Re: Mutt 1.3.12

2001-01-08 Thread David T-G
Waldemar -- ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... % On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:54:19PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... ... % > % % > % Thanks a lot. Adding the User to group mail, solve the problem. % > % > Well, that's one way to do it, but the generally acce

Re: New mail detection

2001-01-08 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:23:25PM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote: > Hi! > > I'm sad - the detection of new mail is not working anymore :(( The worst thing is - >I can't even imagine, what might have > gone wrong. Can I somehow see, which mailboxes are being watched by Mutt? I have a >typica

Re: automatically move old mail?

2001-01-08 Thread Conor Daly
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 07:20:13PM -0800 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Mike E thought: > * sVennieboy ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > I was wondering if it is possible to automatically move "old" mail > > (say, older than a month) from my inbox to a different folder > > (inbox.old for exam

Re: automatically move old mail?

2001-01-08 Thread Dirk Ruediger
Hi. > I was wondering if it is possible to automatically move "old" mail > (say, older than a month) from my inbox to a different folder > (inbox.old for example). Pine does this, and I think it's usefull to > prevent my HD filling up with old mail (and not having to delete every > mail myself).

Re: New mail detection

2001-01-08 Thread Heinrich Langos
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Heinrich Langos wrote: > On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:23:25PM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm sad - the detection of new mail is not working anymore :(( The worst thing is >- I can't even imagine, what might have > > gone wrong. Can

Re: enhanced maildir-format

2001-01-08 Thread georg
On 01-01-07 11:59, Michael Elkins wrote: > > Please describe what support is missing. I'm not familiar with the > extensions used by those programs. > courier uses a so called "folder-extension". In a normal maildir there are only 3 dirs: new, cur, tmp. To store the imap-folder-structure courie

Re: enhanced maildir-format

2001-01-08 Thread georg
On 01-01-07 20:32, Bruno Postle wrote: > > Courier-imap Maildir names begin with a dot like this: > > $ ls -la > drwx-- 5 adam adam 1024 Oct 23 11:30 .scrap.cps > drwx-- 5 adam adam 1024 Oct 23 11:31 .scrap.jungle > drwx-- 5 adam adam

pgp encrypted attachment

2001-01-08 Thread Daniel Kollar
Hi! I often get mails with no text inside but a pgp encrypted msg as attachment. Because it is defined as a multi-part message, procmail and mutt does not recognize the pgp encryption. Parts of the msgs look like: -- [...] MIME

S/MIME commandline tools / mutt support?

2001-01-08 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
Hi! Are there any S/MIME command line tools that could be used with mutt? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] System Engineerinnominate AG Diplom-Informatiker the linux architects tel: +49.30.308806-62 fax: -698

Re: pgp encrypted attachment

2001-01-08 Thread Frank Naumann
Hello, On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:52:50PM +0100, Daniel Kollar wrote: > > Can procmail be instructed to remove the html stuff and to change the > mime type to "application/pgp" or what else is necessary ? > for the pgp stuff you can add: :0 * !^Content-Type: text/plain * !^Conte

Re: S/MIME commandline tools / mutt support?

2001-01-08 Thread Bennett Todd
2001-01-08-14:12:15 Ralf Hildebrandt: > Are there any S/MIME command line tools that could be used with mutt? The only one I've heard of is the OpenSSL command-line utility, openssl(1). But would integrating invocations of openssl's cmdline into mutt, call out the Debian license gestapo again? We

Forward attachment while replying to another mail

2001-01-08 Thread Clint Olsen
I have an email with an attachment. I have another email I want to reply and take the attachment from the other message. Is this doable in Mutt? Thanks, -Clint

Re: send-hook problem

2001-01-08 Thread Peter Dobrev
On Monday, January 08, 2001 at 06:36:55PM, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: > Hello Peter! > > On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, Peter Dobrev wrote: > > > ?? 07 ?? 2001?. (??) ? 20:14 , Martin ??: > > > On Sunday, January 07, 2001 (CS:7.01.007) 17:38:37 [PM] (-0200) > > > Peter Dobrev [[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: send-hook problem

2001-01-08 Thread Peter Dobrev
I just sorry !:) I was too stupid and didn't see the | at the one of my multi send-hook which and the problem is solved! Thanks a lot guys !:)

Re: Forward attachment while replying to another mail

2001-01-08 Thread D-Man
Yes : save the attachment from the first e-mail, then attach the file while replying to the second. -D On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 11:54:05AM -0800, Clint Olsen wrote: | I have an email with an attachment. I have another email I want to reply | and take the attachment from the other message. Is

losing mail because of too many "q"s

2001-01-08 Thread Andy Spiegl
Dear mutters, (please reply directly as I am no longer subscribed to the list. My connection here in PerĂº is unfortunately just too slow for that.) After composing a mail, more than one time it has happened to me that I pressed "q" one more time (in the compose menu) - for example after reviewi

Re: losing mail because of too many "q"s

2001-01-08 Thread Abhay Ghaisas
Hi, Andy Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote -- > > This works, but I don't like it. I'd rather have mutt ask me whether I > really want to abort the mail. Or even better a quad-option like "quit". Have you tried setting the "postpone" quad-option to something like "ask-no" or "ask-yes"? It's