Thorsten --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% * David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-18 02:17]:
% >(Oh, yeah -- the %_ ensures that the filename will be lower case.)
% Huh?
It's a patch:
...
Feature patch: %_ 0.94.12 by O'Shaughnessy Evans
...
Q
Magnus --
...and then Magnus Bodin said...
%
% Is it possible to fcc-hook to a pipe as well?
Not at the moment, though that was one of the possible solutions the last
time this came up on the list. We've seen it a few times.
Now, to a *named* pipe might be possible, since that just looks lik
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 08:17:11PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
> Eric --
>
> ...and then Eric Smith said...
> %
> % so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail
> % regardless of where is is fcc'ed?
> %
> % a simple (mutt) solution?
>
> Why not just set sent=+sentmail or such? D
Hi,
* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-12-18 02:17]:
>(Oh, yeah -- the %_ ensures that the filename will be lower case.)
Huh?
Thorsten
--
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind unverletzlich.
- Grundgesetz, Artikel 10, Abs. 1
Eric --
...and then Eric Smith said...
%
% so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail
% regardless of where is is fcc'ed?
%
% a simple (mutt) solution?
Why not just set sent=+sentmail or such? Don't use the fcc function (or
hook it to the same place) since you want it all
so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail
regardless of where is is fcc'ed?
a simple (mutt) solution?
--
Eric Smith
