Re: rtfm dammit

2002-09-09 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.09.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Mark J. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:59:24AM -0400, Bruno Lustosa wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > > Actually my sig is at least ELEVEN lines, but hey, whose counting ? > > > ( FYI - Th

quote (was: rtfm dammit)

2002-09-09 Thread jkinz
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 09:10:11AM -0400, Mark J. Reed wrote: > > "Linux" is in "evitable" ==> "Linux is inevitable." Yes. Quote from John "Maddog" Hall circa 1994 Linux Lectures. (and quite true IMHO). Word riddles are different from a plain scrambles in that they require leaps of logic. Ma

Re: rtfm dammit

2002-09-09 Thread Peter
* Bruno Lustosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-09 7:59am]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Actually my sig is at least ELEVEN lines, but hey, whose counting ? > > ( FYI - The last part of the sig has a word riddle in it) > > //\ eLviintuaxbilse/\\ > >

Re: rtfm dammit

2002-09-09 Thread Mark J. Reed
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 08:59:24AM -0400, Bruno Lustosa wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > > Actually my sig is at least ELEVEN lines, but hey, whose counting ? > > ( FYI - The last part of the sig has a word riddle in it) > > //\ eLviintuaxbilse/\\

Re: rtfm dammit

2002-09-09 Thread Bruno Lustosa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Actually my sig is at least ELEVEN lines, but hey, whose counting ? > ( FYI - The last part of the sig has a word riddle in it) > //\ eLviintuaxbilse/\\ Linux is evitable? What's the sense on it? -- Bruno Lustosa, aka Lo

Re: rtfm dammit

2002-09-06 Thread Dan Resler
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:30:12PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Someday Sven will realize that mutt is a tool, not a religion. (maybe.. ) > (Now "where" did I put my flameproof suit / ) Oh, I doubt it. We'll probably have self-appointed net cops with us as long as there's a net. Just wat

Re: rtfm dammit

2002-09-06 Thread jkinz
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:03:00PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 11:52]: > > List reply ? there's a LIST REPLY ? Time for more RTM ! > > argh! hee hee, you are SO easy to tweak! :) > > > (I'm afraid Elm is still programmed into my fingers, ju

rtfm dammit (was: location of signature.)

2002-09-06 Thread Sven Guckes
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-06 11:52]: > > I also notice that neither list-reply nor group-reply works > > with the post I am responding to; I had to paste mutt-users > > into the Cc: line to reply to the list. Any ideas why? > > List reply ? there's a LIST REPLY ? Time fo