There were four file descriptor leaks in the old versions of the
compressed folders patch. The attached patch fixes this problem.
The patch can be applied after most versions of the compressed folders
patch it should work with 0.95.*, 0.96.* and 1.0pre*.
Ciao
Roland
--
* [EMAIL PRO
Brian -
And on Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 11:54:40AM +0930 it was said by Brian Salter-Duke:
| This does exactly what you asked for and is much shorter than the one I
| posted a while back.
|
| #!/usr/local/bin/perl
| $file = $ARGV[0];
| $base = $file;
| $base =~ s?\.gz??;
| print "Type the directory
Hi,
according to the manual:
Usage: send-hook [!]pattern command
This command can be used to execute arbitrary configuration commands
based upon recipients of the message. pattern is a regular expression
matching the desired address. command is executed when regexp matches
recipient
J Horacio MG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 29 Sep 1999:
> macro generic \e0 "!~/sigscript\r"
> send-hook '~C anyone@anyplace\.com' "push \e0"
> send-hook '~C anyone@anyplace\.com' "set signature=~/timeup.sig"
> If there's a better way to get this, I'd like to know, but would also
> like to kn
Is there a simple way to configure mutt to move messages to a specific (trash)
folder when the delete operation is called? This will allow me to recover
deleted messages and purge the trash folder of very old messages via a cron
job.
--
John Benninghoff
Hello,
I am quite new with mutt, so please forgive me
if the quetion is stupid.
I have got two mailboxes =friends and =to_friends.
If I change from the +friends mailbox to the other one
the message 'New mail in =to_friends.' appears in the
status-line though this is not true. If I then change
ba
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Alexander Dvorak t2069 wrote:
> I have got two mailboxes =friends and =to_friends.
> If I change from the +friends mailbox to the other one
> the message 'New mail in =to_friends.' appears in the
> status-line though this is not true. If I then change
> back to =to_friends mu
John Benninghoff Linux" [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is there a simple way to configure mutt to move messages to a specific (trash)
> folder when the delete operation is called? This will allow me to recover
> deleted messages and purge the trash folder of very old messages via a cron
> job.
The
Staffan Hämälä writes:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Alexander Dvorak t2069 wrote:
[...]
Staffan's mail has a duplicate
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
header. A problem with that release?
--
After a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn.
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 07:34:44PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Staffan Hämälä writes:
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Alexander Dvorak t2069 wrote:
> [...]
> Staffan's mail has a duplicate
> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
> header. A problem with that release?
I'm not seeing it on my mail and I'm
> > Staffan's mail has a duplicate
>
> > X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
>
> > header. A problem with that release?
>
> I'm not seeing it on my mail and I'm using that release. Do you
> see duplicates on this message?
Nope, yours is fine.
The only other duplicate X-Mailer: in this month'
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The only other duplicate X-Mailer: in this month's mutt-users archive
> was marked Mutt 0.95.7i. So it may be a local/config problem.
There is a bug that causes the X-Mailer to be re-added to the headers,
whenever a message is postponed and recalled.
Lars Hecking:
> > > Staffan's mail has a duplicate
> >
> > > X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
> >
> > > header. A problem with that release?
> >
> > I'm not seeing it on my mail and I'm using that release. Do you
> > see duplicates on this message?
>
> Nope, yours is fine.
>
> The only othe
Alexander Dvorak t2069 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 29 Sep
1999:
> The folders reside on an NFS directory
> and mails are delivered in these folders with
> .procmail.
Like others, I recommend switching to Maildir folders if you are reading
your mail from NFS-mounted disk. Not that I've eve
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't want to update the N flags, so I press $ to sync the
> folder, then % to avoid writing changes on exit. After that, when
> I change to another folder, Mutt tells me that I have "New mail in
> =FolderIJustLeft". This is more of a minor annoyan
I am getting the same problem reported about mutt telling of new mail
in mailboxes, but there is nothing there. I keeps on telling me that
I have new mail in my spool folder and also in a regular maiulbox
under ~/Mail. Every time I go to either there is nothing new there.
This has been happening
Ken W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am getting the same problem reported about mutt telling of new mail
> in mailboxes, but there is nothing there. I keeps on telling me that
> I have new mail in my spool folder and also in a regular maiulbox
> under ~/Mail. Every time I go to either there is
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
> Mutt checks mbox folders by examing the time stamp information.
>
> Try these commands, when Mutt is reporting new mail:
>
> ls -l /path/to/spool/file(modified time)
> ls -lu /path/to/spool/file(accessed time)
Ken W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ls -l /path/to/spool/file (modified time)
> > ls -lu /path/to/spool/file (accessed time)
>
> Thanks, David. The times were indeed different when I checked just
> now since it reported new mail again.
Mutt should only repo
Hi folks!
Thanks to the help of four other mutt friends, RPMs for mutt-1.0pre3 are now
available:
Version | US | international
---+--+---
RHL 5.2/i386 | Y | Y
RHL 5.2/sparc | Y | soon
RHL 6.0/i386 | Y | soon
RHL 6.0/sparc | soon |
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 29 Sep 1999:
> In maildir folders, mail with the "N" status is placed in the "new"
> subdir. And so are messages that have been newly delivered.
Right, yes, understood.
> So, Mutt
> can't tell the difference between these two types of messages.
Hi,
Is there a way to bind the following two keys to behave like
this?
bind r reply include = yes
bind R reply include = no
Thanks.
Shao.
--
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 __
Shao Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 30 Sep 1999:
> bind r reply include = yes
> bind R reply include = no
Hmmm, something like:
macro index r ":set include=yes\n"
macro index R ":set include=no\n"
I think?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] //
23 matches
Mail list logo
