Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 08:30:25 +0200 > From: Cedric Duval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: mutt-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: search-next annoyance > > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > macro pager n "\n" > > > >

Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-21 Thread Cedric Duval
Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > macro pager n "\n" > > ISTR there was a reason why i didn't just do this in the first > > place, but i can't remember what it was right now. will try. > hm, yes, here's the reason: > the macro as suggested scrolls down one line with my current >

Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 02:59:21 +0200 > From: Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: mutt-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: search-next annoyance > > > > it's obviously trying to be helpful, but in fact does just the > > > oppos

Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 00:12:38 +0200 > From: Cedric Duval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: mutt-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: search-next annoyance > > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > > > > at this moment, instead of just jumping to

Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:13:41 +0200 > From: Michael Tatge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: mutt-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1] > > Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > > * Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [

Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]

2002-07-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:00:21 +0200 > From: Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: mutt-users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1] > > * Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 19:57]: > > i'm getting pretty

Re: search-next annoyance

2002-07-18 Thread Cedric Duval
Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > at this moment, instead of just jumping to the next match, mutt prompts > me for the pattern. But you are presented the previous value at the prompt, don't you? > it's obviously trying to be helpful, but in fact does just the > opposite. i just want it to do what

Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]

2002-07-18 Thread Michael Tatge
Sven Guckes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > * Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 19:57]: > > starting in index: > > ~b pattern > > > > pattern > > > > > > > > > > hmm... > > > at this moment, instead of just jumping to the > > next match, mutt prompts me for the pattern. > > h

Re: search-next annoyance [1.5.1]

2002-07-18 Thread Sven Guckes
* Roman Neuhauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-15 19:57]: > i'm getting pretty annoyed by the behavior of search-next; this is how i > use mutt pretty often, and it doesn't exactly help to make it easier: > > starting in index: > ~b pattern > > pattern > > > > hmm... > at this moment, inste

search-next annoyance

2002-07-15 Thread Roman Neuhauser
hi there, i'm getting pretty annoyed by the behavior of search-next; this is how i use mutt pretty often, and it doesn't exactly help to make it easier: starting in index: ~b pattern pattern at this moment, instead of just jumping to the next match, mutt prompts me for the pattern. it's o