I received mail from several mutt-users, who are interested in my document
on how to configure the sendmail genericstable for use with dynamic ip
connections. The genericstable is very useful for everyone who uses dial up
internet connections and sendmail.
Since it's really off topic and since
How can one cancel an "unignore" command?
I would like to unignore delivered-to only in some folder.
For instance:
folder-hook . ???
folder-hook my_folder unignore delivered-to
What should the ??? be? (it isn't "ignore delivered-to", as unignore
has the priority.)
--
Vincent Lefevre <[EMAI
Hi
Forgive me if I should address this elsewhere, but the quality of this list
is so high, its just too difficult to resist - ok, I'll stop.
I want to send the output of a unix process (i.e. a text stream) by mail as
an attached text file _non_ interactively. I loathe making tmp files and
then d
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=7pXD3OQNRL3RjWCz; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Axel Beckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO it would be much more useful, if jump would accept any non-digit
> as terminator of the message number to jump to and would the push that
> last typed character to execute the appropriate function.
Hmm, I don't like that idea, probably because I'm
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 11:36:55AM +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
> I want to send the output of a unix process (i.e. a text stream) by mail as
> an attached text file _non_ interactively. I loathe making tmp files and
> then deleting them and would like to keep this all in memory using
> variables.
>
David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a way, though it's a bit odd. The trick is to make a FIFO (a la
> "named pipe").
That works, but it doesn't meet the stated requirements, because you'd
have to remember to delete the file that was created. He said he was
trying not to have to d
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 12:54:34PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote:
> David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There is a way, though it's a bit odd. The trick is to make a FIFO (a la
> > "named pipe").
>
> That works, but it doesn't meet the stated requirements, because you'd
> have to remembe
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:09:54PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> mutt -s subject to@there < textfile
>
> If you're not relying on any special mutt features you're probably better
> off using /bin/mail or /bin/mailx instead or whatever your OS provides.
mutt -s subject to@there <<__EOM__
Dear
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> Marek, et al --
>
> Better yet, if there was something you wanted to then go back and
> process in that folder, just his '%' to set the mailbox as read-only
> (and thus prevent a write) and then 'c'hange back to the same mailbox
That's a goo
Hi,
I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a
certain criteria (usually by sender's email addr), when I'm done, I
would like to go back to my full inbox. But there's no "unlimit" key
definition (or indication of it in help). What I do now is to enter a
limit string that ma
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:33:45PM -0700, Robert Chien said:
> I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a
> certain criteria (usually by sender's email addr), when I'm done, I
> would like to go back to my full inbox. But there's no "unlimit" key
> definition (or indication
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 09:12:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 07:47:43PM -0500, G. T. Francisco wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:33:45PM -0700, Robert Chien said:
> > > I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a
> > > certain criteria (usually
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 07:47:43PM -0500, G. T. Francisco wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:33:45PM -0700, Robert Chien said:
> > I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a
> > certain criteria (usually by sender's email addr), when I'm done, I
> > would like to go back to
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 12:34:29AM +0100, David Reviejo wrote:
> What do you mean with "the body"?
> As the documentation say, from Netscape you can do only two things:
> - open mutt with an empty new message when you click on an email
> link;
> - open mutt with a new message includ
> Odd. I always just "l all".
"l *" is shorter.
BB
--
Bevan Broun ph (08) 9380 1587
Computer Systems Officer fax (08) 9380 1065
Dept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering
University of Western Australia
Can I make mutt send e-mails out of a shell script?
When I do something like
mutt -i textfile -s subject to@there
mutt still wants recipient and subject to be confirmed and opens my
editor.
Stef
--
WebMaster D-WERK
President SOS-ETH
ETH Zurich
[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://hoes.li
Stef Hoesli Wiederwald writes:
> Can I make mutt send e-mails out of a shell script?
> When I do something like
>
> mutt -i textfile -s subject to@there
mutt -s subject to@there < textfile
If you're not relying on any special mutt features you're probably better
off using /bin/mail or /bin/
++ 16.04.1999, 17:09:54 (+0100) = Lars Hecking:
> If you're not relying on any special mutt features you're probably better
> off using /bin/mail or /bin/mailx instead or whatever your OS provides.
Why is that? I have used this mutt consctruction myself a lot (i used it
in a script to send me the
19 matches
Mail list logo
