Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread Jason Helfman
After all of that, you didn't even post what the resolution was!@!!! /jgh - Original Message - From: J McKitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 1:00 pm Subject: Re: testing procmail > Nevermind. Figured i

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread Lars Hecking
Enable verbose logging in procmail. And remember that you need a local lockfile for file deliveries. This is really off-topic here. A searchable procmail mailing list archive is at http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/procmail/ J McKitrick writes: > Well, i took your advice, and acco

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread Eugene Lee
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 05:32:50PM +, J McKitrick wrote: :I realize this is a mutt list, not a procmail list, :but this is just a quick question not worth subscribing to another :list for: : :Here's my test .procmailrc : :Problem is, nothing sent from me is ending up in chat. it all goes to

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread J McKitrick
I realize this is a mutt list, not a procmail list, but this is just a quick question not worth subscribing to another list for: Here's my test .procmailrc Problem is, nothing sent from me is ending up in chat. it all goes to the default directory. In .muttrc, i have: mailboxes ~/mail

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread J McKitrick
Nevermind. Figured it out. jm -- - Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ "I prefer the term Artificial Person myself."/ -

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread J McKitrick
Well, i took your advice, and according to the test, this should work. I tried the most basic possible procmail filter: I'm trying to match subjects with 'test' in them. But every time i send myself such a message, it disappears into oblivion. The procmail rule sends it to 'chat', which is a mai

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread Robert Kim
There is an excellent procmail FAQ. It shows you step-by-step method to test the procmail. If it worked for me, it must be easy. I was able to set up procmail in my personal mail account w/o any problem. However, I'm having trouble w/ my work mail account. For some reason I can not "|" or

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread Jon Walthour
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 11:30:07AM -0500, J McKitrick wrote: > I'm trying to test procmail with mutt. I'm new to mutt, and *very* > new to procmail I used a friend's procmailrc as a template, but i > need to know if there s a way to test it without losing mail. Check out http://www.uwasa.fi/~ts

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread Jason Helfman
I got started with this...and it helped out very much http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/ /jgh - Original Message - From: Jag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 11:12 am Subject: Re: testing procmail > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, J McKitrick wrote: &

Re: testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread Jag
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, J McKitrick wrote: > I'm trying to test procmail with mutt. I'm new to mutt, and *very* > new to procmail I used a friend's procmailrc as a template, but i > need to know if there s a way to test it without losing mail. Check out 'man procmailex' It's nothing but example

testing procmail

2000-03-15 Thread J McKitrick
I'm trying to test procmail with mutt. I'm new to mutt, and *very* new to procmail I used a friend's procmailrc as a template, but i need to know if there s a way to test it without losing mail. jm -- - Jonathon McKitrick / [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ "I p