some help.
Here is my mail
How can I make a simple command for moving messages between folders? I
don't see how it could be done with a macro that first copies and then
deletes, since needs an argument from the user (the
destination folder).
--
Kalle Hasselström, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP signature
Am Fre, 27 Jul 2001, schrieb Kalle Hasselström:
> How can I make a simple command for moving messages between folders? I
> don't see how it could be done with a macro that first copies and then
> deletes, since needs an argument from the user (the
> destination folder).
You can use the save-mes
On (27/07/01 07:51), Kalle Hasselström wrote:
> How can I make a simple command for moving messages between folders? I
> don't see how it could be done with a macro that first copies and then
> deletes, since needs an argument from the user (the
> destination folder).
s saves messages to a diff
Is it possible to display the message size in a more human readable format than bytes?
I'd like to see something like 20K or 3.3M if possible.
Dan
Hi dan,
* dan radom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010727 20:34]:
> Is it possible to display the message size in a more human readable format than
>bytes? I'd like to see something like 20K or 3.3M if possible.
your mail is more readable, if you limit the lines to 72 characters.
You´re looking for "ind
* dan radom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07/27/01 12:15]:
> Is it possible to display the message size in a more human readable
> format than bytes? I'd like to see something like 20K or 3.3M if
> possible.
I know that in the man page, for "%c" in index_format, it is said
"number of characters (bytes) i
I've been running some of my old mailboxes through procmail/formail
to resort a few things. I started getting some strange results and
I noticed that several of my mailboxes have stuff like this:
*It's important that you mFrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 20 17:35:06 2001
Date: Sun, 20 May 2001 17
Using 1.3.20i - is there any way to force mutt to check for
new IMAP messages every [x] seconds? I think there used to be
an option called imap_checkinterval or something... no more?
With some other IMAP clients I have used, new mail shows up
almost instantly... whether or not this is hard on t
On Friday, 27 July 2001 at 17:14, Mike A. Oligny wrote:
> Using 1.3.20i - is there any way to force mutt to check for
> new IMAP messages every [x] seconds? I think there used to be
> an option called imap_checkinterval or something... no more?
>
> With some other IMAP clients I have used, new m
Hi all! I've recently been hacking away at my .muttrc, and learning a
whole lot in the process ;) There's two things though that I'd like to
figure out (pointers to manpage entries welcome :).
First, I'd like it if the builtin pager did NOT jump to the next message when
I'm at
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 11:21:15PM -0400, Kyle Knack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> First, I'd like it if the builtin pager did NOT
> jump to the next message when I'm at the end and
> hit or .
This is what I have in my .muttrc:
# Do not move to next message when at the end
# of a message and wh
It could be your procmail recipe which does not lock.
Recipies that start with :0: use a lock, those which
start with :0 do not use a lock.
Example with lock:
:0:
* ^From foobar
/.../foobar-maibox
On Fri, Jul 27, 2001 at 05:36:36PM -0500, Chris Gentle ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've been r
14 matches
Mail list logo
