I'll piggy back on this issue, I hope it's alright.
repo-installed-patched mutt on Ubuntu
Mutt 1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
I can't make the sidebar pick a folder from my IMAP server.
It errors out with something like:
"no such folder ... /home/$user/Maildir"
Honestly, it's been two years since I've
On 07/09/16 at 03:50pm, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have
> just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23
> on a Debian 8 system.
>
Debian updating mutt to neomutt.
"This package is built wit
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:03:44AM +0100, Chris Green wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:32:46AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
> > On 07.09.16,15:50, Chris Green wrote:
> > > I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have
> > > just changed to
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:32:46AM +0200, Jostein Berntsen wrote:
> On 07.09.16,15:50, Chris Green wrote:
> > I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have
> > just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23
> > on a Debian 8
On 07.09.16,15:50, Chris Green wrote:
I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have
just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23
on a Debian 8 system.
Are there instructions for using the patch anywhere? I use mutt
(unpatched) at home so I
I have a login (as in ssh login) account on a system where they have
just changed to using mutt with the sidebar patch. It's mutt 1.5.23
on a Debian 8 system.
Are there instructions for using the patch anywhere? I use mutt
(unpatched) at home so I know all the basics but at the moment I
On 5 Dec 2013, at 10:50, Niels Kobschätzki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I compiled mutt on OS X with homebrew with --with-sidebar-patch.
> Unfortunately the sidebar won't come up. I found an example
> configuration-file for the sidebar-patch in the net but when sourcing it, I
> g
Hi,
I compiled mutt on OS X with homebrew with --with-sidebar-patch. Unfortunately
the sidebar won't come up. I found an example configuration-file for the
sidebar-patch in the net but when sourcing it, I get only errors
The code of the sidebar-file is:
# -*- muttrc -*-
#
# Sidebar set
James Griffin wrote:
> I believe Fedora/Redhat systems have a similar way of selecting
> which package/program should be your default using an
> "alternatives-type" command. Useful for Linux users.
At the risk of drifting too far from topic, yes, Red Hat / Fedora does
have alternatives. It appear
Hi Marco!
On Mi, 13 Feb 2013, Marco wrote:
> On 2013–02–12 Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> > Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian
> > alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are
> > used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it wil
On 2013–02–12 Bob Proulx wrote:
> Some time ago I posted this following in a discussion about the Debian
> alternatives and it includes a walkthrough of how alternatives are
> used and configured. I think it is still relevant. Perhaps it will
> help others understand how the alternatives work.
>
- Bob Proulx [2013-02-12 18:16:11 -0700] - :
> Luis Mochan wrote:
> > my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to
> > /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link
> > pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the
> > ...nice description
Luis Mochan wrote:
> my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to
> /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternatives/mutt is a link
> pointing to /usr/bin/mutt-patched, which is the actual binary for the
> ...nice description of alternatives...
Some time ago I posted this following in a di
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 22:22:35 -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> I guess there is still some confusion. When you installed
> mutt-patched, mutt was overwritten. The same thing happened to me. In
> my system, /usr/bin/mutt is a link pointing to
> /etc/alternatives/mutt. Furthermore, /etc/alternati
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:22:35PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:22:20AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > ...
> > > I guess there is some confusion: Synaptic, like aptitude and apt-get,
> > > is for installing and removing packages. Update-alternatives is to
> > > choose
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 09:22:20AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> ...
> > I guess there is some confusion: Synaptic, like aptitude and apt-get,
> > is for installing and removing packages. Update-alternatives is to
> > choose which program to use when you have several programs installed
> > that
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:55:09PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:29:29AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > ...
> > >
> > > Under Debian you could run
> > >
> > > sudo update-alternatives --config mutt
> > >
> > > to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by d
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:29:29AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> ...
> >
> > Under Debian you could run
> >
> > sudo update-alternatives --config mutt
> >
> > to choose which mutt (patched or not) to run by default. I guess that
> > Ubuntu is similar. Thus, it was not really necessary
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 03:16:08PM -0600, Luis Mochan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:02:39AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 10, 201
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 08:02:39AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 09:53:17AM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:56:46AM +1100, Brian Salter-Duke wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 06:46:11PM +0100, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 10,
; Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package,
> > > which includes the sidebar patch.
