On 1999-10-12 15:37:27 -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Seems like it would be just as easy to use edit-message, change the
> message around, then when you're done, go ahead and the
> resulting edited message. Doesn't sound too difficult, and works with
> current code.
This depends on the user's
On Mon, Oct 11, 1999 at 22:24:10 +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> I've just uploaded mutt 1.0pre4 to ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/. I
> sincerely hope that this is the last version from the release
> candidate series.
Shouldn't the X-Mailer header be replaced by a User-Agent header?
--
Vincent Lefèvre
Michael Thies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 13 Oct 1999:
> And quit that message without postponing it. .-)
Well, if you create a special macro, it's possible to set the
$postpone variable temporarily to "no", and restore it to "ask-yes" (or
whatever you prefer) after you're finished with edi
When a msg comes from a mailing-list and there is a 'To:' line
in the header but no 'Reply-To:', is there any way to get mutt
to reply to the 'To:' line rather than the 'From:' line?
--
John
Hi,
I have two problems with mutt :
1. I am not able to rebind 'N' key. This is what I use in .muttrc :
bind pager N search-opposite
bind generic N search-opposite
but it won't work. What am I doing wrong ?
2. Is there a way to force mutt not to overwrite the folder when I
change
Gosh, I am sure this one has been covered a few times, but here
goes: Filtering.
Anyone know of a good FAQ with the subject of
filtering mailbox's included in it?
Or better yet, can you break it down here now for us all? :)
Thankz!
--
Loren
Ending a sentence in a preposition is something
rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the message is edited ("e"), the bounce function is disabled, and
> "b" results in a Bcc: query instead of bouncing the message as it
> normally would.
As someone else pointed out, what I mean was to edit the message, save
the edited message back to the fold
John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When a msg comes from a mailing-list and there is a 'To:' line in the
> header but no 'Reply-To:', is there any way to get mutt to reply to
> the 'To:' line rather than the 'From:' line?
list-reply ?
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human e
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 06:00:41PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
> When a msg comes from a mailing-list and there is a 'To:' line
> in the header but no 'Reply-To:', is there any way to get mutt
> to reply to the 'To:' line rather than the 'From:' line?
Add the list's address to the 'lists' line i
John Poltorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 13 Oct 1999:
> When a msg comes from a mailing-list and there is a 'To:' line
> in the header but no 'Reply-To:', is there any way to get mutt
> to reply to the 'To:' line rather than the 'From:' line?
Use the "list-reply" function, by default bound
John Poltorak [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> When a msg comes from a mailing-list and there is a 'To:' line
> in the header but no 'Reply-To:', is there any way to get mutt
> to reply to the 'To:' line rather than the 'From:' line?
See the manual regarding the use of the 'lists' command to define m
Loren Schooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone know of a good FAQ with the subject of filtering mailbox's
> included in it?
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mail/filtering-faq/index.html
Try using a web search tool sometime.
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on th
Loren Schooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 13 Oct 1999:
> Anyone know of a good FAQ with the subject of
> filtering mailbox's included in it?
I think there's a Mail Filtering FAQ available. Yep, found it:
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mail/filtering-faq/
> Or better yet, can you break it down
Take a look at the Procmail FAQ
Original site:
http://www.iki.fi/era/procmail/
Mirrors:
North America
http://mirror.ncsa.uiuc.edu/procmail-faq/
http://www.zer0.org/procmail/
http://www.moongroup.com/unix/procmail/
Europe
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sister/mirror
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 01:23:05PM -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 06:00:41PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
>
> > When a msg comes from a mailing-list and there is a 'To:' line
> > in the header but no 'Reply-To:', is there any way to get mutt
> > to reply to the 'To:' line rather
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 07:57:22PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 01:23:05PM -0400, Jon Parise wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 06:00:41PM +0100, John Poltorak wrote:
> >
> > > When a msg comes from a mailing-list and there is a 'To:' line
> > > in the header but no 'Reply
Hi Vincent,
you wrote on Wed, Oct 13 1999:
>>I've just uploaded mutt 1.0pre4 to ftp.mutt.org/pub/mutt/. I
>>sincerely hope that this is the last version from the release
>>candidate series.
>Shouldn't the X-Mailer header be replaced by a User-Agent header?
By the way: if you edit a message, t
Hi all,
I don't know what the sys admin did to our system, but it seems I get
repeatedly stuck sending, receiving and/or replying mail :)
Current problem has something to do with locking, as it seems: saving
a message to a mailbox, or sending a new message (which will also be
saved) results in a
On [19991013 21:30], John Poltorak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>A number of people have mentioned that I'm adding the two lines
>above to my headers, but I'm pretty sure they are added by the
>mailing list software - I can't see any options where I could be
>adding anyt
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 12:37:09PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Loren Schooley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know of a good FAQ with the subject of filtering mailbox's
> > included in it?
>
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/mail/filtering-faq/index.html
>
There is something much newer
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 12:18:17PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> rex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If the message is edited ("e"), the bounce function is disabled, and
>
> As someone else pointed out, what I mean was to edit the message, save
> the edited message back to the folder, then b
Sorry for the off topic question... can any of you recommend any GUI MUAs
that support PGP/MIME instead of just old-style? I've got some people I'm
moving from Windows to Linux, and this is one of the overriding needs for a
MUA for them.
Thanks.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
hi,
i had try something like
folder-hook ~/Mail 'push '
but obviously(?) it does nt work. However, no error reading the .muttrc.
what's really obvious is that i did nt understand how 'folder-hook' works.
are there any mistakes?
--
richard Hitier
Hi,
Don't know about if they will support pgp/MIME. But all the X11 mail
clients are very alpha. And IMO, these are two of the best which
supports both pgp and mime..
http://ishmail.linuxbox.com/
http://xfmail.slappy.org/
Also, how hard will it be
Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Don't know about if they will support pgp/MIME. But all the X11 mail
> clients are very alpha. And IMO, these are two of the best which
> supports both pgp and mime..
Before this swings wide open, let me be perfectly clear: I'm interested
On Tuesday, 12 October 1999 at 10:18, Raju K V wrote:
> hi,
>
> I am attaching the .muttdebug0 which I got after running mutt -d4. The
> password has been blanked out.
[SNIP]
> mutt_socket_write():a0004 FETCH 1:5 (FLAGS INTERNALDATE RFC822.SIZE
>BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (DATE FROM SUBJECT TO CC
On [19991014 07:01], Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Sorry for the off topic question... can any of you recommend any GUI MUAs
>that support PGP/MIME instead of just old-style? I've got some people I'm
>moving from Windows to Linux, and this is one of the overriding needs for a
>MUA fo
On [19991013 20:14], Goran Koruga ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>1. I am not able to rebind 'N' key. This is what I use in .muttrc :
>
> bind pager N search-opposite
> bind generic N search-opposite
>
> but it won't work. What am I doing wrong ?
unbind N f
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 07:20:29AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> On [19991014 07:01], Jeremy Blosser ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Sorry for the off topic question... can any of you recommend any GUI MUAs
> >that support PGP/MIME instead of just old-style? I've got some people I'm
> >mov
29 matches
Mail list logo
