Re: patch problem

1999-03-13 Thread Ken W
Thank you all for the responses. The GNU patch did indeed work. -Ken -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest

Re: patch problem

1999-03-13 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 03:34:37PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote: > > I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. > > Anyone know what the problem is? > Solaris has it's own 'patch' which is not Larry Wall's patch. Sorry, further on thi

Re: patch problem

1999-03-13 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote: > Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I > have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I > run 'patch < ' I get the following: > The next patch looks like a unified context diff. > The

Re: patch problem

1999-03-13 Thread Lars Hecking
Ken W writes: > Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I > have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I > run 'patch < ' I get the following: > > The next patch looks like a unified context diff. > The next patch looks like a unified contex

Re: patch problem

1999-03-13 Thread Ollivier Robert
According to Robert Chien: > Don't know how to fix it though, I had to apply the patch manually > (luckily, it was a short one :). I'm not a developer, but I would > certainly like to know the solution as well. Can you do a "ident" or "what" on your patch binary ? I wonder which version of patch

Re: patch problem

1999-03-12 Thread Carsten Ehlers
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: patch problem

1999-03-12 Thread Brandon Long
On 03/12/99 Ken W uttered the following other thing: > Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I > have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I > run 'patch < ' I get the following: > > The next patch looks like a unified context diff. > The

Re: patch problem

1999-03-12 Thread Robert Chien
Hi Ken, I don't have a solution, but I have experienced the same thing on solaris 7 while patching to 0.95.3us. The problem seems to be that my source code and the patch do not agree on the line number. It was off by more than 5. Also, the solaris patch doesn't seem to recognize multiple patches

patch problem

1999-03-12 Thread Ken W
Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I run 'patch < ' I get the following: The next patch looks like a unified context diff. The next patch looks like a unified context diff. The next patch l