Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-10 Thread J McKitrick
How does mutt *do* all of these things with only 300K? I'm stunned by the amount of pattern matching and on-the-fly processing the prog must do, and yet it is SO fast! And totally configurable! -- -jm

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-10 Thread David DeSimone
Byrial Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I would say the canonical way to match everything is the ~A > pattern. When referring to message patterns, ~A is the "true" way to match all messages, but other hooks refer to text strings, or pathnames, such as folder-hooks. For those, ~A match

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-10 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 23:52:30 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > And, incidentally, the best (or recommended) way of writing a pattern > that matches everything is with a single dot, "." Well, I would say the canonical way to match everything is the ~Ã pattern. In fact "." is internally converted

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread David T-G
Eugene & Josh, et al -- ...and then Eugene Lee said... % On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Jim Toth wrote: % : % : When multiple matches occur, commands are executed in the order % : they are specified in the muttrc. % % I got bit by this too just a little while ago. I guess I'm use

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Eugene Lee
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Jim Toth wrote: :On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :said: :> :> The commented out line always gets matched and will force the :> default signature. Is is simply changing the order? : :Yep, that's it. From the ma

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Jim Toth
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to > be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then > start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works > f

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Lars Hecking
Josh Kuperman writes: > I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to > be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then > start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works > fine. But I can't figure out how to get it to reset to my def

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote: > I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to > be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then > start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works > fine. But I can't fi

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Josh Kuperman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Mar 2000: > The commented out line always gets matched and will force the > default signature. Is is simply changing the order? Yes, the order is significant. Put the default send-hook first. And, incidentally, the best (or recommended) way of w

signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Josh Kuperman
I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works fine. But I can't figure out how to get it to reset to my default .signature file for the n