Hi,
On Wed, 05 Jan 2000, Michael Elkins wrote:
> NOTE: this should only be used as
> a last resort if you absolutely can't use procmail to rewrite your messages
> as suggested in doc/PGP-notes.txt.
The procmail rule only works if the mail is text/plain.
I sometimes get mails like
multipart/*
On Wed, Jan 05, 2000 at 01:45:33AM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> I just realized that this patch does not solve the problem which started this
> whole thread, which is dealing with an IMAP server. Unless there is a way
> to fetch the first couple of lines of the body of a message with IMAP, I do
On Wednesday, 05 January 2000 at 01:45, Michael Elkins wrote:
> I just realized that this patch does not solve the problem which started this
> whole thread, which is dealing with an IMAP server. Unless there is a way
> to fetch the first couple of lines of the body of a message with IMAP, I don'
I just realized that this patch does not solve the problem which started this
whole thread, which is dealing with an IMAP server. Unless there is a way
to fetch the first couple of lines of the body of a message with IMAP, I don't
see a clean way to accomplish automatic handling. The next best o
Though controversial, I feel that this patch is in the best interest of
promoting the use of PGP with Mutt.
This patch adds a new boolean variable $pgp_search_text which will cause Mutt
to search for the first non-blank line in every text/plain message to see if
it is a mislabeled old-style PGP m
