I'm not sure why, but I finally got the results I wanted by adding
"-e 'set realname=supp...@example.com'" to the mix. Thanks for the
assistance.
Wayne
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 01:36:54PM -0400, Monte Stevens wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:04:36PM -0600, Wayne Richards wrote:
> > I eliminated
On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 04:04:36PM -0600, Wayne Richards wrote:
> I eliminated the spaces, yet still get the same result (the
> command-line method doesn't get the proper "From" value). Any other
> thoughts?
Well, I've attempted to do what you're doing and I can make it work
here (I guess). What
I eliminated the spaces, yet still get the same result (the command-line method
doesn't get the proper "From" value). Any other thoughts?
Wayne
>On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:07:37PM -0600, Wayne Richards wrote:
>> I'm getting different results between sending mail from the command line and
>> using
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 01:07:37PM -0600, Wayne Richards wrote:
> I'm getting different results between sending mail from the command line and
> using mutt manually. I can use mutt directly to send mail with the desired
> "From" and "Reply-to" headers. But when I use the command line, the From
>
I'm getting different results between sending mail from the command line and
using mutt manually. I can use mutt directly to send mail with the desired
"From" and "Reply-to" headers. But when I use the command line, the From header
gets changed on me somewhere.
>From the command line:
echo "mes
