On 2000-03-03 17:42:33 +0100, Gero Treuner wrote:
> I don't think that indications to use the script are
> common enough to include it in the distribution.
I've commented out the gpg-2comp lines, and added plain
gpg lines. People who read their configuration files will
probably stumble over thi
Hi!
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 10:36:14AM -0500, Alec Habig wrote:
> However, for a stable-version mutt, it would be best to have the
> default/recommended setup be as straightforward as possible. If one
> doesn't have the need to make old signatures, then there should be no
> need to require an ex
Hi All,
I have a suggestion for a change to the gpg setup before releasing the
next stable version.
Currently, the included gpg.rc file is set to use the gpg-2comp script
for signing. This is a nice script, which allows the use of old RSA
signatures.
However, for a stable-version mutt, it wou