> >
> > I have Ubuntu 12.04 and Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) unmodified by me. It
> > does not have the sidebar patch as far as I can see.
>
> Then I suspe
it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google
> > > search tells me that i have to apply a patch,
> > > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch?
> >
> > Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package,
> > which includes the sideba
On Feb 10, Scott Stevenson wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +0530, dexter wrote:
> > I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting
> > to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google
> > search tells me that i have to apply a patch,
> > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this pat
patch,
> > i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch?
>
> Debian and derivatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package,
> which includes the sidebar patch.
I have Ubuntu 12.04 and Mutt 1.5.21 (2010-09-15) unmodified by me. It
does not have the sidebar patch
vatives such as Ubuntu provide a `mutt-patched` package,
which includes the sidebar patch.
--
Scott Stevenson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
I'm new to mutt, just installed one and getting
to know it, how do i get sidebar in mutt, google
search tells me that i have to apply a patch,
i'm running on ubuntu, where can i get this patch?
-dexter
I have use sidebar path for a long time.
Now I find it can be improved with some features.
1. Change the flag emails number with new emails reply to me or my thread.
Detail:
Mutt sidebar path has three number 100(90)[3].
The `100` is the all emails number.
The `(90)` is
Hello,
I have mutt with sidebar patch configured for two account in such a
way so it will change sidebar when changing the account. Unfortunately
I'm experiencing strange problems with display which are followed by
segfault. Its difficult to explain so I did a screen cast to
illustrate the
e header of the mail becomes in bold.This didn't happen when
> I didn't have the sidebar patch applied.
> I have no idea why this is happening.
> If anybody has a fix for this, then please reply to the mail.
>
> Thanks in advance.
I am using mutt with sidebar which is insta
Hello.
I am using mutt with the sidebar patch (mutt-sidebar from AUR) from
lunar-linux.org on Arch linux.
My mutt -v is:
(start)-
Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others.
Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:42:58 -0900, Tim Johnson wrote:
> I have been using 1.5.19 with the sidebar path for some time now.
> I just downloaded version 1.5.21, which I presume to be the current
> stable version.
>
> Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this version
* Brandon Sandrowicz [110121 21:32]:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:42:58PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote:
> > Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this version?
> >
> > Comments welcome
>
> Not really sure. I've tried to fix various things that are wrong
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 04:42:58PM -0900, Tim Johnson wrote:
> I have been using 1.5.19 with the sidebar path for some time now.
> I just downloaded version 1.5.21, which I presume to be the current
> stable version.
>
> Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this versio
I have been using 1.5.19 with the sidebar path for some time now.
I just downloaded version 1.5.21, which I presume to be the current
stable version.
Where are instructions for the sidebar patch for this version?
Note: I did a quick google and I seem to be seeing some conflicting
information and
I canged a mbox to Maildir lately and have a problem. Sidebar patch don't
show list of mailboxes. It's empty. When I type 'c' and set mailbox manually,
it works, but sidebar don't see my boxes.
My mutt version is 1.5.20, i've installed it from Fre
* Cristóbal Palmer [090206 16:51 -0500]
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:12:39AM +0300, Andrey Zhidenkov wrote:
> > Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it?
>
> I vaguely remember the debian package maintainer saying that he was
> working on mutt-patched to
Re: Cristóbal Palmer 2009-02-06 <20090206215134.gb23...@garp.metalab.unc.edu>
> > Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it?
>
> I vaguely remember the debian package maintainer saying that he was
> working on mutt-patched to get it working for .19, b
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 10:12:39AM +0300, Andrey Zhidenkov wrote:
> Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it?
I vaguely remember the debian package maintainer saying that he was
working on mutt-patched to get it working for .19, but that there was
a lot of work to be d
Is there a sidebar patch for 1.5.19 version? Where can I get it?
Thank you.
>> I use the sidebar patch myself and the only performance problem I see
>> with my mutt is that loading mailboxes with quite a few messages takes
>> some time. I don't know, however, if this is related to the side bar
>> patch.
