folder hook for scrolling down?

2001-01-04 Thread Christoph Bugel
Hi, When I open some mailbox I get to the index window, and the 'cursor' is positioned on the first message (which is the oldest one). How can I tell mutt to automatically go to the last message? (now I have to type G to do that).

Re: folder hook for scrolling down?

2001-01-04 Thread Chris Gushue
Christoph Bugel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Hi, > > When I open some mailbox I get to the index window, and the 'cursor' is > positioned on the first message (which is the oldest one). How can I tell mutt > to automatically go to the last message? (now I have to type G to do that). This is w

Re: folder hook for scrolling down?

2001-01-04 Thread Christoph Bugel
Thanks for the tip. I now use the following, which works: folder-hook . push "G" quite simple ;) - that's what I like about mutt. (It is slower then pine, though, when opening folders..) > Christoph Bugel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > When I open some mailbox I get to the in

Mutt 1.3.12

2001-01-04 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hello Mutt-Users, Yesterday I have installed an actual unstable Mutt release with NNTP-Patch (from Volkov). Now I have two problems. First I want to have old behavior of "i", the Index of Newsgroups should be "F5" or so. Second my inbox is readonly, I can't toggle it with "%". My inbox-file i

Re: Mutt 1.3.12

2001-01-04 Thread David T-G
Waldemar -- ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... % ... % Second my inbox is readonly, I can't toggle it % with "%". % My inbox-file is a symbolic link to % /var/spool/mail/waldemar Have you checked your mutt_dotlock program (perhaps whichever is first in your path) to make sure it is setuid r

New mail detection

2001-01-04 Thread Nikolai Prokoschenko
Hi! I'm sad - the detection of new mail is not working anymore :(( The worst thing is - I can't even imagine, what might have gone wrong. Can I somehow see, which mailboxes are being watched by Mutt? I have a typical line "mailboxes `ls /home/nikolai/Mail/Mails/*`" in my .muttrc, but still - ne

Re: Mutt 1.3.12

2001-01-04 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:40:05AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Waldemar -- > > ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... > % > ... > % Second my inbox is readonly, I can't toggle it > % with "%". > % My inbox-file is a symbolic link to > % /var/spool/mail/waldemar > > Have you checked your mutt_dotl

Re: mail archives

2001-01-04 Thread Christoph Bugel
Did you also check the mail archive link from mutt.org? I noticed there are two: one to egroups and another on mutt.org > Greetings mutt friends, > > Can anyone help me find some mutt-user lore of old? The egroups > archive goes back to mid 1998, but I'm looking for some messages I > would h

Re: Mutt 1.3.12

2001-01-04 Thread David T-G
Waldemar -- ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... % On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:40:05AM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... % > ... % > % Second my inbox is readonly, I can't toggle it ... % > % > Have you checked your mutt_dotlock program (perhaps whichever is first

sending encrypted mail from command line

2001-01-04 Thread Pedro Zorzenon Neto
Hi, To send a text file using mutt from a cron script, I use: cat text_file.txt | mutt -s test_message user@address and it works fine. But I want to send this file encrypted... What do I need to do? Are there command line options to do it? Thanks, Pedro -- Why don'

Re: Mutt 1.3.12

2001-01-04 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 12:54:19PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Waldemar -- > > ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... > % On Thu, Jan 04, 2001 at 11:40:05AM -0500, David T-G wrote: > % > ...and then Waldemar Brodkorb said... > % > ... > % > % Second my inbox is readonly, I can't toggle it > ... > %

Re: New mail detection

2001-01-04 Thread Conor Daly
On Tue, Jan 02, 2001 at 11:23:25PM +0100 or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Nikolai Prokoschenko thought: > Hi! > > I'm sad - the detection of new mail is not working anymore :(( The worst thing is - >I can't even imagine, what might have > gone wrong. Can I somehow see, which mailboxes are being