Re: status flags and status fields

2000-04-30 Thread indy
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 09:14:21PM +0200, Martin Macok wrote: > > 1) RFC822 doesn't mention the "Status:" header field, where is this > > documented? > > RFC 2076Internet Message Headers > >This field is used by some mail Status: Non-standard, >delivery syste

Re: status flags and status fields

2000-04-30 Thread Martin Macok
On Sun, Apr 30, 2000 at 07:50:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1) RFC822 doesn't mention the "Status:" header field, where is this > documented? RFC 2076Internet Message Headers This field is used by some mail Status: Non-standard, delivery systems to ind

status flags and status fields

2000-04-30 Thread indy
Hi, I finally managed to solve that annoying status flag problem. Though, I still have a few questions (see below)... Firstly, mutt wasn't responsible for the missing flags in its message index. Nor were any mail notifiers causing havoc. When in X11 I use glbiff and mutt without any problems.