Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-30 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 05:24:44PM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > > That is why I think it would be much better to have manual charset > > override for headers, just like the one we have for bodies. > > IMHO, this functionality should be implemented in MUA. > > this would only work around the proble

Re: LC_CTYPE vs. charset (il)logic (was: Re: overriding the charset for headers)

2002-08-30 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:03:14AM -0700, Sam Peterson wrote: > Try keeping your locale to en_US.ISO8859-1. I think, provided > LC_CTYPE allows for 8-bits, you should be able to set $charset to > something different from LC_CTYPE, without problems. At least, I'm > able to do this with $charset=e

Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-28 Thread Michael Leone
Sven Guckes said: > * Baurjan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 10:18]: >> I've looked at procmail a while ago for body >> translation, but couldn't find a working solution. >> >> 1. All three inboxes I use are IMAP; how can I use procmail with it? I >>can define a macro that would do

Re: LC_CTYPE vs. charset (il)logic (was: Re: overriding the charset for headers)

2002-08-28 Thread Sam Peterson
It has come to my attention... ...that Baurjan Ismagulov said on Wednesday, Aug 28 2002: > Example: let's take a message encoded in iso-8859-1 and containing the > character 'รง' (LATIN SMALL LETTER C WITH CEDILLA, octal code 347). The > following table outlines how the message is displayed with di

Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-28 Thread Sven Guckes
* Baurjan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 10:18]: > I've looked at procmail a while ago for body > translation, but couldn't find a working solution. > > 1. All three inboxes I use are IMAP; how can I use procmail with it? I >can define a macro that would do what I want, but how woul

LC_CTYPE vs. charset (il)logic (was: Re: overriding the charset for headers)

2002-08-28 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:37:30PM -0700, Sam Peterson wrote: > > I'm using 1.4. I think LC_CTYPE and charset are set correctly in both > > cases. BTW, why does Mutt use both of these variables? I would find > > logical if charset have overridden LC_CTYPE. I can't see the rationale > > behind the

Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-28 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:37:30PM -0700, Sam Peterson wrote: > > My console can display koi8-r. I receive a mail encoded in windows-1251 > > with an unquoted header. Mutt converts the body to koi8-r, and I can > > read the contents. However, Mutt doesn't know the header charset, so it > > is disp

Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-28 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 03:44:08PM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote: > > message, how can one have Mutt set To: and/or Cc: fields automatically > > (Mail-Followup-To: contains both sender and list addresses)? "r" and "L" > > set To: only. > > Let me guess, you're trying this with a message you sent? Y

Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-27 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 21:23 +0300 27 Aug 2002, Baurjan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > message, how can one have Mutt set To: and/or Cc: fields automatically > (Mail-Followup-To: contains both sender and list addresses)? "r" and "L" > set To: only. Let me guess, you're trying this with a message you sent?

Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-27 Thread Sam Peterson
It has come to my attention... ...that Baurjan Ismagulov said on Tuesday, Aug 27 2002: > Hello, Hi, > I often receive messages with either unquoted 8-bit headers (in lines > like From:, To:, Subject:, etc.) or, worse, with characters quoted and > wrong charset specified. My condolences. This s

Re: overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-27 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:06:00PM +0300, Baurjan Ismagulov wrote: > P.S. Please cc to me, I'm not subscribed. > I have "lists mutt-users" and "set followup_to" in my .muttrc, but > I can't see any Followup-To: lines in the mail sent. Oops, turns out that Mutt sets Mail-Followup-To: upon sending,

overriding the charset for headers

2002-08-27 Thread Baurjan Ismagulov
Hello, this has been discussed in the past, but I couldn't find an adequate solution for my particular problem. I often receive messages with either unquoted 8-bit headers (in lines like From:, To:, Subject:, etc.) or, worse, with characters quoted and wrong charset specified. Example 1: My co