Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-05-03 Thread Daniel Nielsen
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 02:46:43PM -0400, Tom Cooney wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:17:52AM -0400, Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: > > i have procmail set up to deliver incoming into several mailboxes (mbox > > format) and i have them defined in my .muttrc using the mailboxes > > command. > > > >

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-05-01 Thread Tom Cooney
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 01:17:52AM -0400, Sridhar Srinivasan wrote: > i have procmail set up to deliver incoming into several mailboxes (mbox > format) and i have them defined in my .muttrc using the mailboxes > command. > > the problem is that mutt(1.2.5i) doesn't inform me that there is > new m

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-05-01 Thread Andre Berger
* Sridhar Srinivasan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2001-05-01 08:56 +0200: > pressing doesn't cycle through some mailboxes in which i know > there is new mail. > > i get new mail notification by running xbiff on the procmail log file, > so i know that there is new mail, but when i start mutt, it doesn't

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-30 Thread Tony Collins
At 0611 hours on 30 Apr 2001 , Brian Nelson gave the following orders: > > cycles through the mailboxes with new mail. > > > > -Ken > > It does? From what view? For me, in the index view opens the > selected message (ie. bound to display-message). What command is > supposed to do the trick?

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-30 Thread Ken Weingold
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001, Brian Nelson wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:28:22PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote: > > cycles through the mailboxes with new mail. > > > It does? From what view? For me, in the index view opens the > selected message (ie. bound to display-message). What command is > su

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-30 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 02:28:22PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001, Brian Nelson wrote: > > This is something that's confused me for a while. Is mutt supposed to > > automatically open all mailboxes that have new mail in them if you > > keep pressing the tab key? > > > > This d

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-30 Thread Sridhar Srinivasan
pressing doesn't cycle through some mailboxes in which i know there is new mail. i get new mail notification by running xbiff on the procmail log file, so i know that there is new mail, but when i start mutt, it doesn't detect any. if i manually cycle through those offending mailboxes, i find th

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-30 Thread Ken Weingold
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001, Brian Nelson wrote: > This is something that's confused me for a while. Is mutt supposed to > automatically open all mailboxes that have new mail in them if you > keep pressing the tab key? > > This doesn't happen for me. Tab will cycle through all the new email > in the c

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-30 Thread Brian Nelson
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:23:24AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > Sridhar Srinivasan proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > the problem is that mutt(1.2.5i) doesn't inform me that there is > > new mail in some of the mailboxes, specifically these mailboxes are at > > the end of the listing

Re: new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Sridhar Srinivasan proclaimed on mutt-users that: > the problem is that mutt(1.2.5i) doesn't inform me that there is > new mail in some of the mailboxes, specifically these mailboxes are at > the end of the listing in the mailboxes command. Can't duplicate that - should cycle between everyth

new mail in mailboxes

2001-04-29 Thread Sridhar Srinivasan
i have procmail set up to deliver incoming into several mailboxes (mbox format) and i have them defined in my .muttrc using the mailboxes command. the problem is that mutt(1.2.5i) doesn't inform me that there is new mail in some of the mailboxes, specifically these mailboxes are at the end of the