Re: ignore

1999-05-20 Thread Anonymous
Hi, Joshua N Pritikin! Sometime (on Wednesday, May 19 at 19:06) I've received something... >Hi! > >First of all, thanks for developing such a great piece of software! > >I am interested in seeing all the mail headers and then pruning them >down. However, this doesn't seem to work: > > unign

Re: mutt-announce unused?

1999-05-20 Thread Schröder, Martin
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

MS Outlook Conversion

1999-05-20 Thread John C Borkowski III
Does anyone have any Ideas on how to Convert some 8000 messages in a MS Outlook *.pst file to some think mutt manageable? Ideally I would like to pass it all through Procmail to handle all my filtering etc. Thanks in advance John

Re: MS Outlook Conversion

1999-05-20 Thread Grant Beattie
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 10:43:47AM -0400, John C Borkowski III wrote: > Does anyone have any Ideas on how to Convert some 8000 > messages in a MS Outlook *.pst file to some think > mutt manageable? Best way I can think of is upload them all to an IMAP folder and get Mutt to read that. g.

Re: "default" color with slang

1999-05-20 Thread David DeSimone
Paul A . <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At first I just thought that's the way it works, but I've noticed that > lynx with slang (and without any COLORFGBG variable) does exactly what > I want, so it looks to me like there's something mutt could be doing > differently. I believe that Mutt uses sl

Re: mutt-announce unused?

1999-05-20 Thread Axel Beckert
Schröder, Martin wrote: > > > I didn't see any announcement here either,... was there one? > > Subject: [Announce] New versions. > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Did anybody get it on -users or -announce? I didn't. I didn't get any of them. Regards, Axel -- Axel Beckert - [

2 questions

1999-05-20 Thread Brent Hueth
Thanks for the response. I'll have to check into procmail. Sounds like heaven. Until then, mutt is still not allowing me to save to the directory in ~/Mail. The error mutt reports is "~/Mail/mutt-users is not a mailbox" An ls -l on my ~/Mail directory produces: drwx--x--x 2 bhueth bhueth

Re: 2 questions

1999-05-20 Thread David DeSimone
Brent Hueth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The error mutt reports is "~/Mail/mutt-users is not a mailbox" You should look at the mailbox to see what's wrong with it. > drwx--x--x 2 bhueth bhueth 1024 May 18 09:25 debian-users > drwxr-xr-x 2 bhueth bhueth 2048 May 20 12:44 dra

Re: 2 questions

1999-05-20 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=SNIs70sCzqvszXB4; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: mutt-announce unused?

1999-05-20 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=2FkSFaIQeDFoAt0B; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: MS Outlook Conversion

1999-05-20 Thread Ronny Haryanto
On 20-May-1999, John C Borkowski III wrote: > Does anyone have any Ideas on how to Convert some 8000 > messages in a MS Outlook *.pst file to some think > mutt manageable? I believe I saw something called MSToNS in linuxapps.com that can convert from Outlook Express (ultimately anything that can

Re: MS Outlook Conversion

1999-05-20 Thread Peter van Dijk
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Ronny Haryanto wrote: > On 20-May-1999, John C Borkowski III wrote: > > Does anyone have any Ideas on how to Convert some 8000 > > messages in a MS Outlook *.pst file to some think > > mutt manageable? > > I believe I saw something called MSToNS in linuxa