On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 08:49:35PM +0200, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
Am Montag, den 11. April 2022 um 10:33:57 Uhr (-0700) schrieb Kevin J. McCarthy:
That's the part that makes no sense to me. Simply unsetting and
resetting "sign" will just display the value of $pgp_sign_as. Did
something else h
Hi Kevin,
Am Montag, den 11. April 2022 um 10:33:57 Uhr (-0700) schrieb Kevin
J. McCarthy:
>
> That's the part that makes no sense to me. Simply unsetting and
> resetting "sign" will just display the value of $pgp_sign_as. Did
> something else happen in your workflow?
It's getting clearer than
Hi,
Am Montag, den 11. April 2022 um 12:38:59 Uhr (-0400) schrieb José
María Mateos:
> I have my GPG options here:
>
> $ cat .gnupg/gpg.conf
> default-key 263080EC
> encrypt-to 263080EC
Unfortunately this didn't work here (even after restart). I get the
same error in mutt.
--
Orm
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 06:09:01PM +0200, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
when replying to a signed Email, my response Mail is automatically set
to be signed by me.
Are you doing that via $crypt_replysign or via some other method? Are
you replying to a PGP-signed message to an S/MIME message? The beha
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 06:09:01PM +0200, Orm Finnendahl wrote:
How do I set the "" value that it uses my HexKey?
I have my GPG options here:
$ cat .gnupg/gpg.conf
default-key 263080EC
encrypt-to 263080EC
There I declare what's my default key and I also tell it to always
encrypt to me too if
Hi,
when replying to a signed Email, my response Mail is automatically
set to be signed by me. The pgp line concerning my key says
"sign as: "
which result in the following error when sending:
"error signing data: General error?"
Unsetting and then resetting Security to "sign" results in the
* Jean-Christophe Bach [15.05.2011. @07:58:48 +0200]:
> * Y.Ding <0801...@gmail.com> [13.05.2011. @00:47:53 +0900]:
> > Hi
> >
> > I want to know can I set the sign file's name?
> > now the gpg sign name is "noname".
> >
> > thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> I had this problem and I solved it by adding the
* Y.Ding <0801...@gmail.com> [13.05.2011. @00:47:53 +0900]:
> Hi
>
> I want to know can I set the sign file's name?
> now the gpg sign name is "noname".
>
> thanks
Hi,
I had this problem and I solved it by adding the vk.pgp_verbose_mime
patch written by Vineet Kumar (http://www.doorstop.net/pro
Hi
I want to know can I set the sign file's name?
now the gpg sign name is "noname".
thanks
pgprEvIpuACAg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 05:35:43PM +0200, Johan Almqvist wrote:
> > Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If I send someone a message, and I've got his key, Gnus doesn't
> > > suggest to encrypt the message.
> This was about Gnus, but can mutt do this?
i use this script:
gpgers.sh
* Josh Huber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If I send someone a message, and I've got his key, Gnus doesn't
> > suggest to encrypt the message.
>
> Agreed, this would be nice...
This was about Gnus, but can mutt do this?
-Johan
--
Johan Almqvist
http://www
Hi,
David T-G wrote:
> % Actually, I also have some of the following:
> %
> % save-hook "~f [EMAIL PROTECTED]" =Leute/Firstname-Lastname.gz
> % fcc-hook "~C [EMAIL PROTECTED]" =Leute/Firstname-Lastname.gz
>
> Hey, that's nice. BTW, you should check out fcc-save-hook and perhaps
> cut
David T-G wrote:
> That sounds like a nice middle ground. Do you have one of those hooks
> for every outlook user in your list, or do you build a regexp of all
> users for that single hook?
No, I keep a list of all the Outlook users I know, but right now,
there's only two people in that list.
he
wrong part ;-)
% non-us users, we have to rely on macros do pgp-sign mail to Outlook
% users.
Hey, that's a good point that brings up another: can you sign multipart
mail this way? If I want to forward something to a LookOut! user and
either sign or encrypt it, p_o_c and p_c_t fall back to
os.
Unfortunately, pgp_outlook_compat relies on pgp_create_traditional,
which only works for us-ascii mail as stated in the manual. So for us
non-us users, we have to rely on macros do pgp-sign mail to Outlook
users.
Here's what I do:
# This will select the correct behavior for a
Suresh, et al -
...and then Suresh Ramasubramanian said...
% Thorsten Haude [09/11/01 14:49 +0100]:
% > * Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-09 13:23]:
% > >in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
% > >signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly.
%
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thorsten Haude [09/11/01 14:49 +0100]:
> * Lukas Ruf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-11-09 13:23]:
> >in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
> >signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly.
> 6.3.101. pgp_autos
ause Mutt to always attempt to PGP/MIME
sign outgoing messages. This can be overridden by use of the pgp-
menu, when signing is not required or encryption is requested as well.
- - -
>Is it possible to have a sendhook defintion that allows the
> PGP sign mail without MIME
>as I can spe
Dear all,
in muttrc, I easily can set a sendhook such that every email gets
signed by PGP. But this always sets the MIME type accordingly.
Is it possible to have a sendhook defintion that allows the
PGP sign mail without MIME
as I can specify it manually with ctrl-P in the send menu
* Dave Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [19-10-2001 14:15]:
| i have set up auto-signature in my mutt, is it possible to switch
| that off on a per-message basis... i.e. before i hit y to send?
Before you hit "y", press "p" (bring up pgp menu), and then press "f"
(forget it).
--
René Clerc
i have set up auto-signature in my mutt, is it possible to switch that off on a
per-message basis... i.e. before i hit y to send?
tia and aloha,
dave
PGP signature
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 11:28:18AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:58:32PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
> >
> > I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify
> > signed msgs after I get their public keys outside of mutt.
> >
> > But I ca
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 06:58:32PM +0800, Horace G. Friend III wrote:
>
> I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify
> signed msgs after I get their public keys outside of mutt.
>
> But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s)ign command
> from the pgp menu
On 2001.03.13, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Horace G. Friend III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs
> after I get their public keys outside of mutt.
>
> But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s
Hi,
I've got pgp (ver. 6.5.8i) working outside of mutt. I can also verify signed msgs
after I get their public keys outside of mutt.
But I can't sign outgoing msgs. After selecting the (s)ign command from the pgp
menu enter my passphrase, I get a
received signal 11
press any key to continue...
On Fri, Dec 31, 1999 at 12:19:07AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 07:37:09PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
>> As I understand it, a PGP signature is not an encryption of the message,
>> but an encryption of an MD5 (or SHA) *digest* of the message. This is
>> like a checksu
On Thu, Dec 30, 1999 at 07:37:09PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> As I understand it, a PGP signature is not an encryption of the message,
> but an encryption of an MD5 (or SHA) *digest* of the message. This is
> like a checksum, though much more sophisticated, but it is always the
> same size.
Attila Csosz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm wondering about how can be the length of the pgp sign of a small
> and a very large mail is equal. Which part of the message will be
> encrypted?
As I understand it, a PGP signature is not an encryption of the message,
but
I'm wondering about how can be the length of the pgp sign of a small and a
very large mail is equal. Which part of the message will be encrypted?
Attila
--
---
- Debian 2.1 Linux / 2.2.13 / qmail -
- Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]-
29 matches
Mail list logo
