On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 08:06:40AM +, ed wrote:
> This doesn't do quite what I'm after as I want to take the original
> email as input to the script, not what mutt has created as the reply.
> Mainly this is so that I can inspect the headers of the original before
> generating the headers of the
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 07:40:27AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Wednesday, August 5 at 08:06 AM, quoth ed:
> > Mainly this is so that I can inspect the headers of the original
> > before generating the headers of the reply. I know it's a lot of
> > senselses work but I want to set the From: h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wednesday, August 5 at 08:06 AM, quoth ed:
> Mainly this is so that I can inspect the headers of the original
> before generating the headers of the reply. I know it's a lot of
> senselses work but I want to set the From: header to match the fi
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 10:58:32PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 4 at 07:14 PM, quoth ed:
> > Today I was wondering if it would be possible to send an entire
> > message through a filter before taking the result of that filter as
> > the input to form a new message.
> >
> > '|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Tuesday, August 4 at 07:14 PM, quoth ed:
> Today I was wondering if it would be possible to send an entire
> message through a filter before taking the result of that filter as
> the input to form a new message.
>
> '| /home/$USER/bin/filter |
Hi All,
Today I was wondering if it would be possible to send an entire message
through a filter before taking the result of that filter as the input to
form a new message.
'| /home/$USER/bin/filter | vim -'
Something like that so that when the user has finished editing the
message can then be
