On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 05:33:05PM -0700, Duncan Watson wrote:
> I use the exact same procedure with the added benefit of automatically
> accepting email from anyone in my company since so many of them bcc me or
> use an alias that is not expanded. I simply use a rule that accepts all
> mail from
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:09:05PM -0700, Michael Elkins wrote:
> I'll just add my $0.02US to this and agree with Bruce's example. After
> spending lots of time trying to weed out spammers, I found the most
> effective filter was to simple accept all known addresses and everything
> else goes int
raf proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> not if you run procmail on the other side of the modem
> before popping the mail to the local host.
That saves you part of the cost - but your ISP still has to bear the cost of
receiving the spam - and several ISPs figure out the costs involved in getting
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Martin Treusch von Buttlar proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > There is a tool called blcheck, which can be used as a procmail-filter,
> > and it can use any DNS-RBL you like. I works great for me and you don't
> > even need to pester your BOFH to enable this.
>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 03:16:10PM +0300 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Mikko Hänninen thought:
> Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> > Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> > folders with new mail on the "c" command.
>
> You mean, like
Dave Pearson proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> to be bothered with it. I'd call it a "cost saving" in that it becomes a
> hell of a lot less annoying (and, if you're into reporting such email abuse
> there is the added benefit of having the email so you can go to work on it).
Point taken - and
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 07:07:05PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Only hassle is that procmailing to block spam is like shutting the stable
> _after_ the horse has bolted. You've already received the mail ... so any
> saving in cost is illusory at best (esp with a desktop linux box
>
Mikko Hänninen proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> I don't know, I think the annoyance factor reduction is quite
> significant, and that shouldn't be discounted. True, there are no real
> material cost savings achievable at this point.
As a sysadmin for a largish isp + portal, my interests cent
Suresh Ramasubramanian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> Only hassle is that procmailing to block spam is like shutting the stable
> _after_ the horse has bolted. You've already received the mail ... so any
> saving in cost is illusory at best (esp with a desktop linux box conne
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:18:31AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> folders with new mail on the "c" command. for instance, my Work-related
> mailboxes are listed before the lists in .muttrc but there's times when
> I'm expecting a
Martin Treusch von Buttlar proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> There is a tool called blcheck, which can be used as a procmail-filter,
> and it can use any DNS-RBL you like. I works great for me and you don't
> even need to pester your BOFH to enable this.
Like I said, spambouncer and walt dnes'
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 03:43:46PM -0700, Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> could someone post a simple spam receipe for procmail? I'm afraid I'll
> end up filtering out my important mails. You know, things like distant
> relatives writing to give me money and such..
> thanks
I metho
Hi,
On 17.10, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Besides this, at the MTA level, see if you can get your sysadmin to
> support the RBL and DUL blacklists at least (also the RSS if possible) -
> http://www.mail-abuse.org
There is a tool called blcheck, which can be used as a procmail-filter,
and it
On 2000-10-17 10:18:31 +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list
> of folders with new mail on the "c" command. for instance, my
> Work-related mailboxes are listed before the lists in .muttrc but
> there's times when I'm expecting a response to
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:18:31AM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through
> the list of folders with new mail on the "c" command. for
> instance, my Work-related mailboxes are listed before the
> lists in .muttrc but there's times when I'm expecting a
Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 17 Oct 2000:
> Incidentally, does anyone know of a way to cycle through the list of
> folders with new mail on the "c" command.
You mean, like space does?
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// T
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 04:09:05PM -0700 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Michael Elkins thought:
>
> I'll just add my $0.02US to this and agree with Bruce's example. After
> spending lots of time trying to weed out spammers, I found the most
> effective filter was to simple accept all known ad
msg.pgp
Dale Morris proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> could someone post a simple spam receipe for procmail? I'm afraid I'll
> end up filtering out my important mails. You know, things like distant
> relatives writing to give me money and such..
Two of the best I've seen are -
1. Catherine Hampton's
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 06:57:39PM -0400, Bruce DeVisser wrote:
> Though this is off topic, might as well answer at the same
> time. The following is what I have set up. It's not too
> fancy. It doesn't toast the mail, it merely sticks it into a
> 'spam' folder. This is the only way to be safe abo
On 10/16, Dale Morris rearranged the electrons to read:
> could someone post a simple spam receipe for procmail? I'm afraid I'll
> end up filtering out my important mails. You know, things like distant
> relatives writing to give me money and such..
> thanks
Here are a few simple recipes I have
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 03:43:46PM -0700, Dale Morris wrote:
> could someone post a simple spam receipe for procmail? I'm
> afraid I'll end up filtering out my important mails. You
> know, things like distant relatives writing to give me
> money and such.. thanks
Though this is off topic, might
could someone post a simple spam receipe for procmail? I'm afraid I'll
end up filtering out my important mails. You know, things like distant
relatives writing to give me money and such..
thanks
23 matches
Mail list logo
