Hi.
On Mon 2002-06-03 at 17:17:10 +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
> >> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
> >> only the first message. Is there any
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:44:56AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Dan, et al --
>
> ...and then Dan Boger said...
> %
> % On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> % > It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
> % > tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, onl
Dan, et al --
...and then Dan Boger said...
%
% On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
% > It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
% > tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, only the first article of that
% > thread got marked read...
%
% try ;wN (T
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:17:10PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote:
> It doesn't do the job either. I did tag a certain thread with
> tag-thread, and then pressed ;N. Still, only the first article of that
> thread got marked read...
try ;wN (Tagged-SetFlag-New)
:)
--
Dan Boger
Linux MVP
brainbench.c
Benjamin Pflugmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
>> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag those collapsed threads,
>> only the first message. Is there any work-around for this? Would be nice
>> to be able to mark a big bunch of
Hi Mutt pals,
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:28:34AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Mads --
>
>
> Hey, awesome! Would you care to be part of the mutt RPM team? Drop a
> note to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you can contribute. We have one
> SuSE guy but I don't know that he has more than 6.x...
No. I
Hi.
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 01:43:23PM +0300, Jussi Ekholm wrote
[...]
> I was just wondering -- I tried tagging some collapsed threads, and then
> pressing ;N. I was just guessing, but I guessed it right: it marks the
> tagged articles (un)read...
>
> What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really
Jussi --
...and then Jussi Ekholm said...
%
% I was just wondering -- I tried tagging some collapsed threads, and then
% pressing ;N. I was just guessing, but I guessed it right: it marks the
% tagged articles (un)read...
Yep. But ...
%
% What I noticed, was, that it doesn't really tag thos
Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Bruno Caprile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-29-02 09:42]:
>> I think I've gone thoroughly through all the documentation (but,
>> perhaps, not thorougly enough), yet I couldn't find a way to save all
>> tagged messages onto one and the same folder. Could anyone hel
Mads --
...and then Mads Martin Joergensen said...
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [May 30. 2002 00:13]:
% > Fergit RPMs (though our RPM team is starting to build them now) and just
% > build your own from source like a real man. Heck, surf over to
%
% Mutt for SuSE Linux 7.3 and 8.0:
%
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [May 30. 2002 00:13]:
> Fergit RPMs (though our RPM team is starting to build them now) and just
> build your own from source like a real man. Heck, surf over to
Mutt for SuSE Linux 7.3 and 8.0:
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/mmj/{7.3,8.0}/mutt-1.4i-0.i386.rpm
-
On 05/29/02, 05:11:53PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Fergit RPMs (though our RPM team is starting to build them now) and just
> build your own from source like a real man. Heck, surf over to
>
> http://mutt.justpickone.org/mutt-build-cocktail/
>
> and see how a *real* mess of a mutt is made :
John --
...and then John P Verel said...
%
% On 05/29/02, 04:51:12PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
% > John --
%
% > So when are you going to bump to 1.4? :-)
%
% Well, I'm a Venerable RPM sissy ;). I'm supposing it won't be long
% 'till that day for 1.4 ... unless there's a site with one already
On 05/29/02, 04:51:12PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> John --
> So when are you going to bump to 1.4? :-)
Well, I'm a Venerable RPM sissy ;). I'm supposing it won't be long
'till that day for 1.4 ... unless there's a site with one already built?
--
John P. Verel
Living Proof That Low Tech Beats
John --
...and then John P Verel said...
%
% Yet another cool mutt feature (is there no end ;). I'd missed this
There definitely is no end :-) Heck, I'm still learning things from the
manual myself, though I'm by no means the Most Venerable on the list. It
pays to read the changes file,
Yet another cool mutt feature (is there no end ;). I'd missed this
one. Thanks, David :)
On 05/29/02, 03:28:02PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> ...and then John P Verel said...
> % Also, AFAIK, you'll need to create the folder outside of Mutt before
> % saving to it. Just do: $ touch ~/Mail/foo
John, et al --
...and then John P Verel said...
%
% On 05/29/02, 09:59:18AM -0500, Patrick wrote:
...
%
% Also, AFAIK, you'll need to create the folder outside of Mutt before
% saving to it. Just do: $ touch ~/Mail/foo then as Patrick wrote above.
Nope. From TFM:
6.3.27. confirmcreate
On 05/29/02, 09:59:18AM -0500, Patrick wrote:
> * Bruno Caprile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-29-02 09:42]:
> The keystrokes would be: ;s[ ; = action to all tagged ] and
> [ s = save ]
>
* Bruno Caprile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05-29-02 09:42]:
> dear all;
>
> I think I've gone thoroughly through all the documentation (but,
> perhaps, not thorougly enough), yet I couldn't find a way to save all
> tagged messages onto one and the same folder. Could anyone help?
> thanks in advanc
dear all;
I think I've gone thoroughly through all the documentation (but,
perhaps, not thorougly enough), yet I couldn't find a way to save all
tagged messages onto one and the same folder. Could anyone help?
thanks in advance.
bruno
20 matches
Mail list logo
