I think it's look like a bug. I read that mutt converts `non-
printable' chars into question marks -- if someone need it it's
ok, but i want to turn it off. Unfortunately there are two `stan-
dards' in Poland -- iso-8859-2 and cp-1250, sometimes I also get
some mail with charset us-ascii, though i
When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
folders as it comes in.
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990701 15:33]:
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my SMTP
> service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver the mail?
Probably...
> This way I can filter it into appropri
On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 02:43:37PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
> SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
> the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
> If you use (bound to "D" by default), you can give it a
> pattern of "! ~N ! ~O", which means "Not new and not old". It sets the
> delete flag on all the messages meeting that criteria.
>
> Maybe instead of "alias" you meant "macro", like so:
>
> macro index ~ "!~N !~O"
Hello again!
I
Daniel Bauke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately there are two `standards' in Poland -- iso-8859-2 and
> cp-1250, sometimes I also get some mail with charset us-ascii, though
> it contains iso or cp chars.
Mutt is supposed to "recode" the message from the character set that the
originato
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > macro index ~ "!~N !~O"
>
> I just got around to trying it, but I can't get it to work. It will
> mark all the messages in the current folder for deletion (even those
> marked N or O).
I didn't just write the above macro off-the-cuff. I ac
Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990701 15:33]:
> > When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> > directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my SMTP
> > service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver the mail?
>
> Pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> And where can I read up on macros? I can't find it in the docs on the web
> site.
http://www.mutt.org/ --> Manual --> 3.5 Keyboard Macros -->
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#ss3.5
See also
http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-3.html#bi
> When I 'G'et mail using POP3 internal to mutt, it writes
> directly to my mailbox. Is there a way to pass it to my
> SMTP service (I'm using qmail) instead and have it deliver
> the mail? This way I can filter it into appropriate
> folders as it comes in.
Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm usin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
> over here.
Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
to leave mutt.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Why not use fetchmail instead? I'm using qmail+fetchmail+procmail+mutt
> > over here.
> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
> to leave mutt.
Write a macro that will call fetchmail. Should work, but I don't use
fetchmail.
randy
--
Fiv
Hello, I've got a slight problem, or at least that's how I view it.
I've been using an outbox of just one file, outbox, and not using
the force_name setting. My question is this: Is there any way to
parse through my outbox and make each mail go to it's own new
mailbox, like what would happen
On 1999-07-01 13:35:33 -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> Unfortunately the documentation of this alleged process is so
> sparse that I have been unable to determine how one goes about
> setting up this recoding process. As far as I can tell, it is only
> understood by the people that wrote the code
On 1999-07-01 10:28:27 +0200, Daniel Bauke wrote:
> I think it's look like a bug. I read that mutt converts `non-
> printable' chars into question marks -- if someone need it it's ok,
> but i want to turn it off. Unfortunately there are two `stan-
> dards' in Poland -- iso-8859-2 and cp-1250, som
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have to leave
> mutt.
So don't leave Mutt.
macro index G "fetchmail"
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man real
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You mean, the documentation doesn't exist. That's because things are
> supposed to happen automagically...
Yes, they are "supposed to", but since there is no information on how
the process works, if things don't happen the way they are supposed to,
Sven Guckes [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Did somebody say "changes"? Here, take a look at the history:
> http://www.math.fu-berlin.de/~guckes/mutt/hist.html
FYI, all the 'changelog' links on this page seem to be dead.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn
On Thu, Jul 01, 1999 at 06:23:17PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> "David" == David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
David> Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have to leave
David> mutt.
David> So
On 1999-07-01 14:46:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Me too. Just thought it might be convenient sometimes to not have
> to leave mutt.
So just run fetchmail in daemon mode.
On Thu Jul 1 22:27:54 1999,
Thomas Roessler wrote [To Mutt User List]:
> > I think it's look like a bug. I read that mutt converts `non-
> > printable' chars into question marks -- if someone need it it's ok,
> > but i want to turn it off. Unfortunately there are two `stan-
> > dards' in Poland
Hi,
I am trying to get my PGP work with mutt.
I have set the option pgp_autosign.
But my sent message acutally looks like:
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Jul 2 15:06:22 1999) --]
File '/tmp/mutt-haydn-3208-4.$00' has signature, but w
Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I am trying to get my PGP work with mutt.
> But my sent message acutally looks like:
> [-- PGP output follows (current time: Fri Jul 2 15:06:22 1999) --]
...
> [-- End of PGP output --]
>
> [-- The following data
23 matches
Mail list logo
