Mon Sep 4 08:25:17 BST 2000
Using e (edit current message as template)
on the message you are interested in forwarding
will allow you to delete which ever attachments
that you're not interested in forwarding.
--
-primus
On Sun, Sep 03, 2000 at 06:09:06PM -0700, Austin Schutz wrote:
| >
|
Hello!
I have to write two shell scripts. One to check a file, and send it via
Email to the other script. The second script has to get the attached
file back from the Email and install it.
The file which is attached is a PGP signed Tarball.
It is send via
mutt -a files.tar.pgp -s "Subject" [E
Sitting at the campfire, André Dahlqvist told:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 08:40:59PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>
> > my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andre' Dahlqvist)
> > set envelope_from
>
> But in what cases should one have to use that? I mean what I'm using
> now seams to work almo
Using a large mallet, Subba Rao whacked out:
> I would like to be able to send messages to some people with customized
> signatures and for some I want a trimmed down signature file.
> Is there anyway to be able to select from a list of signature files for
> a message?
Use folder hooks / send ho
Ken W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sun, 03 Sep 2000:
> Hi. I just upgraded from 1.0 to 1.2.5 and notice that mutt does not
> insert by default the x-mailer header. I didn't see this in the
> upgrade readme. Is this intentional?
Yes. Mutt now creates the User-Agent header instead of X-Mailer
On 2000-09-03 23:28:07 -0400, Ken W wrote:
> Hi. I just upgraded from 1.0 to 1.2.5 and notice that mutt does
> not insert by default the x-mailer header. I didn't see this in
> the upgrade readme. Is this intentional?
It was renamed to User-Agent.
> Also, Sorry if this is a dumb question, bu
On Mon, Sep 4, 2000, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Yes. Mutt now creates the User-Agent header instead of X-Mailer.
> User-Agent is preferred over X-Mailer.
Ah, thanks.
> It sounds like whenever you edit an email message text with vim, and
> save and exit, vim creates a backup copy of the original.
On 0, Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using a large mallet, Subba Rao whacked out:
>
> > I would like to be able to send messages to some people with customized
> > signatures and for some I want a trimmed down signature file.
> > Is there anyway to be able to select from a l
Hi Subba Rao !
On Sat 02 Sep 2000 (09:26), you muttered on the list:
> I would like to be able to send messages to some people with customized
> signatures and for some I want a trimmed down signature file.
>
> Is there anyway to be able to select from a list of signature files for
> a messag
Hello people,
Thanks again for your help with the pine-like "expunge" a couple weeks back.
I now have some questions regarding flock and fcntl.
My current arrangement is; Box B has an nfs share with users home
directories. Box A receives email with sendmail. Box A has the nfs share
from B mou
Federico Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 04 Sep 2000:
> - why would one choose flock or fcntl?
I don't know the details about the locking methods, but I guess there
isn't really any technical reason to prefer either flock, fcntl or
dotlock over another. The most important thing is that b
11 matches
Mail list logo
