Even after upgrading to 1.0, here's my listing:
8 t Nov 19 brad( 7) Re: today
9 r > Nov 19 To sean ( 11) today
10 T Nov 19 javierc ( 16) |->
11 > Nov 21 To sean ( 35) |->
I have sorting set to threads. I received 8 after I sent 9. My message
9 w
At 14:55 -0600 22 Nov 1999, brd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've noticed that even though they have the same subject, though, a reply
> that comes with a date-sent that shows a time before the original message
> (from someone who's time is off on their pc) does not get included as
> part of the t
"X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us"
Maybe you should upgrade to the latest version before complaining..
I have 1.0, and it works just fine there.
Example:
1 Nov 22 Gregory Neil Sh ( 73) |->
2 Dec 12 Michal Zalewski ( 26) Sendmail 8.x.x - any user may rebuild ali
Btw: the reason that message 1 is
> I've come to love sort=threads. I leave sort_aux at date-sent.
> I've noticed that even though they have the same subject, though, a reply
> that comes with a date-sent that shows a time before the original message
> (from someone who's time is off on their pc) does not get included as
> part o
I've come to love sort=threads. I leave sort_aux at date-sent.
I've noticed that even though they have the same subject, though, a reply
that comes with a date-sent that shows a time before the original message
(from someone who's time is off on their pc) does not get included as
part of the thre
