Re: [FIX] mutt segfaults + gdb output

1999-10-07 Thread rutger
On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 09:13:20AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 1999-10-07 00:04:25 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Ok, I tried today with several combinations. Removing .muttrc (with > > my my_hdr settings) did not change a thing, just like removing > > _any_ header. However, inserti

[FIX] mutt segfaults + gdb output

1999-10-06 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-10-07 00:04:25 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Ok, I tried today with several combinations. Removing .muttrc (with > my my_hdr settings) did not change a thing, just like removing > _any_ header. However, inserting the Message-Id: field _did_ cure > the problem: I could reply again! So,

Re: mutt segfaults + gdb output

1999-10-06 Thread rutger
On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 09:54:55PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > The behaviour you observe means most probably that we have some rare > problem when reading user headers from the edited file. Since you > seem to be able to reproduce this problem, could you please give us > a mail message which

Re: mutt segfaults + gdb output

1999-10-05 Thread Thomas Roessler
and lists settings? On 1999-10-05 20:48:22 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: Tue, 5 Oct 1999 20:48:22 +0200 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: mutt segfaults + gdb output > Reply-To: Rutger Nijlunsing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi *, >

mutt segfaults + gdb output

1999-10-05 Thread rutger
Hi *, My mutt 1.0pre2i on Solaris segfaults after pressing 'y' to send a reply to a mail. The mail to which I'm replying might miss some required headers. gdb gives: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xef6ce0a4 in strchr () (gdb) up #1 0x88af4 in encode_headers (h=0xede68) a