* On Jun 25, 2002, Matthew D. Fuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:41:46PM +0200 I heard the voice of
> Rocco Rutte, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > > Have the pros and cons of an external mail notification
> > > program already been discussed on the lists?
> >
> > Hmm, w
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:41:46PM +0200 I heard the voice of
Rocco Rutte, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> > Have the pros and cons of an external mail notification
> > program already been discussed on the lists?
>
> Hmm, what about biff and comsat allthough it doesn't catch
> all your folders at on
Hi,
* Paul Stoeber [02-06-25 06:56:39 +0200] wrote:
> I meant: Have the pros and cons of { having mutt call an
> external program when new mail arrives } already been
> discussed? From Sven's intense reaction I guess it could
> have been.
Not that I know. The only negative thing I can imagine
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:41:46PM +0200, Rocco Rutte wrote:
> * Paul Stoeber [02-06-24 21:27:06 +0200] wrote:
> > Have the pros and cons of an external mail notification
> > program already been discussed on the lists?
>
> Hmm, what about biff and comsat allthough it doesn't catch
> all your fol
Hi,
* Paul Stoeber [02-06-24 21:27:06 +0200] wrote:
> Have the pros and cons of an external mail notification
> program already been discussed on the lists?
Hmm, what about biff and comsat allthough it doesn't catch
all your folders at once...
Cheers, Rocco
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 03:00:12PM -0400, Dan Boger wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 06:54:55PM +, Paul Stoeber wrote:
> > > I actually said it can't be modified by someone else, unless you made it
> > > so.
> >
> > True. I guess Sven's comments have upset my logic unit.
> >
> > Now serious
