Re: [OT?] please do not tag messages as spam

2016-10-09 Thread Will Yardley
Steve says that he's made some adjustments. Let's see if this resolves the subject tagging problem. w

Re: [OT?] please do not tag messages as spam

2016-10-07 Thread Claus Assmann
Sorry about that, it's actually something at the mailing list server that does this : it not only adds X-FidoGuard-... headers, but also munges the Subject with some utf-8 token (which seems like a useless "encoding"). That software obviously has too many false-positives :-(

[SPAM?] [OT?] please do not tag messages as spam

2016-10-07 Thread Claus Assmann
IMNSHO it's rather annoying when people send mail to the list and add a [SPAM] tag to the Subject: header. If it were spam, why would you send it to the list? [maybe the mailing list SW could filter/reject such mails :-) ...] -- Reply-To: is set, please do not Cc' me.

Re: Tag messages based on time range?

2009-09-15 Thread Patrick Shanahan
* Baldur Gislason [09-15-09 12:55]: > Can I somehow tag messages that are older/newer than X or aged between X > and Y? Yes, directions/methods are described in the fine manual. Begin in section "2. Patterns: Searching, Limiting and Tagging", expecially pattern modifiers ~d and

Tag messages based on time range?

2009-09-15 Thread Baldur Gislason
Can I somehow tag messages that are older/newer than X or aged between X and Y? Baldur

Re: tag messages

2000-04-26 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Shao Zhang [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Just a quick question, is there anyway to tag messages say from > 1 to 1. This is what the ~m pattern is for. T ~m1-1 -- Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firi

tag messages

2000-04-26 Thread Shao Zhang
Hi, Just a quick question, is there anyway to tag messages say from 1 to 1. I frequently need to delete a large amount mails, and it will be handy if I can do that. Thanks. Shao