Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-08 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, darren chamberlain wrote: > As a professional perl programmer, I have to say that I've found vim to > be the least deficient in parsing perl syntax. Better than Emacs' > cperl-mode (not a flame, and observation!) and light year's better than > anything else (have you how atro

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-08 Thread darren chamberlain
* Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-05 17:57]: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:01:44PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > > ...and then Jim MacBaine said... > > > I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs > > > and I have to sort out "the good from the bad". > > > > The perl sounds fun, but I

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-08 Thread darren chamberlain
* Jim MacBaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-05 16:52]: > Hello everybody, > > I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs > and I have to sort out "the good from the bad". Perl -> good. Java -> bad. Done. :) > Right now I'm using mutt and use a mailcap entry > to open the attachments in N

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-06 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! David T-G spake thus: > % Oh ye of little faith: > %=20 > % http://vim.sourceforge.net/tips/tip.php?tip_id=3D121 >=20 > Man, that's a good one :-) I found

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-06 Thread David T-G
Shawn, et al -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what David T-G said on Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:56:14PM -0500: % > % > Well, yeah; the same as if you use -R. But it's an editor that's simply % > in read-only mode, not a pager, and so it is a little clunkier to jump % > forw

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-06 Thread David T-G
Thomas -- ...and then Thomas Dickey said... % ... % you could make a shell-script wrapper to customize the keys. I do something % like that for vile (not for keys, but to format a manpage on-the-fly and % view it with vile). Yeah, I thought of that too late. Thanks, though. I love that this

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David T-G said on Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:56:14PM -0500: > > Well, yeah; the same as if you use -R. But it's an editor that's simply > in read-only mode, not a pager, and so it is a little clunkier to jump > forward by whole pages (you can't just hit the space bar like you do

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:56:14PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > Shawn -- > > ...and then Shawn McMahon said... > % > % begin quoting what David T-G said on Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:01:44PM -0500: > % > > % > I don't know of any pagers (ie, not meant to be an editor but instead > % > just a file vi

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread David T-G
Shawn -- ...and then Shawn McMahon said... % % begin quoting what David T-G said on Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:01:44PM -0500: % > % > I don't know of any pagers (ie, not meant to be an editor but instead % > just a file viewer) that do syntax highlighting, though that doesn't at % > all mean that

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread David T-G
Thomas, et al -- ...and then Thomas Dickey said... % % On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:01:44PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % > % > The perl sounds fun, but I feel for you for the java junk ;-) % % At least java has a well-defined grammar which makes it easy to parse. % (perl, otoh...) *grin* % % I

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Shawn McMahon
begin quoting what David T-G said on Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:01:44PM -0500: > > I don't know of any pagers (ie, not meant to be an editor but instead > just a file viewer) that do syntax highlighting, though that doesn't at > all mean that they aren't out there. vim, if called as "view", is a p

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Jim MacBaine [04/05/02 23:52:27 CEST] wrote: > I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs > and I have to sort out "the good from the bad". Your boss doesn't seem to like you? ,-) > Right now I'm using mutt and use a mailcap entry > to open the attachments in NEdit to have the > synt

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:01:44PM -0500, David T-G wrote: > ...and then Jim MacBaine said... > % I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs > % and I have to sort out "the good from the bad". > > The perl sounds fun, but I feel for you for the java junk ;-) At least java has a well-defined

Re: syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread David T-G
Jim -- ...and then Jim MacBaine said... % % Hello everybody, Hi! % % I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs % and I have to sort out "the good from the bad". The perl sounds fun, but I feel for you for the java junk ;-) % % Right now I'm using mutt and use a mailcap entry % to

syntax highlighting in mutt

2002-04-05 Thread Jim MacBaine
Hello everybody, I'm regularly recieving perl and java programs and I have to sort out "the good from the bad". Right now I'm using mutt and use a mailcap entry to open the attachments in NEdit to have the syntax highlighted and help my brain sorting the code. But it would be great to have