Same here.
On Sun 6.Apr'08 at 11:04:20 +0100, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote:
On Sun 6.Apr'08 at 0:08:36 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
My pleasure in having the sidebar patch transform the mutt user
experience has just been destroyed by observing the poor performance
of for example scrolling up an
On Sun 6.Apr'08 at 0:08:36 +0200, Eric Smith wrote:
My pleasure in having the sidebar patch transform the mutt user
experience has just been destroyed by observing the poor performance of
for example scrolling up and down the index.
There seems to be some buffer overload with delayed res
My pleasure in having the sidebar patch transform the mutt user
experience has just been destroyed by observing the poor
performance of for example scrolling up and down the index.
There seems to be some buffer overload with delayed response
compared to an unpatched mutt which is much more
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
[...]
> Thanks, changing n to F index_author works now with the mentioned problems
> of collapsing a mailbox. This is bad. Since I don???t want all threads in
> my mailboxes uncollapsed if no new mail is available in them, I can???t
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:35:07PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of Stephan Seitz told:
The index colour patch works as expected, if I don???t have the
line(s)
- folder-hook . 'push ;push V'
index_subject doesn't color collapsed threads. This seems
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> Do you have your colorsettings in a separated file which isn't
>> sourced by the main muttrc?
>
> Now we are getting closer. Yes, I do, and this file is the last
On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:27:46PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Do you have your colorsettings in a separated file which isn't
sourced by the main muttrc?
Now we are getting closer. Yes, I do, and this file is the last sourced
colour file.
However, checking my muttrc settings and testing
On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
[...]
> Besides, if the patch was not applied, mutt would print an error for
> unknown variables.
You're right :)
> For testing purposes I downloaded your mutt version from
> http://www.lxtec.de/debarchiv/ and tested it on my i38
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 10:16:03PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Tried that:
Patch not-applied/indexcolor does not apply (enforce with -f)
Hm:
Wende Patch not-applied/indexcolor an
patching file color.c
patching file curs_lib.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 659 (offset 11 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:05:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> How did you compile your mutt version?
>
> The debian way, I downloaded mutt-15.17 (debian/unstable) and from your
> site. I copied the er-patches directory fro
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:05:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> How did you compile your mutt version?
>
> The debian way, I downloaded mutt-15.17 (debian/unstable) and from your
> site. I copied the er-patches directory fro
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:37:18PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
It seems, that your indexcolor patch didn't applied corect.
Well, I build mutt again and checked if there were some rejects. There
are none. The patch applied without failures, only some hunks are
mentioned. But this new mutt
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:18:12PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> Switch to the pager and type:
>>
>> / ~s ANT
>>
>> Which messages does mutt find?
>
> In my main folder it finds the message I wanted to colour and in the debia
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:05:13PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
How did you compile your mutt version?
The debian way, I downloaded mutt-15.17 (debian/unstable) and from your
site. I copied the er-patches directory from your source to the debian
source, corrected the series file and did „
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 09:18:12PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Switch to the pager and type:
/ ~s ANT
Which messages does mutt find?
In my main folder it finds the message I wanted to colour and in the
debian folder (the folder with my two examples) it finds a message with
IMPORTANT i
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT'
>> Works for sure ;)
>
> Well, in some ways it works, but as expected. This rule colours the
> following subjects:
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT'
Works for sure ;)
Well, in some ways it works, but as expected. This rule colours the
following subjects:
[OT] Scripting question: the length limit of a list?
and
[SECURITY] [DSA
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:23:02PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> Your mutt isn't patched with the indexcolor patch! You noticed that
>> my examples are for use with indexcolor?
>
> mutt -v shows patch-1.5.13.greek0.indexcolor-
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:23:02PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
Your mutt isn't patched with the indexcolor patch! You noticed that
my examples are for use with indexcolor?
mutt -v shows patch-1.5.13.greek0.indexcolor-3+cb. Every index_*
functions are working besides those needing regex ex
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>> color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT'
>> Works for sure ;)
>
> Not here.
> And I made sure, that this was the only color command I had in my muttrc.
