Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Gray
text_flowed really does, used to do, is supposed to do and what other mailers are doing - other than getting complaints from people whose client can not handle the one or the other setting. The way it's supposed to work is to hard wrap your text at 80 characters (or 78 or 79, but this is a detail

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Richard
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 01:42:23PM -0500, Will Fiveash wrote: > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Richard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I wanted to have text_flowed enabled for certain recipients which would > > seem easy enough using send-hook, so tried > > >

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Richard
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 03:08:50PM -0400, Tim Gray wrote: > As I understand it, setting $text_flowed doesn't actually change the > content of your mail at all; it only changes a header alerting the > recipients to the fact that the message is f=f, *even if it's not*. &g

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Tim Gray
On Apr 08, 2011 at 01:39 PM +0200, Richard wrote: I wanted to have text_flowed enabled for certain recipients which would seem easy enough using send-hook, so tried I guess I'm not clear about why you wouldn't just send format=flowed text to every recipient and avoid this altogether

Re: text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-11 Thread Will Fiveash
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Richard wrote: > Hi, > > I wanted to have text_flowed enabled for certain recipients which would > seem easy enough using send-hook, so tried > > send-hook . 'set text_flowed=no' > send-hook '~t username' '

text_flowed in send-hook?

2011-04-08 Thread Richard
Hi, I wanted to have text_flowed enabled for certain recipients which would seem easy enough using send-hook, so tried send-hook . 'set text_flowed=no' send-hook '~t username' 'set text_flowed=yes' to my surprise, this does not work as expected. The hook is

Re: text_flowed

2002-01-10 Thread Ben Logan
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 11:07:10PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > > what common editors (if any) support format=flowed? i'd be interested in > > setting 'text_flowed', but i'm betting vim doesn't do this correctly by > > default. > > >

Re: text_flowed

2002-01-09 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> what common editors (if any) support format=flowed? i'd be interested in > setting 'text_flowed', but i'm betting vim doesn't do this correctly by > default. > > anyone have a vim configuration that will do this? Are you just looking for a way to have

text_flowed

2002-01-09 Thread Will Yardley
what common editors (if any) support format=flowed? i'd be interested in setting 'text_flowed', but i'm betting vim doesn't do this correctly by default. anyone have a vim configuration that will do this? w