Re: send-hook (idiot) question

1999-05-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: send-hook (idiot) question

1999-05-24 Thread Rejo
++ 24/05/99 17:59 +0200 - Ralf Hildebrandt: >send-hook .* 'set signature="~/.normal_signature"' ^ No need for this '*' as the single dot there already indicates the rule should be used on all of the messages. -Rejo. -- = Rejo [Sister Ray Crisiscentrum][EMAI

Re: send-hook (idiot) question

1999-05-24 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: send-hook (idiot) question

1999-05-24 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=UTZ8bGhNySVQ9LYl; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

send-hook (idiot) question

1999-05-24 Thread Forrest Carpenter
I've trolled the manuals and FAQ, and I know this has bee covered, but I just can't seem to solve this on my own. If I use a send-hook to set a particular signature for a recipient, say "send-hook studio 'set signature="~/.sig_studio"'" or similar, then mutt behaves normally until I've sent mail