Your
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 08:03:17PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT'
Works for sure ;)
Not here.
And I made sure, that this was the only color command I had in my muttrc.
Shade and sweet water!
Stephan
--
| Stephan Seitz
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
[...]
> color index_subject brightred black "~s ANT"
> does not colour mails having ANT in there subjects.
color index_subject brightred black '~s ANT'
Works for sure ;)
>
>> BTW: Try
>> $ HOWTO='pack c5,41*2,sqrt 7056,unpack(c,H)-
On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 05:15:50PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
color index_author brightwhite default !~N
color index_author brightred default ~N
color index_author red brightyellow ~F
color index_author cyan default '~r >5d'
color index_author green default '~r >10d'
color index_author brig
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 the mental interface of
Stephan Seitz told:
> Hi!
>
> I'm using mutt 1.5.17 together with the sidebar patch. Now I'm wondering
> how to user index_author and index_subject.
> The command "color index_subject red black ." will colour all
Hi!
I'm using mutt 1.5.17 together with the sidebar patch. Now I'm wondering how to
user index_author and index_subject.
The command "color index_subject red black ." will colour all subject lines,
but if I exchange "." with another expression, nothing happens.
An
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 04:33:34PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Is there a tool which tells me the characters of keystrokes?
> > xev does not work for key combinations.
>
> Yes, there is such a tool built into mutt. From the index, type
>
>:
On 2007-10-09, Andreas Leppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:36:30PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Since you didn't elaborate on what you mean by "return" except that
> > it is not the same as "enter", I assume that you mean an ASCII
> > carriage return, 0x0D. That is
On 2007-10-09, Andreas Leppert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:36:30PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > Since you didn't elaborate on what you mean by "return" except that
> > it is not the same as "enter", I assume that you mean an ASCII
> > carriage return, 0x0D. That is
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 02:36:30PM -0700, Gary Johnson wrote:
> Since you didn't elaborate on what you mean by "return" except that
> it is not the same as "enter", I assume that you mean an ASCII
> carriage return, 0x0D. That is the same character as Ctrl-J.
Well, I did not know that Ctrl-J i
Hello,
i use the sidebar patch in gentoo without a problem (1.5.16, Useflags:
berkdb crypt -debug gdbm gnutls -gpgme -idn -imap -mbox nls -nntp -pop
-qdbm -sasl sidebar smime -smtp ssl -vanilla).
I changed the bindings for better use to this:
bind index \ca sidebar-prev
bind index \cy sidebar
e active! Here is my
> configuration with regard to the sidebar patch:
>
> --- snip ---
>
> set sidebar_visible="yes"
> set sidebar_width=40
> set sidebar_delim=" | "
>
> color sidebar_new yellow default
>
> bind index \Ck sidebar-prev
> bind i
try in the sidebar is marked. Please notice that I mean
return, and not the enter key. With enter, it always works.
This only happens when the sidebar-next bindings are active! Here is my
configuration with regard to the sidebar patch:
--- snip ---
set sidebar_visible="yes"
set
On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 at 21:48, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 25 at 04:54 PM, quoth Joseph:
> >I've seen an interesting sidebar patch for mutt, though it was just that
> >"a patch" is not new and was never implemented.
> >I am just curio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 25 at 04:54 PM, quoth Joseph:
>I've seen an interesting sidebar patch for mutt, though it was just that
>"a patch" is not new and was never implemented.
>I am just curious as to the reason why it was neve
I've seen an interesting sidebar patch for mutt, though it was just that
"a patch" is not new and was never implemented.
I am just curious as to the reason why it was never implemented.
--
#Joseph
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:11:13AM -0400, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote:
> Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest
> posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.
I used Terry's excellent patch for 1.5.15 to write a new one for
1.5.16. You can find
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:11:13AM -0400, Raffi Khatchadourian wrote:
> Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest
> posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.
I wrote an e-mail to the (Terry P. Chan / [EMAIL PROTECTED])
current maintainer of the patch f
Does anyone have a working sidebar patch for mutt 1.15.16? The latest
posted on the sidebar website is for 1.15.15.
78 matches
Mail list logo
