I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
right at the beginning of a new version. This new version incorporates
RSA which I und
Hello mutt-developers,
here is a feature request for future versions of mutt:
Mutt looks for the PGPPASS environment variable. If this is set, then
no passphrase is needed to be send to pgp program, because pgp looks
for the PGPPASS variable by itself.
Mutt will also not ask the user for the pas
I use mutt since some months and has all the features I can
imagine. Great. But one thing I am missing: Sometimes I want to edit a
mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend
it. (OK, I could resent it to myself, but that's not a nice solution)
Has someone an solution?
Thomas Guettler proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend
> it. (OK, I could resent it to myself, but that's not a nice solution)
> Has someone an solution?
You can postpone messages.
mallet@mjollnir~> grep postpone .muttrc
set
Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
> right at the beginning of a new version. This new ve
I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting
"color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick
that I'm missing?
Mike
--
Mike Erickson http://www.quidquam.com/
"Hatred is the coward's revenge for being intimidated" - George Bernard Sh
Don't do that.
Storing the pgp pass phrase in an environment variable may have been
a valid option on MS-DOS computers. It isn't on Unix machines,
since the environment is not guaranteed to be confidential.
Also, what's the point in using a shell script like the one below?
- There is no reason
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
> right at th
> Don't do that.
>
> Storing the pgp pass phrase in an environment variable may have been
> a valid option on MS-DOS computers. It isn't on Unix machines,
> since the environment is not guaranteed to be confidential.
I'm working on unix.
In the PGP CmdLineGuide you will find a section about th
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent. I had got in
> right at th
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 11:00:01AM +0200, Thomas Guettler wrote:
> I use mutt since some months and has all the features I can
> imagine. Great. But one thing I am missing: Sometimes I want to edit a
> mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend
> it. (OK, I could resent
Dan Boger writes:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 05:02:57PM +0930, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > I recently decided to try GnuPG after using only pgp2 off and on for
> > some years. It was only after I downloaded it and played with it for a
> > while, that I realised that version 1.0.3 was very recent.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 01:51:13PM +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote:
> In the PGP CmdLineGuide you will find a section about this.
> There you can read that using this feature is safe when you use in in
> a environment where no one else has access to it.
>
> I'm doing that. The environment is only acti
On 2000-10-20 13:51:13 +0200, Daniel Kollar wrote:
> I'm doing that. The environment is only active as long as mutt is
> open. No one from outside can access it.
That's your particular environment. However, mutt is designed in a
way which makes it suitable for use on real multi-user systems.
Yo
Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000:
> I use mutt since some months and has all the features I can
> imagine. Great. But one thing I am missing: Sometimes I want to edit a
> mail, and then save it. I think it is only possible to edit and resend
> it. (OK, I could resent i
From a bash prompt, try running:
COLUMNS= ps ae | grep mutt
and see if you don't change your mind about using PGPPASS.
--
Bob Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
"Just don't create a file called -rf. :-)"
--
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote:
> I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting
> "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick
> that I'm missing?
>
Perhaps you should try colour instead :)
Seriously, can you post a few lines befor
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:50:03PM +0800, Anthony Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote:
> > I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting
> > "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick
> > that I'm missing?
> >
> Perhaps yo
On 20 Oct 2000, at 22:50, Anthony Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote:
> > I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting
> > "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is there some trick
> > that I'm missing?
> >
> Perhaps you should try col
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:29:17AM -0600, Harold Oga wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2000, at 22:50, Anthony Liu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote:
> > > I'm trying to set up color with mutt (1.2.5i) but I am getting
> > > "color: unknown command" errors from my muttrc. Is ther
Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try
ncurses
* Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001020 11:56]:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:29:17AM -0600, Harold Oga wrote:
> > On 20 Oct 2000, at 22:50, Anthony Liu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 02:56:30AM -0700, Mike E wrote:
>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:01:13PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try
> ncurses
here is the full output of mutt -v
Mutt 1.2.5i (2000-07-28)
Copyright (C) 1996-2000 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRA
* Mike E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001020 12:14]:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:01:13PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try
> > ncurses
As I said, the curses lib doesn't support color...
Here is my mutt -v:
Mutt 1.3.10i (2000-10-11)
Co
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Mike E wrote:
> System: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE [using ncurses 1.8.6/ache]
You'd better obtain more recent version of ncurses and recompile.
I have version 4.2 while you have only 1.8.6.
--
Eugene Paskevich | *==(--- |
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Mike E wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 12:01:13PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > Sounds like your curses lib doesn't support color. You might try
> > ncurses
>
> here is the full output of mutt -v
that version "does", but mutt's configure script does not recognize i
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 04:25:32PM +0300, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Yes, upgrade to 1.2.5, which has a nice "edit-message" function.
>
> Actually, the same functionality is in 1.0.1 too, when you select
> a message for "edit and resend", you can use the w(rite) command
> to write it back to the fol
Daniel J Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000:
> Hmm... the 1.0.1 functionality seems more useful to me. Is there any
> way to edit and resend a message in 1.2.5?
Sure, esc-e (the default key binding for it anyway), the function is
called resend-message.
The original 1.0 function
On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 08:43:13PM +0300, Eugene Paskevich wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2000 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Mike E wrote:
> > System: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE [using ncurses 1.8.6/ache]
> You'd better obtain more recent version of ncurses and recompile.
> I have version 4.2 while you have
Hi,
I've been testing Mutt, trying to get it quite close to what I'm used to w/
Pine.
One question about PGP; I get the following at the top of the PGP messages:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Oct 20 23:04:51 2000) --]
< cut gpg messages >
[-- End of PGP output --]
[-- The followin
Hi,
I've been trying to get used to Mutt. It's not too easy when you have like
5 years of Pine experience behind you.
Anyway, I was wondering if there is a Pine-to-Mutt conversion HOWTO or FAQ.
I'm _sure_ that would be needed. I sure as hell needed one myself, and had
to go through this maili
Pekka Savola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 20 Oct 2000:
> Anyway, I was wondering if there is a Pine-to-Mutt conversion HOWTO or FAQ.
I've not heard of one, but I never did use Pine much so I haven't even
looked, or paid much attention.
> I'm _sure_ that would be needed.
Right, one would be
31 matches
Mail list logo
