Jan- Hendrik Palic wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 02:04:30PM +1100, raf wrote:
>
> |> I got a problem and I don't know, where the problem is.
> |>
> |> I sent yesterday a mail with several adresses in BCC- field. A friend, using
> |> Outlook on Windows ME (I thing Outlook 5.5) is able to see
Can Mutt work on a Windows based system ?
if not does anyone know of a text based email client that will work with
windows? that also supports POP and POP3.
Thanks,
Steve
Member Support
www.photopoint.com
P.S.
Our new MarketPlace makes it even easier to order prints, gifts and more
from
th
Hi,
On 00-11-20, Michael Elkins wrote:
>> So I ask myself, what's 'from' all about?
>`from' sets the default From: line in the mail header. The sendmail -f
>option sents the envelope return address (what normally goes in the From
>line of mbox format mailboxes).
OK I tested this. There's no diff
hi,
(please cc replies to me, as i could not handle yet another busy list ;)
i've been using mutt for a while now. one thing that's always bugged me
(well, pretty much the only thing, now that i know about mime_forward),
is that there's no way that i can find to have a "compose" window as a
kind
I need to be able to send a mail message from the command line which allows
me to attach a file. Can this be done without having the mail screen appear
and making me select y to send the message ???
thanking you in advance
Regards,
Steve Marcionni
Power Business Systems
Tel: +61 8 92211182
Fa
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:15:39PM -0400, Steve wrote:
> Can Mutt work on a Windows based system ?
> if not does anyone know of a text based email client that will work with
> windows? that also supports POP and POP3.
>
There's Pine, I think you can still get a DOS version of that which
would pr
On Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 03:15:39PM -0400, Steve wrote:
> Can Mutt work on a Windows based system ?
> if not does anyone know of a text based email client that will work with
> windows? that also supports POP and POP3.
http://www.gnt.net/~n5ial/mutt/building_mutt_on_win.html
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:29:14PM +0800, Steve Marcionni wrote:
> I need to be able to send a mail message from the command line which allows
> me to attach a file. Can this be done without having the mail screen appear
> and making me select y to send the message ???
mutt -a file recipient < /d
Moin,
On 00-11-22, Steve wrote:
>if not does anyone know of a text based email client that will work with
>windows? that also supports POP and POP3.
Sort of. It's intended for discussion networks, but very powerful:
Crosspoint
It's probably too big for a few mails.
Thorsten
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 03:29:14PM +0800, Steve Marcionni wrote:
> I need to be able to send a mail message from the command line which allows
> me to attach a file. Can this be done without having the mail screen appear
> and making me select y to send the message ???
Yes, compose your message i
On 2000-11-23 03:56:47 +, Jan- Hendrik Palic wrote:
> My MTA is exim on potato, exim 3.12 and my mutt is a selfcompiled
> mutt-1.2.5-4. Whats going wrong?
Exim.
write_bcc
Type: boolean
Default: yes
Controls whether mutt writes out the Bcc header when
Thorsten Haude proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> Didn't test that. I may need it for my alias mungling. How do you
> handle different aliases (eg. for mailing lists)?
Take a look at part of my .muttrc (used with set envelope_from)
folder-hook . set sort=threads
folder-hook . set signature=/tm
Apologies for cc'ing Mike Elkins on the last post - didnt notice Thorsten
Haude's incorrectly set mail-followup-to header, which included M.E :(
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber Cartel of India, tinlcI
You will feel hungry again in anothe
Hi,
>didnt notice Thorsten Haude's incorrectly set mail-followup-to header
So didn't I. How can I fix it?
Thorsten
Hi list,
I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1e-SuSE to encrypt my mail. One of the commands
configured in my pgp.rc is
#set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
--batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys %r"
which does not work. The output is not fully visible, but I
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 07:26:13PM +1100, raf wrote:
Hi
[... Bcc-field was shown in Outlook an KMAIL... ]
|sorry about that. i was being stupid.
|do the intended bcc recipients receive the mail?
yes, they did and they're able to read the Bcc-field
|if not, then it's not being recognised a
Hi Thorsten Haude !
On Thu 23 Nov 2000 (15:28), you muttered on the list:
> Hi list,
>
> I use gpg (GnuPG) 1.0.1e-SuSE to encrypt my mail. One of the commands
> configured in my pgp.rc is
> #set pgp_getkeys_command="gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-verbose \
> --batch --with-colons --keyserver wwwk
Hi,
I am using Mutt in an Eterm. There is some bad behaviour, I guess it's
coming from Eterm, with the function keys F1-F5. Pressing F1 in Eterm
does not show the Manual: the key is not defined.
Xterm : ^[OQ
Eterm : ^[[11~
$ echo $TERM
xterm
Keys F6-F12 are working normal. Anyt
On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 07:44:44PM -0500, Greg Whitlock wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 01:45:10AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> #
> # This issue has come up before, and I have some vague memories about a
> # patch that would set the file access time to 1 second before the file
> # modification
Add this to the keyboard section of the MAIN file for the theme you use for
mutt:
# F1 - F4 since xterm sends different codes for these mutt is looking for them
# instead of what Eterm sends by default.
keysym 0xFFBE "^[OP"
keysym 0xFFBF "^[OQ"
keysym 0xFFC0 "^[OR"
keysym 0xFFC1 "^[OS"
FYI this
On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 10:26:53AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
|On 2000-11-23 03:56:47 +, Jan- Hendrik Palic wrote:
|
|> My MTA is exim on potato, exim 3.12 and my mutt is a selfcompiled
|> mutt-1.2.5-4. Whats going wrong?
|
|Exim.
|
| write_bcc
| Type: boolean
| Default:
21 matches
Mail list logo
