Re: set-and-forget blanket subscribe statement

2010-04-06 Thread Brian Ryans
Quoting Michael Elkins on 2010-04-06 09:01:46: > because I believe the Debian mailing lists all add a List-Post: header > field, which Mutt should pick up. Debian lists do add a List-Post: header, which in my book is a Good Thing. > > If you are trying to properly set your Mail-Followup-To: head

Re: [LONG] set-and-forget blanket subscribe statement

2010-04-06 Thread Michael Elkins
Hi Brian, On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 05:03:01AM -0500, Brian Ryans wrote: > This brings me to one of my problems. Using mutt's 'subscribe' and > 'lists' functions, I've been able to mark every Debian list -- even > those the Project hasn't even envisioned yet -- as known [1], and some > of my most of

[LONG] set-and-forget blanket subscribe statement

2010-04-05 Thread Brian Ryans
I read lists. Lots of lists. The list server to which I have the most subscriptions is Debian, at 27. I've got many more lists I'd like to subscribe to, and my approach to subscribing has been to subscribe to 2-3 lists, get used to their traffic flow, then subscribe to a couple more. Rinse and repe