Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But it could, in theory, keep track of how many messages were in the
> "new" dir when it left that folder, and if that number is the same
> currently then there is no "really new" mail.
As you mention, that's not a very accurate way to do it, and woul
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> I can get a duplicate X-Mailer header by editing a message that was
> sent with mutt and then resending it.
That's what I did. I first sent it to the list, and got a reply that
my address isn't registered (because I subscribe the list on another
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 29 Sep 1999:
> In maildir folders, mail with the "N" status is placed in the "new"
> subdir. And so are messages that have been newly delivered.
Right, yes, understood.
> So, Mutt
> can't tell the difference between these two types of messages.
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't want to update the N flags, so I press $ to sync the
> folder, then % to avoid writing changes on exit. After that, when
> I change to another folder, Mutt tells me that I have "New mail in
> =FolderIJustLeft". This is more of a minor annoyan
Alexander Dvorak t2069 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 29 Sep
1999:
> The folders reside on an NFS directory
> and mails are delivered in these folders with
> .procmail.
Like others, I recommend switching to Maildir folders if you are reading
your mail from NFS-mounted disk. Not that I've eve
Lars Hecking:
> > > Staffan's mail has a duplicate
> >
> > > X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
> >
> > > header. A problem with that release?
> >
> > I'm not seeing it on my mail and I'm using that release. Do you
> > see duplicates on this message?
>
> Nope, yours is fine.
>
> The only othe
Lars Hecking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The only other duplicate X-Mailer: in this month's mutt-users archive
> was marked Mutt 0.95.7i. So it may be a local/config problem.
There is a bug that causes the X-Mailer to be re-added to the headers,
whenever a message is postponed and recalled.
> > Staffan's mail has a duplicate
>
> > X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
>
> > header. A problem with that release?
>
> I'm not seeing it on my mail and I'm using that release. Do you
> see duplicates on this message?
Nope, yours is fine.
The only other duplicate X-Mailer: in this month'
On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 07:34:44PM +0100, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Staffan Hämälä writes:
> > On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Alexander Dvorak t2069 wrote:
> [...]
> Staffan's mail has a duplicate
> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
> header. A problem with that release?
I'm not seeing it on my mail and I'm
Staffan Hämälä writes:
> On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Alexander Dvorak t2069 wrote:
[...]
Staffan's mail has a duplicate
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i
header. A problem with that release?
--
After a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn.
On Wed, 29 Sep 1999, Alexander Dvorak t2069 wrote:
> I have got two mailboxes =friends and =to_friends.
> If I change from the +friends mailbox to the other one
> the message 'New mail in =to_friends.' appears in the
> status-line though this is not true. If I then change
> back to =to_friends mu
Hello,
I am quite new with mutt, so please forgive me
if the quetion is stupid.
I have got two mailboxes =friends and =to_friends.
If I change from the +friends mailbox to the other one
the message 'New mail in =to_friends.' appears in the
status-line though this is not true. If I then change
ba
12 matches
Mail list logo
