On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 07:50:25PM +0100, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> I already tried this. It seems only to be effective at the To:
> prompt at the initial send-menu if autoedit is unset.
> But it seems to have no effect in the compose menu.
It's because there is a chicken-and-egg problem. send-hoo
On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 09:13:07AM -0600, Knute wrote:
>
> Try this:
> send-hook . 'set record=+sent'
I already tried this. It seems only to be effective at the To:
prompt at the initial send-menu if autoedit is unset.
But it seems to have no effect in the compose menu.
Aliases are reeval
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:46:32PM -0600, Knute wrote:
> >
> > Don't you have to define a default hook in the config file before you
> > call the send-hook so that mutt knows what it needs to look at first?
>
> I have:
>
> set default_hook="~
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:46:32PM -0600, Knute wrote:
>
> Don't you have to define a default hook in the config file before you
> call the send-hook so that mutt knows what it needs to look at first?
I have:
set default_hook="~t %s"
send-hook . set record=+sent
Is there another defaul
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> edit_headers set.
> Only the answer from the initial send-menu seems to be considered.
> Changes from the invoked editor and the compose menu don't seem to
> have any effect.
> This is a
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Why not reevaluate the send-hooks after the editing session and after
> changing the recipient in the compose menu?
For instance, send-hooks can be used to insert different signatures
matching certain addresses (inserting sigs in different languages,
etc.). Re-
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 06:03:19PM +0200, Holger Lillqvist wrote:
> On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> > It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> > edit_headers set.
>
> > This is a bug, isn't it?
>
> Why should it be considered a bug? Autoedit per definition skips
> the se
On Jan 8, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
> edit_headers set.
> This is a bug, isn't it?
Why should it be considered a bug? Autoedit per definition skips
the send-menu, and as the recipient is still unknown when you enter
the editor, send-hoo
It seems to me send-hook ~t is not working with autoedit and
edit_headers set.
Only the answer from the initial send-menu seems to be considered.
Changes from the invoked editor and the compose menu don't seem to
have any effect.
This is a bug, isn't it?
-Hanspeter
